Adaptation of High Activity Arthroplasty Score to Turkish

July 26, 2022 updated by: Zeynal Yasacı, Harran University

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score

The objectives of this study were the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and assessment of the psychometric properties of the Turkish High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) in patients with primary TKA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HAAS instrument into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties. For cross-cultural adaptation, two bi-lingual translators used the back-translation procedure. Within a 5-to-7-day period after the first assessment, the participants will complete the Turkish version of HAAS to evaluate test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha (α) will use to assess internal consistency. The correlations with the Turkish version of the KOOS, SF-36 and FJS-12 will determine to check the validity.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Şanlıurfa, Turkey
        • Harran University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients with a total or unicompartmental knee prosthesis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Primary THA/TKA due to primary osteoarthritis for >6 months,
  2. Age <65
  3. To be able to communicate in Turkish
  4. Agree to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. who do not agree to participate in the study 2- who will undergo 2nd revision TKA 3- who have undergone lower extremity surgery and thus have sequelae 4-having cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
High-Activity Arthroplasty Score
Time Frame: Baseline,
The HAAS questionnaire, developed in 2010, is self-reported and comprises the four items walking, running, stair climbing, and the activity level [20]. The response level for each item ranges from normal function to serious limitation. The patient selects the highest possible level of his functional ability for each item. A point system for each item is applied whereby a higher score indicates a higher functional ability. The total score ranges from 0 to 18 points. The original version provides no instruction regarding missing answers.
Baseline,

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a knee-specific instrument, developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of a knee injury. It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). A Likert scale is used, and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems
Baseline
SF-36
Time Frame: Baseline

The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is an oft-used, well-researched, self-reported measure of health. It stems from a study called the Medical Outcomes Study. It comprises 36 questions which cover eight domains of health:

  1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems.
  2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems
  3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems
  4. Bodily pain
  5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being)
  6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems
  7. Vitality (energy and fatigue)
  8. General health perceptions
Baseline
Forgotten Joint Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The FJS-12 was developed to identify the awareness of an artificial joint (hip or knee) during activities of daily living. It uses a 5-point Likert response format (0, never; 1, almost; 2, seldom; 3, sometimes; and 4, mostly) consisting of 12 items that assess "the patient's ability to forget the artificial joint in everyday life" following activities of daily living -in bed at night; sitting in a chair (>1hr); walking (>15 min); taking bath; traveling in a car; climbing stairs; walking on uneven ground; standing up from a low sitting position; standing for long periods; doing housework or gardening; taking a walk or hiking, and involving in a sports activity. The raw scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 points. High scores indicate a good outcome, which means a high degree of "forgetting" the joint.
Baseline
High-Activity Arthroplasty Score
Time Frame: Within a 3-to-5-day period after the first assessment (Second assessment)
The HAAS questionnaire, developed in 2010, is self-reported and comprises the four items walking, running, stair climbing, and the activity level [20]. The response level for each item ranges from normal function to serious limitation. The patient selects the highest possible level of his functional ability for each item. A point system for each item is applied whereby a higher score indicates a higher functional ability. The total score ranges from 0 to 18 points. The original version provides no instruction regarding missing answers.
Within a 3-to-5-day period after the first assessment (Second assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zeynal YASACI, MSc, Harran University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Observational

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery--Complications

Clinical Trials on Assesment

Subscribe