The Feasibility and Effect of PACUTS on Health Promotion for Stroke Wheelchair User in Long-term Care Institution

The Feasibility and Effect of Physical Activity With Computerized Upper Limb Training Strategy on Health Promotion for Stroke Wheelchair User in Long-term Care Institution

Most of the residents in long-term care institution were wheelchair users, however, it would limit the participation in physical activities, and thus increase the degree of disability as they excessively rely on wheelchair. Recently, with the development of rehabilitation technology, the clients can receive more individualized physical activities intervention. Moreover, using technology as an assistive modality would reduce the demand of manpower, and provide higher treatment intensity with repeated training and objective performance feedback. Based upon our previous study finding from the physical activity with computerized upper limb training system (PACUTS), we propose to build a training strategy of physical activity for stroke wheelchair user in long-term care institution and to analyze its feasibility as well as the treatment effects, in the next two years.

The mixed method design will be applied. In the qualitative research, we will focus on the experience of physical activity training and subject's "adoption and acceptance" of the PACUTS. In terms of the quantitative research, 50 residents who currently live in long-term care institution will be recruited. Double-blinded randomized control-group pretest-posttest design will be conducted. In the experiment group, the participant will receive the intervention of PACUTS for 12 weeks/ 5 sessions per week/ 30 minutes, at least, per session. In terms of control group, the participant will receive a regular treatment program and physical activities scheduled by occupational therapist. This study is expected to contribute to build a training strategy with computerized upper limb training system which can helpfully promote the participation in physical activities and health outcomes for w/c residents living in long-term care institution.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the past few years, the government has been focusing on community based care, the idea so-called aging-in-place. Therefore, the intervention model for residents in long-term care institution had been noticed by the researcher. Most of the residents in long-term care institution were wheelchair users, however, it would limit the participation in physical activities, and thus increase the degree of disability as they excessively rely on wheelchair. Recently, with the development of rehabilitation technology, the clients can receive more individualized physical activities intervention. Moreover, using technology as an assistive modality would reduce the demand of manpower, and provide higher treatment intensity with repeated training and objective performance feedback. Based upon our previous study finding from the physical activity with computerized upper limb training system (PACUTS), we propose to build a training strategy of physical activity for stroke wheelchair user in long-term care institution and to analyze its feasibility as well as the treatment effects, in the next two years.

The mixed method design will be applied. In the qualitative research, we will focus on the experience of physical activity training and subject's "adoption and acceptance" of the PACUTS. Through in-depth interview, field notes and different interviewers, the qualitative data analysis with phenomenology design will be applied. In terms of the quantitative research, 50 residents who currently live in long-term care institution will be recruited. Double-blinded randomized control-group pretest-posttest design will be conducted. In the experiment group, the participant will receive the intervention of PACUTS for 12 weeks/ 5 sessions per week/ 30 minutes, at least, per session. In terms of control group, the participant will receive a regular treatment program and physical activities scheduled by occupational therapist. Participants will be assessed by outcome measures, including Time Up and Go Test, Box and Block Test, Grip Strength Assessment, the Ruff 2 & 7 Selective Attention Test, System Usability Scale, Barthel Index, SF-36 and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Descriptive statistics, independent-sample t test, paired-sample t test or mixed type 2-way ANOVA will be performed for data analysis. This study is expected to contribute to build a training strategy with computerized upper limb training system which can helpfully promote the participation in physical activities and health outcomes for w/c residents living in long-term care institution.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Department of Occupational Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently living in a long-term care institution
  • Stoke, onset over 6 months
  • Wheelchair user
  • Maintain sitting 30 minutes
  • No cognition impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aphsia
  • Dementia, Cancer and MS
  • PNS impairment
  • Cardiopulmonary dysfunction
  • Visual impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: computer intervention group
stroke subjects with wheelchair users completed computer screen tasks with affected arm or bilateral arm movement
subject received programs for upper arm movement training with providing computer screen task activities
Active Comparator: conventional long-term care services group
stroke subjects with wheelchair users receive conventional long-term care services
stroke subjects with wheelchair users receive conventional long-term care services

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Box and Block Test
Time Frame: pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test Box and Block Test after 6 weeks' intervention)
The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity. It is a quick, simple and inexpensive test. It can be used with a wide range of populations, including clients with stroke.
pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test Box and Block Test after 6 weeks' intervention)
Grip Strength Assessment
Time Frame: pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test Grip Strength Assessment after 6 weeks' intervention)
Grip strength is a measure of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by one's forearm muscles. It can be used as a screening tool for the measurement of upper body strength and overall strength.
pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test Grip Strength Assessment after 6 weeks' intervention)
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: only post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
The System Usability Scale, or SUS, is a simple survey that provides a high-level score for the usability of a product.
only post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
Moss Attention Rating Scale
Time Frame: pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test Moss Attention Rating Scale after 6 weeks' intervention)
The MARS was designed as an observational rating scale to provide a reliable, quantitative and ecologically valid measure of attention-related behavior after TBI.
pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test Moss Attention Rating Scale after 6 weeks' intervention)
upper limb endurance
Time Frame: pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test upper limb endurance after 6 weeks' intervention)
can raise your hands several times in a minute
pre-test, post-test(Change from pre-test upper limb endurance after 6 weeks' intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barthel Index
Time Frame: pre-test and post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
The Barthel Scale/Index (BI) is an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). Ten variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.
pre-test and post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: pre-test and post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) as a shorter alternative of the SF-36 is largely used in health outcomes surveys.
pre-test and post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
Falls Efficacy Scale-International
Time Frame: pre-test and post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)
are measures of "fear of falling" or, more properly, "concerns about falling", which are suitable for use in research and clinical practice.
pre-test and post-test(after 6 weeks' intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jyh-Jong Chang, PhD, Kaohsiung Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all collected IPD

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting one year after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For Meta-analysis study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on computer task intervention

Subscribe