Alberta Collaborative QI Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Moderate and Late Preterm Infants (ABC-QI Trial) (ABC-QI)

July 15, 2025 updated by: University of Calgary

Alberta (AB) Collaborative Quality Improvement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Preterm Infants 32 - 36 Weeks' Gestation: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

The ABC-QI Trial aims to implement collaborative quality improvement (QI) strategies to standardize care for 32-36 week infants in Level 2 and 3 Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across the province of Alberta. The investigators want to know if using validated quality improvement methods and evidence-based care bundles will decrease the duration of hospital stay and get babies home as quickly as possible.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial will be conducted in 12 NICUs across Alberta (10 Level II and 2 Level III). Each NICU is considered a cluster and will be randomized to transition to the intervention arm at one of three time points.

The planned trial interventions include:

Intervention arm (Collaborative QI Strategies): The study intervention is a constellation of collaborative QI strategies: 1) QI Team Building; 2) QI Education; 3) Implementation of 2 standardized practice care bundles (Respiratory Care, and Nutritional Care); 4) QI mentoring; and 5) Collaborative networking. Based on the randomization, 4 NICUs will transition to the intervention arm at the end of each year.

Control arm (current management): All participating NICUs will be in the control arm during the first year prior to randomization to create a baseline of the current practices and between-units variation. NICUs in the control arm can continue conducting QI activities relevant to current practice, but without receiving the interventions outlined above.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

9500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3M 1M4
        • Recruiting
        • South Health Campus
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T1Y 6J4
        • Recruiting
        • Peter Lougheed Centre
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2V 1P9
        • Recruiting
        • Rockyview General Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T8V 4B1
        • Recruiting
        • Grande Prairie Regional Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H 3V9
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Alexandra Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6L 5X8
        • Recruiting
        • Grey Nuns Community Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5R 4H5
        • Recruiting
        • Misericordia Community Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T8N 6C4
        • Recruiting
        • Sturgeon Community Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, T1J 1W5
        • Recruiting
        • Chinook Regional Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada, T1A 4H6
        • Recruiting
        • Medicine Hat Regional Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc
      • Red Deer, Alberta, Canada, T4N 4E7
        • Recruiting
        • Red Deer Regional Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mahesha Bandara, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Preterm Infants: Infants born at 32 to 36 weeks' gestation and admitted to the participating NICUs or postpartum units.

Quality Improvement Implementation Survey version 2 (QIIS-II) and semi-structured interview participants: Management staff, nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and allied health staff employed in participating NICUs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm Infants:

    • Major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities.
    • Primary admission to a surgical NICU: Alberta Children's Hospital or Stollery Children's Hospital.
    • Infants born in or transferred to a NICU outside Alberta.
    • Patients who have imposed confidentiality restrictions on accessing their health records.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Arm- Current management
NICUs in the control arm can continue conducting QI activities relevant to current practice and current standard of care, but without receiving the interventions until they transition to the intervention arm.
All participating NICUs will be in the control arm during the first year prior to randomization to create a baseline of the current practices and between-units variation. NICUs in the control arm can continue conducting QI activities relevant to current practice, but without receiving the interventions outlined above until they transition to the intervention arm. The investigators will capture these activities and account for them in the analysis.
Experimental: Intervention Arm- Collaborative Quality implementation Strategies
The study intervention is a constellation of collaborative QI strategies: 1) QI Team Building; 2) QI Education; 3) Implementation of 2 standardized practice care bundles (Respiratory Care, and Nutritional Care); 4) QI mentoring; and 5) Collaborative networking.
Each NICU will create a core QI team composed of 6-8 multidisciplinary members including a parent advisor, when feasible. This team will lead the QI activities and education, and champion the culture and practice change in the unit.
Each NICU QI team will receive standardized QI education using the 6-hour EPIQ Workshop which involves hands-on approach to enable teams to successfully implement QI projects together. EPIQ 10 Steps and QI Tools will be used to build the team's understanding of QI using realistic improvement opportunities based on the standardized care bundles identified in the trial.

A care bundle is a small, simple set (3-5 elements) of evidence-based practices that, when performed collectively and reliably, will result in improved patient outcomes. This bundle will aim to implement best practices for stabilization and respiratory care in moderate and late preterm infants (MLPIs) including

  1. establishing effective ventilation in the delivery room
  2. prevention of hypothermia
  3. early diagnosis and management of respiratory distress with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  4. standardized approach for surfactant indications and administration
  5. standardized approach for early extubation.

