Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis With Standard of Care and Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy

March 31, 2022 updated by: Gianna Maria Nardi, University of Roma La Sapienza

Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis With Standard of Care and Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy: A Parallel-Arm Clinical Trial

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate in a cohort of patients with peri-implant mucositis: (a) the efficacy of professional mechanical debridement therapy assisted using Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy on the reduction of periodontal indexes (b) the reduction of total oxidative salivary stress.

Material and Methods Forty subjects with a diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to the study group (mechanical debridement therapy assisted using Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy) or control group (mechanical debridement therapy alone). The study duration was 6 months. Data on plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and pain relief on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded at T0, T1 (14 days), T2 (1 month) and T3 (6 months). Group differences were assessed using Student's t-test and Pearson's Chi-squared test of homogeneity

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bari, Italy, 70121
        • Roberto Felice Grassi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, 30-60 years old.
  • With diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis.
  • Plaque index (PI) ≥ 40%.
  • Al least one implant site with PPD≥4 mm, BOP+ and suppuration.
  • No uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, bone metabolism disorders, no autoimmune diseases (lichen planus, pemphigoid, pemphigus and systemic lupus erythematosus).
  • No pharmacological therapies, no chemo-radiotherapies.
  • No smoking (>10 cigarettes/day), alcohol and/or drug consumption.
  • No pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • No allergy.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: peri-implant mucositis treated with standard of care-professional mechanical debridement
patients with peri-implant mucositis are treated with standard of care, i.e. professional mechanical debridement
The Bioptron® Device provides polarized visible polychromatic noncoherent light with 90 W; light wavelength = 480-3400 nm; degree of polarization = 95%; specific power = 40 mW/cm2; energy density = 2.4 J/cm2. The duration of each treatment session was 10 min. Bioptron light was positioned 10 cm from the oral mucosa and a mouth opener was positioned for the entire duration of the session. Two weekly sessions during the first 4 weeks of treatment were applied.
Experimental: peri-implant mucositis treated with photobiomodulation in addition to standard treatment
patients with peri-implant mucositis are treated with photobiomodulation in addition to standard treatment
The Bioptron® Device provides polarized visible polychromatic noncoherent light with 90 W; light wavelength = 480-3400 nm; degree of polarization = 95%; specific power = 40 mW/cm2; energy density = 2.4 J/cm2. The duration of each treatment session was 10 min. Bioptron light was positioned 10 cm from the oral mucosa and a mouth opener was positioned for the entire duration of the session. Two weekly sessions during the first 4 weeks of treatment were applied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periodontal chart-Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)
Probing pocket depth (PPD). PPD is a periodontal index. It is used to measure the depth of the tissue surrounding the dental implant; with notches measured in millimeters. The probe is placed in between the dental implant and gums and measures the depth of what is called the periodontal pocket- the space between the dental implant and the surrounding gums and bone.
Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)
Periodontal chart-Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)
Probing pocket depth (PPD). PPD is a periodontal index. It is used to measure the depth of the tissue surrounding the dental implant; with notches measured in millimeters. The probe is placed in between the dental implant and gums and measures the depth of what is called the periodontal pocket- the space between the dental implant and the surrounding gums and bone.
Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)
Periodontal chart-Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)
Probing pocket depth (PPD). PPD is a periodontal index. It is used to measure the depth of the tissue surrounding the dental implant; with notches measured in millimeters. The probe is placed in between the dental implant and gums and measures the depth of what is called the periodontal pocket- the space between the dental implant and the surrounding gums and bone.
Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)
Periodontal chart-Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)
Probing pocket depth (PPD). PPD is a periodontal index. It is used to measure the depth of the tissue surrounding the dental implant; with notches measured in millimeters. The probe is placed in between the dental implant and gums and measures the depth of what is called the periodontal pocket- the space between the dental implant and the surrounding gums and bone.
Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)
Periodontal chart-Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)

Bleeding on probing (BOP). Bleeding on probing (BOP) is a parameter to measure soft tissue inflammation. It is measured with the use of a dental probe. The grading is :

  • 0: normal colour of gingiva, no inflammation, no bleeding;
  • 1: slight inflammation; no bleeding;
  • 2: moderate inflammation; presence of bleeding on probing;
  • 3: severe inflammation; tendency to spontaneus bleeding.
Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)
Periodontal chart-Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)

Bleeding on probing (BOP). Bleeding on probing (BOP) is a parameter to measure soft tissue inflammation. It is measured with the use of a dental probe. The grading is :

  • 0: normal colour of gingiva, no inflammation, no bleeding;
  • 1: slight inflammation; no bleeding;
  • 2: moderate inflammation; presence of bleeding on probing;
  • 3: severe inflammation; tendency to spontaneus bleeding.
Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)
Periodontal chart-Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)

Bleeding on probing (BOP). Bleeding on probing (BOP) is a parameter to measure soft tissue inflammation. It is measured with the use of a dental probe. The grading is :

  • 0: normal colour of gingiva, no inflammation, no bleeding;
  • 1: slight inflammation; no bleeding;
  • 2: moderate inflammation; presence of bleeding on probing;
  • 3: severe inflammation; tendency to spontaneus bleeding.
Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)
Periodontal chart-Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)

Bleeding on probing (BOP). Bleeding on probing (BOP) is a parameter to measure soft tissue inflammation. It is measured with the use of a dental probe. The grading is :

  • 0: normal colour of gingiva, no inflammation, no bleeding;
  • 1: slight inflammation; no bleeding;
  • 2: moderate inflammation; presence of bleeding on probing;
  • 3: severe inflammation; tendency to spontaneus bleeding.
Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)
Periodontal chart- Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)

Plaque index (PI). Plaque index is used to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on dental implant surfaces. The grading is :

  • 0: no visible plaque;
  • 1: thin plaque layer detectable by scraping;
  • 2: moderate plaque layer; visible to the naked eye;
  • 3: abundant plaque layer.
Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)
Periodontal chart- Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)

Plaque index (PI). Plaque index is used to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on dental implant surfaces. The grading is :

  • 0: no visible plaque;
  • 1: thin plaque layer detectable by scraping;
  • 2: moderate plaque layer; visible to the naked eye;
  • 3: abundant plaque layer.
Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)
Periodontal chart- Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)

Plaque index (PI). Plaque index is used to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on dental implant surfaces. The grading is :

  • 0: no visible plaque;
  • 1: thin plaque layer detectable by scraping;
  • 2: moderate plaque layer; visible to the naked eye;
  • 3: abundant plaque layer.
Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)
Periodontal chart- Plaque index (PI)
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)

Plaque index (PI). Plaque index is used to evaluate the level and rate of plaque formation on dental implant surfaces. The grading is :

  • 0: no visible plaque;
  • 1: thin plaque layer detectable by scraping;
  • 2: moderate plaque layer; visible to the naked eye;
  • 3: abundant plaque layer.
Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain relief
Time Frame: Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)
Pain relief assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11)
Patients were assessed before study beginning (baseline)
Pain relief
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)
Pain relief assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11)
Patients were assessed at 6 weeks (T1)
Pain relief
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)
Pain relief assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11)
Patients were assessed at 12 weeks (T2)
Pain relief
Time Frame: Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)
Pain relief assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11)
Patients were assessed at 24 weeks (T3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Roberto F Grassi, Prof, University of Bari Aldo Moro

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant Failed

Clinical Trials on Photobiomodulation with Bioptron Hyperlight Therapy

Subscribe