3D Printed PEEK Implants for Cranioplasty (PEEKCP)

February 2, 2024 updated by: Peter Siesjö, Skane University Hospital
This study is a non-randomised and single center study with patients needing an artificial skull bone eg cranioplasty. 40 patients will be implanted with in house manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants using a fused filament fabrication 3D printer. The primary aim is to ascertain safety and feasibility of the procedure. The secondary aim is to compare complication rates with conventional methods such as autologous bone and polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cranioplasty is the surgical repair of a congenital or cranial defects after head trauma, infection or decompressive craniectomy. Although some patients can tolerate cranial defects for varied periods of time, cranioplasty is mostly indicated due to the increased risk of additional brain trauma, local pain or impaired CSF circulation but also aesthetic and psychological issues. The gold standard for repair since many years is cranioplasty with autologous bones . However, sometimes it not feasible to use the patient's autologous bone due to infections, trauma, bone graft resorption and donor-site morbidity. To replace the autologous bone grafts several different materials have been used, or are in use, as titanium meshes, hydroxyapatite cement and plastic resins as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and porous polyethylene. Some of these have gathered increased interest due to advancements in technology for manufacture of these materials, and also the possibility to create custom made implants or moulds.

The present study aims to assay safety and feasibility of in house 3D printed medical grade PEEK implants in research persons with acquired skull defects.

The implants will be manufactured after 3D rendering from CT images of the skull defects, sterilised and aseptically inserted in the defects by means of a surgical intervention.

A safety interim analysis will be performed after inclusion of 10 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lund, Sweden, 22185
        • Department of Neurosurgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for cranioplasty
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No informed consent
  • Implant size greater than 12x12 cm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Cranioplasty PEEK
3D printed PEEK skull implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performed PEEK implants
Time Frame: At end of surgical procedure, up to 2 months after inclusion
Percentage of performed PEEK implants out of included patients.
At end of surgical procedure, up to 2 months after inclusion
Safety of PEEK implants
Time Frame: 1 year
Survival percentage of PEEK implants. Will be compared to historical PMMA and autologous bone implants.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exposure time of PEEK implants compared to PMMA implants.
Time Frame: During surgical procedure, up to 2 months after inclusion.
Compare exposure time for PEEK implant during surgery with historical PMMA implants made in 3D printed mold.
During surgical procedure, up to 2 months after inclusion.
Complications of PEEK implants
Time Frame: 12 months
Complications after PEEK implants other than those leading to extraction of implant will be compared to historical PMMA and autologous bone implants.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Einar Heiberg, MD, PhD, Skåne University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 26, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ver1.2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skull Defect

Clinical Trials on PEEK Cranioplasty

3
Subscribe