Observational Study of the Use of 8% Capsaicin Patch in Children 0 to 18 Years Old (CAPSULE)

September 22, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Observational Study of the Use of 8% Capsaicin Patch in Children 0 to 18 Years

Patients aged less than 18-y with validated 8% capsaicin patch treatment in routine healthcare will be offered to participate the study. If they accept it as well as their parents, they will be included in the study .

Medical data will be recorded and at home, the child or his family will collect pain assessment data.

Tolerance will be monitored at home by phone call from investigational team every 24 hours until normalization. (Less than 24 hours for 75%, 100% to 72 hours on unpublished personal series.) Children will be assessed via scales at inclusion and 1-month, 3-month and 6-month.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Children and teenagers aged less than 18-y, with chronic localized neuropathic pain, may be treated by capsaicin 8% patch. If this indication is validated in pediatric chronic pain consultation, they will be offered to participate the study. If they accept it as well as their parents, they will be included in the study.

Treatment application will follow recommendations and be realized in out patient clinic with trained nurses.

Tolerance will be assessed by phone call every 24 Hours by investigational team until normalization. Expected duration is less than 24 Hours for 75% patients and 100 % at 72 Hours, from unpublished personal data.

Efficacy will be monitored with usual pain and neuropathic pain tools, adapted to age and cognitive capacities, one month after application.

Treatment may be done three times if needed with a three month interval between each capsaicin patch application.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80054
      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Angers
        • Contact:
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
      • Bourg-en-Bresse, France, 01000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHR Bourg en Bresse
        • Contact:
      • Brest, France, 29609
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU CAEN
        • Contact:
      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Grenoble
        • Contact:
      • Lille, France, 59037
      • Limoges, France, 87042
      • Lyon, France
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Marseille
        • Contact:
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
      • Nancy, France, 54511
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Nancy
        • Contact:
      • Nantes, France, 44093
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Robert Debré
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75571
      • Rouen, France, 76031
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Toulouse
        • Contact:
      • Villejuif, France, 94805

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients aged less than 18-y with chronic localized neuropathic pain and capsaicin 8% patch indication validated in a pediatric chronic pain center.

patient with intellectual development disabilities are accepted

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic localized neuropathic pain
  • capsaicin 8% patch treatment indication validated in a pediatric chronic pain center
  • agreement for participation by child and parents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • already treated with capsaicin 8% patch in the same body area
  • already treated in the same study in an other investigation center
  • non willing to participate or parents not willing participation to the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success or failure of pain treatment : Number of patients with success and number of patients with failure of treatment with capsaicin
Time Frame: 3 months after last patch application
The success is defined by the absence of use of pain medication during the three months after the end of capsaicin application protocol
3 months after last patch application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indication of capsaicin use
Time Frame: At recruitment visit
Indication for treatment with capsaicine will be collected (context of emergence of pain, descriptive data)
At recruitment visit
Success or failure of pain treatment : Number of patients who use or not use antalgic and/or comfort medication (including for improving sleep)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Use of antalgic and/or comfort medication (including for improving sleep). Success is de fined by the non use of antalgic and/or comfort medication (including for improving sleep)
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain evaluation for child aged from 0 to 4 years
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Score of HECP (Hetero-Evaluation of Child Pain) questionnaire, score from 0 to 10 (a higher score means a worse outcome)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain evaluation for child with intellectual deficiency
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Score of PAGID (Pain Assessment Grid - Intellectual Deficiency) or PPP (Pediatric Pain Profile) questionnaire, higher scores are worse outcome
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain description for child aged from 5 to 11 years
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Global score and subscores of NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Inventory), questionnaire with support, score from 0 to 100, higher score is worse outcome
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain diagnostic for child aged from 5 to 11 years
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Global score of pPN4 (Paediatric Neuropathic Pain 4 points) questionnaire, score from 0 to 10, higher score is worse item
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain evaluation for child aged from 5 to 11 years
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Score of pVAS (Paediatric Visual Analogic Scale) or NS (Numeric Scale) or Revised Faces Pain Scales, score from 0 to 10, higher score is worse outcome
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain description for child aged from 12 to 17 years
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Global score and subscores of NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Inventory) questionnaire without support, score from 0 to 100, higher score is worse outcome
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain evaluation for child aged from 12 to 17 years
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Score of VAS (Visual Analogic Scale) or NS (Numeric Scale), score from 0 to 10, higher score is worse outcome
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Neuropathic pain diagnostic for child aged from 12 to 17 years
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Global score of NP4 questionnaire (Neuropathic Pain 4 points), score from 0 to 10, higher score is worse item
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Functional disability evaluation for child aged from 5 to 17 years
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Global score of FDI (Functional Disability Inventory) questionnaire, score from 0 to 60, higher score is worse outcome
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description for child aged from 5 to 17 years : number of painful access
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Number of painful access (crisis) in one day
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description for child aged from 5 to 17 years : duration of painful access
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Mean duration of painful access (crisis) in minutes
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description for child aged from 5 to 17 years : trigger factor of the painful access
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Type of trigger factor that leads to the painful access
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description for child aged from 5 to 17 years : sensation
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Description of sensation reported by the child (sensation spontaneously described, qualitative data)
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description (observed signs) for child aged from 0 to 4 years or with intellectual deficiency
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Description of observed signs related to pain
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description (sleep quality) for child aged from 0 to 4 years or with intellectual deficiency
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Description of sleep quality (night awakening / week)
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Pain description (child behaviour) for child aged from 0 to 4 years or with intellectual deficiency
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Description of child behaviour related to pain (antalgic position)
Baseline and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after patch application.
Tolerance assessment (duration of patch application)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Duration of patch application in minutes
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Tolerance assessment (number of patch used)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Number of patch used during the application
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Tolerance assessment (cutaneous state)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Cutaneous state (burning, erythema, healthy skin, other) just after patch removal
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Tolerance assessment (skin aspect)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months : 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch application
Local aspect of skin : presence of erythema Yes or No, in the hours and days following patch application
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months : 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch application
Tolerance assessment (icing)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months : 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch application
Need for icing (YES/NO) against pain
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months : 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch application
Tolerance assessment (rescue medication)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months : 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch application
Intake of rescue medication against pain (YES/NO)
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months : 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch application

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe J Le Moine, MD, CHRU of Brest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 12, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Data collection

Subscribe