A care bundle is a small, simple set (3-5 elements) of evidence-based practices that, when performed collectively and reliably, will result in improved patient outcomes. This bundle will aim to implement best practices for nutritional support in MLPIs including

  1. early initiation of enteral or parenteral nutrition;
  2. standardized tables for feeding initiation and progression
  3. optimizing breastfeeding and use of mother's own milk
  4. standardized approach for a transition from enteral nutrition via tube feeds to oral feeds.
Each NICU in the intervention arm will have one or more assigned members of the study team who are experienced in collaborative QI and EPIQ methods. The mentors will help local QI teams to engage frontline staff in QI and navigate the unit-specific challenges.
The study team will conduct virtual meetings every 2 months for the NICUs in intervention arm allowing local QI teams to discuss progress, and share data. The investigators will arrange annual in-person or virtual meetings for the NICUs in the intervention arm to present projects, successes, and lessons learned. These NICUs will have continuing access to the data and will receive quarterly reports using statistical process control charts outlining the unit's performance compared to other units and to the group average.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of Stay
Time Frame: Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
The duration of hospitalization until final discharge.
Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost to healthcare system per participant
Time Frame: Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
The investigators will use the Canadian Institute for Health Information Patient Cost Estimator to calculate the daily cost based on the Case Mix Groups for gestational age and birth weight.
Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Number of participants with Hypothermia
Time Frame: Within 1 hour of birth
Axillary temperature <36.5°C.
Within 1 hour of birth
Number of participants with Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: First 24 hours of age
Blood glucose <2.6 mmol/L.
First 24 hours of age
Duration of respiratory support
Time Frame: Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Total number of days administered
Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Age at achieving full enteral feeding
Time Frame: Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Date when the enteral intake reaches 120 ml/kg/day.
Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Time to regain birth weight
Time Frame: Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Difference in days between birth date and date when the infants regains or exceeds birth weight after initial weight loss.
Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Weight in grams
Time Frame: At discharge home in survivors, assessed up to a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
actual values in grams
At discharge home in survivors, assessed up to a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Length in centimeters
Time Frame: At discharge home in survivors, assessed up to a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
actual values in centimeters
At discharge home in survivors, assessed up to a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Head circumference in centimeters
Time Frame: At discharge home in survivors, assessed up to a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
actual values in centimeters
At discharge home in survivors, assessed up to a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Breastmilk use
Time Frame: Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Defined as number of feeds where infant received breastfeeding or maternal expressed breastmilk
Birth until discharge home or death, whichever came first, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Number of unplanned rehospitalizations per participant
Time Frame: Within 30 days after discharge home
Unplanned readmission to any hospital in Alberta following discharge
Within 30 days after discharge home
Number of emergency room visits per participant
Time Frame: Within 30 days after discharge home
Emergency room visits to any hospital in Alberta following discharge
Within 30 days after discharge home
Hospital mortality
Time Frame: Until first discharge home, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Proportion of infants who dies before first discharge home
Until first discharge home, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Infant mortality before 1 year of corrected age
Time Frame: Before 1 year of corrected age
Corrected age = chronological age - days required for an infant to complete postmenstrual age of 40 weeks.
Before 1 year of corrected age
Transfer from Level II to Level III NICU
Time Frame: Until first discharge home, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Proportion of infants who require escalation of care and transfer to Level III NICU.
Until first discharge home, assessed until the participant reaches a corrected age of 6 months (6 months after their birth due date).
Staff perception of collaborative QI (EPIQ) implementation.
Time Frame: Year 2, 3, and 4 of study
Semi-structured interviews with selected sample of staff from each NICU
Year 2, 3, and 4 of study
Surfactant administration
Time Frame: First 168 hours of age.
Date and method of administration
First 168 hours of age.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ayman Abou Mehrem, MD, University of Calgary
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Toye, MD, University of Alberta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the study is completed, the de-identified, archived data will be transmitted to and stored at the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR), for use by other researchers including those outside of the study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after completion of the study and publication of the main manuscript.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Approval from the principle investigator and the ABC-QI Trial Data Management Committee.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Length of Stay

Clinical Trials on Current practice- standard of care

Subscribe