Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone With Familial Hypercholesterolemia (CARE-FH) (CARE-FH)

December 18, 2025 updated by: Samuel Gidding, Geisinger Clinic
Diagnosis rates of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are low in the United States, despite multiple guidelines and recommendations for screening and treatment of high cholesterol, to prevent heart attacks in those affected. Using a stepped-wedge design, the investigators plan to utilize tools from implementation science to improve uptake, acceptability, and sustainability of FH diagnostic programs in primary care settings. If successful, this study will provide tools generalizable to other health care systems to improve FH diagnosis rates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder (prevalence 1 in 250) that requires lifelong sustained medical care. Evidence-based guidelines for screening and treatment for FH exist. These include universal screening of children ages 9-11, of adolescents ages 18-20, and of adults ages 40 and above; approved diagnostic tools including lipid panels and genetic testing; and recommendations for initiation of lipid lowering medication. FH diagnosis is currently made too late in life, often after a premature heart attack has occurred creating a care gap that results in excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Diagnosing FH in the primary care setting would optimize treatment for individuals with FH and close this care gap. Utilizing tools from implementation science and human centered design, and by considering uptake, acceptability, and sustainability of programs related to FH care should improve earlier diagnosis. Implementation strategies that include insights from patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems are necessary. The long-term goal is to create an effective FH diagnosis program that is practical and sustainable in the real-world setting. The main objective of this project is to determine the uptake of an FH diagnosis program integrated into primary care practices to promote early identification of adult and pediatric patients that is generalizable to other healthcare settings. The research question is, does using a multi-level implementation strategy package, designed to address the specific needs of patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems, improve the diagnosis and activation of care management for individuals with FH. The specific aims are to: 1) to design a clinical trial to assess multi-level implementation strategies for improving FH diagnosis in an integrated health system, 2) compare FH diagnosis rates among primary care clinicians who receive the implementation strategy package versus those who do not, 3) to measure implementation success of an organized FH diagnosis program, and 4) to explore patient-related service and health outcomes related to an FH diagnosis program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

532

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Multiple Locations, Pennsylvania, United States, 00000
        • Geisinger Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care clinicians (pediatrician, community medicine, internal medicine) in the Geisinger Healthcare System

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Phase 1
Phased rollout to clinic sites across the the Geisinger system using stepped wedge design
Uptake of screening, diagnosis, and initiation of care management for FH
EHR tools to order labs, record results, and document FH care
Education regarding guidelines for identification and treatment of FH
Continuing medical education (CME) material for FH that is presented to
Notify patients simultaneously with clinicians about the need for screening
Clinical lipid champions
Provide aggregate level feedback to clinics on diagnosing FH
Develop the timeline for the stepped-wedge rollout to primary care
Other: Phase 2
Phased rollout to clinic sites across the the Geisinger system using stepped wedge design
Uptake of screening, diagnosis, and initiation of care management for FH
EHR tools to order labs, record results, and document FH care
Education regarding guidelines for identification and treatment of FH
Continuing medical education (CME) material for FH that is presented to
Notify patients simultaneously with clinicians about the need for screening
Clinical lipid champions
Provide aggregate level feedback to clinics on diagnosing FH
Develop the timeline for the stepped-wedge rollout to primary care
Other: Phase 3
Phased rollout to clinic sites across the the Geisinger system using stepped wedge design
Uptake of screening, diagnosis, and initiation of care management for FH
EHR tools to order labs, record results, and document FH care
Education regarding guidelines for identification and treatment of FH
Continuing medical education (CME) material for FH that is presented to
Notify patients simultaneously with clinicians about the need for screening
Clinical lipid champions
Provide aggregate level feedback to clinics on diagnosing FH
Develop the timeline for the stepped-wedge rollout to primary care
Other: Phase 4
Phased rollout to clinic sites across the the Geisinger system using stepped wedge design
Uptake of screening, diagnosis, and initiation of care management for FH
EHR tools to order labs, record results, and document FH care
Education regarding guidelines for identification and treatment of FH
Continuing medical education (CME) material for FH that is presented to
Notify patients simultaneously with clinicians about the need for screening
Clinical lipid champions
Provide aggregate level feedback to clinics on diagnosing FH
Develop the timeline for the stepped-wedge rollout to primary care
Other: Phase 5
Phased rollout to clinic sites across the the Geisinger system using stepped wedge design
Uptake of screening, diagnosis, and initiation of care management for FH
EHR tools to order labs, record results, and document FH care
Education regarding guidelines for identification and treatment of FH
Continuing medical education (CME) material for FH that is presented to
Notify patients simultaneously with clinicians about the need for screening
Clinical lipid champions
Provide aggregate level feedback to clinics on diagnosing FH
Develop the timeline for the stepped-wedge rollout to primary care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FH diagnosis rate (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
FH diagnosis rate, is achieving both the scheduling of a clinic visit and evidence the clinician, at that visit, has completed evidence-based FH diagnostic evaluation, defined as completing one of: using the FH clinic note to document care, adding FH diagnosis on the problem list, using the FH smart-set (or ordered a genetic test for FH), making a referral to the lipid clinic, or starting a statin for an evidence-based indication
Up to 45 months
Acceptability (Aim 3)
Time Frame: Month 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42
Clinician and patient satisfaction and self-efficacy with the FH diagnosis program
Month 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42
Timeliness (Aim 4)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Time to FH screen, time to diagnostic evaluation, time to statin initiation
Up to 45 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initiation medication use (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Initiation of lipid lowering medication by healthcare clinician
Up to 45 months
Lipid measurement (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Order of a lipid panel
Up to 45 months
Genetic testing (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Month 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42
Order of a genetic test for FH
Month 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42
Problem list diagnosis of FH (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Clinician adds diagnosis of FH to the patients problem list in the electronic health record
Up to 45 months
FH smartset (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Month 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42
Clinician uses and completes all field of the FH smartset
Month 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42
Best Practice Alert (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Clinician adheres to and acts on recommendation in the Best Practice Alert
Up to 45 months
FH Clinic Note (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Clinician completes the FH clinic note
Up to 45 months
Fidelity (Aim 3)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Documentation of adaptations to the FH diagnosis program
Up to 45 months
Cost (Aim 3)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Cost to implement the implementation strategy package
Up to 45 months
Function (Aim 4)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Return of genetic result to patient (if ordered and patient undergoes testing)
Up to 45 months
Function (Aim 4)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Reduction in lipid level from baseline to end of the study period
Up to 45 months
Function (Aim 4)
Time Frame: Up to 45 months
Patient side effects to medications
Up to 45 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laney K Jones, PharmD, MPH, Geisinger Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Samuel S Gidding, MD, Geisinger Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Available upon request from PIs

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Clinical Trials on FH diagnosis program

Subscribe