Nutritional Support in Patients With Nutritional Risk. How we Can Improved the Prognosis and Quality of Life

March 28, 2022 updated by: Pierre Singer, Rabin Medical Center

Nutritional Support in Patients Who Have Been Diagnosed at Nutritional Risk in the Hospital and Discharged Home. How we Can Improved the Prognosis and Quality of Life.

Background: Many malnourished hospital patients remain after discharge. We aimed to enhance the meal experience after discharge by delivering meals together with physical support at the home and tested if this increased food intake affected survival and quality of life.

Patients and Methods: 60 discharged patients suffering from nutritional (MUST>2) and financial frailty were included. Control group (C) took their regular nutrition at home for 6 months and study group (S) received a daily dinner tray sponsored by the municipality. Hazalla philanthropic organization encouraged the patients at lunch for 6 months. Body composition (Quadstat 4000, Bodystat, UK), energy requirements (Fitmate- COSMED, Italy) were measured at recruitement. Primary outcome was 180 days survival. In addition, in the recruitment stage and after a period of 3 and 6 months, depression and anxiety questionnaire (HADS), quality of Life Questionnaire-SF36and FIM questionnaire - designed to examine the level of independence of patients with disability were performed at days 0, 90 and 180. Statistical analysis used T- Test and ANOVA Repeated Measures. The study was approved by local IRB.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Petah Tikva, Israel
        • Rabin Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MUST =>2
  • Region of living Bney-Brak or Petah-tikwa
  • Fine cognitive state

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Progressive cancer
  • Dementia
  • Fiddling by PEG or Enteral nutrient via Naso gastric tube
  • Psychiatrics disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Measurements and questioners
• The patient will be measured with an indirect calorimetry device (Fitmate - COSMED Srl. Rome, Italy) to assess the nutritional requirement.
• The body composition test will be performed by the Bodystat®4000 Bioimpedance Device (BIA 4000, Bodystat, UK). .

At 3 times point , in the recruit + 3 month and 6 month 3 questioners will be given:

HADS, Quality of life 36SF and FIM

Active Comparator: Group A
Receiving Food dish every night for 6 months Measurements and questioners
• The patient will be measured with an indirect calorimetry device (Fitmate - COSMED Srl. Rome, Italy) to assess the nutritional requirement.
• The body composition test will be performed by the Bodystat®4000 Bioimpedance Device (BIA 4000, Bodystat, UK). .

At 3 times point , in the recruit + 3 month and 6 month 3 questioners will be given:

HADS, Quality of life 36SF and FIM

All patients will be assessed for nutritional risk estimates (MUST) as well as a nutritional PANDORA estimate that predicts mortality, the Pandora estimate will be measured even after 3 and 6 months

Group A - will receive a dish of food every evening by a person employed by a rescue organization for 6 months

At the end of the meal once a week

  • All dishes will be photographed at the end of the meal by Android camera, iPhone
  • A NUTRITION DAY success photo form will be completed and collected .
Active Comparator: Group B
Receiving Food dish every night for 6 months, at this group extra attention have given to the dish plating and appearance by professional (BOCUSE), Measurements and questioners
• The patient will be measured with an indirect calorimetry device (Fitmate - COSMED Srl. Rome, Italy) to assess the nutritional requirement.
• The body composition test will be performed by the Bodystat®4000 Bioimpedance Device (BIA 4000, Bodystat, UK). .

At 3 times point , in the recruit + 3 month and 6 month 3 questioners will be given:

HADS, Quality of life 36SF and FIM

All patients will be assessed for nutritional risk estimates (MUST) as well as a nutritional PANDORA estimate that predicts mortality, the Pandora estimate will be measured even after 3 and 6 months Group b - will receive a food dish every evening by a person employed by a rescue organization with improved appearance of a plate for 6 months.

At the end of the meal once a week

  • All dishes will be photographed at the end of the meal by Android camera, iPhone
  • A NUTRITION DAY success photo form will be completed and collected .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improve quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
HADS questionnaire (hospital anxiety ans depression scale), scale 0-21. 0-7: normal; 8-10: borderline; 11-21: abnormal.
6 months
Improve quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
FIM questionnaire (functional indepence measure) scale 0 to 7, 1= total asistance, 7=complete independence, the highst score the best.
6 months
Improve quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
sf-36 questionnaire (short form health survey), scale 0-100, the highest the score the less disability
6 months
changed Mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
six mounth follow up through ATD (American Trans Data Corp)
6 months
changed financials costs per patient in health system
Time Frame: 6 months
follow up through electronic medical records
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Singer, Prof, Rabin Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0390-16-RMC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Indirect calorimetric

Subscribe