A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream With Phototherapy in Participants With Vitiligo

February 14, 2025 updated by: Incyte Corporation

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Combined With Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B Phototherapy in Participants With Vitiligo

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream with or without phototherapy in adolescent and adult participants with non-segmental vitiligo for whom vitiligo area (facial and nonfacial) does not exceed 10% body surface area (BSA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M 7G1
        • Simcomed Health Ltd
      • Markham, Ontario, Canada, L3P 1X2
        • Lynderm Research Inc
    • California
      • Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708
        • First OC Dermatology
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • UC Davis Health
      • Sunnyvale, California, United States, 94086
        • Palo Alto Medical Foundation
    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809
        • Delricht Clinical Research - Clinedge - Ppds Baton Rouge
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20850
        • Aesthetic and Dermatology Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
      • Brighton, Massachusetts, United States, 02135
        • Metro Boston Clinical Partners
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605
        • University of Massachusetts Medical School
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Medical Center - New Center One
    • Texas
      • Pflugerville, Texas, United States, 78660
        • Austin Institute For Clinical Research Aicr Pflugerville
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202
        • Principle Research Solutions

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A clinical diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo with depigmented area including all of the following:

    1. ≥ 0.5 F-VASI on the face
    2. ≥ 3.0 T-VASI (body areas not including the face)
    3. Total body vitiligo area (facial and nonfacial) not exceeding 10% BSA.
  • Agree to discontinue all agents used to treat vitiligo from screening through the final safety follow-up visit. Over-the-counter preparations deemed acceptable by the investigator and camouflage makeups are permitted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No pigmented hair within any of the vitiligo areas on the face.
  • Other forms of vitiligo (eg, segmental) or other differential diagnosis of vitiligo or other skin depigmentation disorders.
  • Used depigmentation treatments (eg, monobenzone) for past treatment of vitiligo or other pigmented areas.
  • Previous adverse reaction to NB-UVB phototherapy that caused discontinuation of therapy.
  • Lack of response (little or no repigmentation) to prior NB-UVB phototherapy.
  • History of thromboembolic events (eg, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction).
  • Any other skin disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study cream application or study assessments.
  • Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection (eg, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, chicken pox) within 1 week before baseline.
  • Any serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that pose a significant risk to the participant; or interfere with interpretation of study data.
  • Recent use of topical or systemic medications (including biologics or JAK inhibitors), or laser or phototherapy to treat vitiligo. Note: Recent may be defined differently for different treatments.
  • Specific protocol-defined chemistry, hematology, and serological lab values.
  • Those who are pregnant, lactating or considering pregnancy during the period of study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A: Ruxolitinib + Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B Phototherapy (NB-UVB)
Participants will initially apply ruxolitinib 1.5%mg cream as a monotherapy. At week 12, those who have < 25% improvement in total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI25) will have NB-UVB phototherapy added to their ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID regimen. NB-UVB will be given 3 times per week starting at Week 12 through Week 48 (36 weeks). For participants who receive combination therapy, NB-UVB machines will be supplied by the sponsor for at home use during the study.
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% applied twice a day (BID).
NB-UVB (311-312 nm) phototherapy is an established treatment modality for vitiligo. Starting dose will be 200 mJ/cm2 and dose may be increased by 10% at each visit
Other Names:
  • Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B Phototherapy
Experimental: Group B: Ruxolitinib Monotherapy
Participants will apply ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID as monotherapy. Participants who have ≥ T-VASI25 at Week 12 will continue on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID alone.
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% applied twice a day (BID).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 body sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of body surface area [BSA] estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each body site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time Frame: up to approximately 52 weeks
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
up to approximately 52 weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥50% Improvement From Baseline in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI50) Score at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI75) Score at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
An F-VASI75 responder achieved at least 75% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement From Baseline in the Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI90) Score at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
An F-VASI90 responder achieved at least 90% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥50% Improvement From Baseline in the Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI50) Score at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
A T-VASI50 responder achieved ≥50% improvement from Baseline in T-VASI, calculated with contributions from 6 body sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to the nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each body site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in the Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI75) Score at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
A T-VASI75 responder achieved ≥75% improvement from Baseline in T-VASI, calculated with contributions from 6 body sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to the nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each body site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement From Baseline in the Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI90) Score at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
A T-VASI90 responder achieved ≥90% improvement from Baseline in T-VASI, calculated with contributions from 6 body sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to the nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each body site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Baseline; up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in F-VASI at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = ([post-Baseline (BL) value minus BL value]/BL value) X 100.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 body sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each body site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from BL was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 body sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each body site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = ([post-BL value minus BL value]/BL value) X 100.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Facial Body Surface Area (F-BSA) at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically to the jawline and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically to the jawline and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = ([post-Baseline (BL) value minus BL value]/BL value) X 100.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (T-BSA) at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA at Each Post-Baseline Visit
Time Frame: Baseline; up to Week 48
T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = ([post-BL value minus BL value]/BL value) X 100.
Baseline; up to Week 48
Plasma Concentration of Ruxolitinib at Weeks 4, 12, and 16
Time Frame: pre-application at Weeks 4, 12, and 16
The concentration of ruxolitinib in the plasma was assessed.
pre-application at Weeks 4, 12, and 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Haq Nawaz, md, Incyte Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be shared after the primary publication or 2 years after the study has ended for market authorized products and indications.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described in the Data Sharing section of the www.incyteclinicaltrials.com website. For approved requests, the researchers will be granted access to anonymized data under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitiligo

Clinical Trials on Ruxolitinib 1.5% cream

Subscribe