Varithena Versus Endothermal Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein (VERITAS) (VERITAS)

March 2, 2026 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

A Phase 4 Randomized Trial Comparing Varithena to Endothermal Ablation for the Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein

The purpose of this study is to observe insights into the benefits of Varithena compared to Endothermal Ablation (ETA) in the treatment of the great saphenous vein.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To collect comparative evidence on patient reported outcomes of Varithena compared to ETA when used to treat the incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV). ETA will include either radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation according to the site's standard practice. To provide long term (1-year, 2-year, and 3-year) outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Darien, Connecticut, United States, 06820
        • Vascular Care Connecticut
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20057
        • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
    • Louisiana
      • Houma, Louisiana, United States, 70360
        • Cardiovascular Institute of the South
    • Maine
      • South Portland, Maine, United States, 04106
        • Vein Healthcare Center
    • New Jersey
      • Englewood, New Jersey, United States, 07631
        • Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • UT Physicians Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
    • Washington
      • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004
        • Lake Washington Vascular

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Primary GSV incompetence, defined as reflux > 0.5 seconds on Duplex ultrasound in a single limb (Note the contralateral limb can have varicosities or SVI if intervention is not required within 3 months i.e. asymptomatic)
  • Failed conservative therapy (compression, diet, exercise, leg elevation)
  • CEAP Clinical Condition Classification C2 - C6
  • Vein diameter 5-10mm, inclusive
  • GSV treatable length > 10cm
  • Superficial venous disease manifest by clinical symptoms (rVCSS ≥ 4)
  • Able to comprehend and sign an informed consent document and complete written study questionnaires
  • Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up visits (7-days, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months post-procedure)
  • Willingness to comply with post-treatment compression protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to polidocanol, xylocaine, or epinephrine
  • Deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 3 months prior to randomization or hypercoagulable disorder
  • Post thrombotic deep vein disease above the calf veins
  • Pregnancy or lactating (within 30 days of randomization)
  • Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease or ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) < 0.8
  • Previous treatment to targeted incompetent GSV or previous superficial thrombophlebitis in targeted GSV
  • Previous venous intervention in affected limb in past 3 months
  • Local aneurysmal GSV segments
  • