Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Formulations of Δ9-THC

January 31, 2023 updated by: LaSanta S A S

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of 3 Standard Formulations of Δ9-THC in Healthy Volunteers and Post-chemotherapy Patients in Colombia

Study based on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety and stability evaluation of 3 standardized formulations of THC, to be used in healthy volunteers and post-chemotherapy patients as an adjuvant in the symptomatic treatment of the latter in discomfort associated with cancer treatment, with the aim of possible new therapeutic entities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This evaluation project of 3 oral formulations of Δ9-THC will be carried out in two phases: Phase I evaluation of bioequivalences in healthy subjects and Phase II evaluation of safety and effectiveness comparing with the reference product (Dronabinol 5mg/mL), formulations derived from cannabis for the management of nausea, vomiting post chemotherapy and exploratory in cancer pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

334

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bogotá, Colombia, 110231
        • Lasanta S A S
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andres Turizo Smith, PharmB
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carlos Rodriguez Martinez, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers

In order to be eligible to be admitted to this study, healthy volunteers must:

  1. Being a person > 18 years of age
  2. Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study and be willing to give written informed consent
  3. Agree to abide by study restrictions and return for required evaluations.
  4. Signed written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria for patients

In order to be eligible to be admitted to this study, patients must:

  1. Being a person > 18 years of age
  2. Be a patient with documented chemotherapy treatment.
  3. Patients with any of the following cancers: breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, cervical, gastric and liver cancer.
  4. Have a life expectancy >1 year
  5. Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study and be willing to give written informed consent
  6. Agree to abide by study restrictions and return for required evaluations

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for healthy volunteers

To be eligible to be admitted to this study, the participant and/or patient must not:

  1. Recreational or medicinal use of cannabinoids in the last 3 months.
  2. Uses of current medications such as: immunomodulators, antibiotics, corticosteroids
  3. Hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product.
  4. Patients prescribed dronabinol between arrival and prior to screening/randomization
  5. Pregnancy or lactation
  6. Liver pathologies and/or CYP2A3, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms
  7. Opioid hypersensitivity
  8. Obesity
  9. Patients who have undergone concomitant immunotherapy with chemotherapy
  10. Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS).

Exclusion criteria for patients

To be eligible to be admitted to this study, the participant and/or patient must not:

  1. Patients who are null by mouth (NPO) at the time of randomization or who are expected to be NPO within the next 48 hours
  2. Patients who have received or are expected to receive neuraxial/locoregional blocks for pain in the next 48 hours.
  3. Recreational or medicinal use of cannabinoids in the last 3 months.
  4. Uses of current medications such as: immunomodulators, antibiotics, corticosteroids
  5. Hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product.
  6. Patients prescribed dronabinol between arrival and prior to screening/randomization
  7. Pregnancy or lactation
  8. Liver pathologies and/or CYP2A3, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms
  9. Opioid hypersensitivity
  10. Obesity
  11. Patients who have undergone concomitant immunotherapy with chemotherapy
  12. Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS). -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dronabinol 5mg/mL
Drug: Dronabinol (SYNDROS) Oral solution of SYNDROS (5 mg/mL)
Assessment of Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of THC oral formulations in 4 arms in healthy volunteers and patients post-chemotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Administration of different Cannabis oral formulations with THC as compared with Active comparator (DRONABINOL)
Experimental: THC F1
Drug: THC Oral solution of THC (5 mg/mL)
Assessment of Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of THC oral formulations in 4 arms in healthy volunteers and patients post-chemotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Administration of different Cannabis oral formulations with THC as compared with Active comparator (DRONABINOL)
Experimental: THC F2
Drug: THC:CBG Oral solution of THC (5 mg/mL) & CBG (5 mg/mL)
Assessment of Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of THC oral formulations in 4 arms in healthy volunteers and patients post-chemotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Administration of different Cannabis oral formulations with THC as compared with Active comparator (DRONABINOL)
Experimental: THC F3
Drug: THC:CBC Oral solution of THC (5 mg/mL) & CBC (5 mg/mL)
Assessment of Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of THC oral formulations in 4 arms in healthy volunteers and patients post-chemotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Administration of different Cannabis oral formulations with THC as compared with Active comparator (DRONABINOL)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetic assessment profile of THC formulations
Time Frame: 48 hours with a replicate 7 days after the first dose in healthy subjects and the same time but with successive doses in post-chemotherapy patients
Pharmacokinetics of THC by Assessment of Area Under the Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC(0-inf)) [ Time Frame: 0 hours (pre-dose), as well as at 0.12, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose ]
48 hours with a replicate 7 days after the first dose in healthy subjects and the same time but with successive doses in post-chemotherapy patients
Pharmacodynamic assessment profile of THC formulations: BPI
Time Frame: Post-chemotherapy patients for at least 20 days with a daily report
Brief pain inventory (BPI); The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning. The questions ask participants to rate their pain in the prior 24-hours OR prior 7-day on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where "0" indicates "No pain" and "10" indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine."
Post-chemotherapy patients for at least 20 days with a daily report
Pharmacodynamic assessment profile of THC formulations: DEQ
Time Frame: 48 hours with a replicate of 7 days after the first dose in healthy subjects and on the other hand post-chemotherapy patients for at least 20 days with a daily report
Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ);is used in studies of acute subjective response (SR) to a variety of substances. The DEQ consists of 11 questions: "Feel Drug", "Feel High", "Like Drug", and "Want More", "dislike the sensation", "any sensations", "feel a head rush", "like drug effect", "dislike any effects". To calculate the DEQ- 'Good Drug Effects'. Each question was measured on a scale with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100. 100 represents the highest score for that subjective state, and the higher the score, the worse the outcome
48 hours with a replicate of 7 days after the first dose in healthy subjects and on the other hand post-chemotherapy patients for at least 20 days with a daily report
No significant nausea in terms of the proportion of subjects with no significant nausea
Time Frame: Post-chemotherapy patients for at least 20 days with a daily report
To investigate THC oral formulations in terms of the proportion of patients with no significant nausea (none or mild nausea) following initiation of oral formulations of THC (dronabinol) in post-chemotherapy patients
Post-chemotherapy patients for at least 20 days with a daily report

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 14 days for healthy subjects, 20 days for post-chemotherapy patients
Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Oral Formulations of THC, Number of AEs during 14 days for healthy subjects and 20 days for post-chemotherapy patients vs active drug phase vs. Dronabinol active comparator
14 days for healthy subjects, 20 days for post-chemotherapy patients
Global Quality of Life (QoL) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: at least 20 days for post-chemotherapy patients

EORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) is an integrated system for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials.

Self-reported symptoms related to treatment. Each item is rated on a response scale 1 = not at all to 4 = very much and refer to the time frame "during the last days" EORTC QLQ-C30

at least 20 days for post-chemotherapy patients

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of THC oral formulations with Dronabinol as comparator

Subscribe