Mobile Food Record on Recall Effects

February 1, 2024 updated by: University of Minnesota

Use of a Mobile Food Record, Enhanced by a Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Informatics Framework to Expand Capture of Dietary Intake

Human dietary habits remain challenging to measure. Even the "gold-standard" interviewer-administered 24 hour dietary recall has established underreporting issues especially in high-risk populations, such as patients with obesity. Performance of precision nutrition research requires state of the art tools to capture individual dietary patterns. Given the widespread availability of smart phones, mobile-phone based food records present a prime opportunity to capture "in the field" dietary intake. Mobile food records, however, are not yet widely used in nutrition research. Several reasons exist. First, the mobile food record needs to be validated relative to the "gold standard" of dietary intake, the 24-hour dietary recall. Second, many available mobile food records are commercially based, with caveats about data availability and meeting research-quality data security practices (HIPAA compliance).

In response, this study includes using a freely available, research-focused, HIPAA compliant, mobile food record (mCC: my Circadian Clock app) actively used in research studies (including our own ongoing work) to test the hypothesis that a mobile food record can expand capture of dietary intake. The proposed aims include the following: Using a randomized, cross-over design, evaluation of augmenting interviewer-administered 24-hour dietary recalls by a mobile food record (Augmented Recall) results in less energy intake underreporting than a standard (un-augmented) interviewer administered 24-hour dietary recall (Standard Recall).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults between 18-65 years old
  • BMI ≥30 kg/m2
  • Without a 4 year (BS/BA) college degree
  • Owns a smart phone
  • Able to read and speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Standard Recall
Standard interviewer-administered 24-hour dietary recall.
Augmented Recall
Interviewer use of the mCC app for 24-hour dietary recall.
Interviewer use of the mCC app during the 24-hour dietary recall interview.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caloric intake
Time Frame: 60 days from intervention
Compare caloric intake assessed by the augmented recall relative to the standardized recall
60 days from intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Energy intake
Time Frame: 24 hours following food intake
Comparison of the energy intake calculated from the 24 hour interviewer administered dietary recall which is augmented by concurrent use and review of a mobile food record (Augmented Recall) vs the energy intake calculated from standard interviewer administered 24-hour dietary recall (Standard Recall)
24 hours following food intake

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa Chow, MD, UMN

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MED-2021-30429

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on mCC app

3
Subscribe