Effects of a Recreational Team Handball-based Programme on Health and Physical Fitness of Middle-aged and Older Men ((H4HM))

March 28, 2022 updated by: Susana Cristina Araújo Póvoas, University Institute of Maia

Dose-response Effects of a Recreational Team Handball-based Exercise Programme on Cardiovascular, Metabolic, Musculoskeletal and Physical Fitness Markers in Inactive Middle-aged and Older Male

The present study aims at analyzing the dose-response effects of a recreational team handball-based exercise programme on cardiovascular, metabolic, musculoskeletal and physical fitness markers of inactive middle-aged and older men, without previous experience with the sport. The researchers hypothesized a positive weekly training frequency effect on health and physical fitness outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Porto
      • Maia, Porto, Portugal, 4475-690
        • Univerisity of Maia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male participants; inactive with 50 or more years of age (i.e., not complying with the physical activity guidelines for the last 6 months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical contraindication to perform moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; incapacity to run or grip a ball.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Team Handball 1
Team handball group participants were instructed to perform one weekly 60-min recreational team handball training sessions for 16 weeks.
All training sessions consisted of a standardized 15-min warm-up (running, coordination, strength, flexibility and balance exercises), followed by 3x15-min periods of recreational team handball matches interspersed by 2-min breaks, performed in an indoor team handball court. The matches were played as small and formal game formats (4v4, 5v5, 6v6 or 7v7).
EXPERIMENTAL: Team Handball 2
Team handball group participants were instructed to perform two weekly 60-min recreational team handball training sessions for 16 weeks.
All training sessions consisted of a standardized 15-min warm-up (running, coordination, strength, flexibility and balance exercises), followed by 3x15-min periods of recreational team handball matches interspersed by 2-min breaks, performed in an indoor team handball court. The matches were played as small and formal game formats (4v4, 5v5, 6v6 or 7v7).
EXPERIMENTAL: Team Handball 3
Team handball group participants were instructed to perform three weekly 60-min recreational team handball training sessions for 16 weeks.
All training sessions consisted of a standardized 15-min warm-up (running, coordination, strength, flexibility and balance exercises), followed by 3x15-min periods of recreational team handball matches interspersed by 2-min breaks, performed in an indoor team handball court. The matches were played as small and formal game formats (4v4, 5v5, 6v6 or 7v7).
NO_INTERVENTION: Control Group
The control group participants were instructed to keep their regular daily physical activity for 16 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in maximal oxygen uptake
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Maximal oxygen uptake (mL/min/kg) was measured by pulmonary gas exchange measurements. The participants performed an incremental treadmill test until voluntary exhaustion in a laboratory, according to a standardized incremental protocol.
Baseline and week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) was measured in a laboratory by an automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor (multiparameter patient monitor, Omron Z207, Kyoto, Japan) according to standardized procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) was measured in a laboratory by an automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor (multiparameter patient monitor, Omron Z207, Kyoto, Japan) according to standardized procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in resting heart rate
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Resting heart rate (bpm) was measured in a laboratory by an automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor (multiparameter patient monitor, Omron Z207, Kyoto, Japan) according to standardized procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in whole-body mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Whole-body mass was measured by a whole-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in left arm total mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Left arm total mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in right arm total mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Right arm total mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in left leg total mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Left leg total mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in right leg total mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Right leg total mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in gynoid total mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Gynoid total mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in android total mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Android total mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in whole-body fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Whole-body fat mass was measured by a whole-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in left arm fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Left arm fat mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in right arm fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Right arm fat mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in left leg fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Left leg fat mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in right leg fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Right leg fat mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in gynoid fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Gynoid fat mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in android fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Android fat mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in whole-body lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Whole-body lean mass was measured by a whole-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in left arm lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Left arm lean mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in right arm lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Right arm lean mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in left leg lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Left leg lean mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in right leg lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Right leg lean mass was measured by a regional-body dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry following standard procedures
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in whole-body bone mineral density
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Whole-body bone mineral density dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry scans following standard procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in whole-body bone mineral content
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Whole-body bone mineral content dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry scans following standard procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Lumbar spine bone mineral density dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry regional scans following standard procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in lumbar spine bone mineral content
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Lumbar spine bone mineral content dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry regional scans following standard procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in femur bone mineral density
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Femur bone mineral density dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry regional scans following standard procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in femur bone mineral content
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Femur bone mineral content dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry regional scans following standard procedures.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in procollagen type-1 amino-terminal propeptide
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Plasma concentrations of biochemical bone turnover markers were analyzed by chemiluminescence method using a fully automated immunoassay system.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in osteocalcin
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Plasma concentrations of biochemical bone turnover markers were analyzed by chemiluminescence method using a fully automated immunoassay system.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in carboxy-terminal type-1 collagen crosslinks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Plasma concentrations of biochemical bone turnover markers were analyzed by chemiluminescence method using a fully automated immunoassay system.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in sclerostin
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Plasma concentrations of biochemical bone turnover markers were analyzed by chemiluminescence method using a fully automated immunoassay system.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in isometric upper body strength
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Isometric upper body strength was measured by a handgrip dynamometer (kg).
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in postural balance
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Postural balance was evaluated by the number of falls in a single-legged flamingo balance test.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in upper and lower body strength, and coordination
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Upper and lower body strength (N), and coordination (s) tests were measured according to Rikili and Jones ( 2013) standardized protocols.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in aerobic performance
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Aerobic performance (Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 test; YYIE1) (m) was evaluated on an indoor team handball court, acording to a standardized protocol.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in total cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dl) was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dl) was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in triglycerides
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Triglycerides (mg/dl) was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in glycosylated haemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Glycosylated haemoglobin (%) was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in glucose
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Glucose (mg/dl) was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in insulin
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Fasting blood insulin (µmol/L) was determined was determined by an automated analyzer.
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in total antioxidant status
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Total antioxidant status (TAS) (mmol/L) was measured in plasma samples using AU5800 (Beckman-Coulter®, USA)
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in glutathione reductase
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Glutathione reductase (GR) (U/L) was measured in plasma samples using AU5800 (Beckman-Coulter®, USA)
Baseline and week 16
Within-group changes from baseline to 16 weeks, and between-group changes in week 16, in glutathione peroxidase
Time Frame: Baseline and week 16
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (U/L) was measured in plasma samples using AU5800 (Beckman-Coulter®, USA)
Baseline and week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 12, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEFADE 19 2019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Aging

Clinical Trials on Recreational Team Handball programme

3
Subscribe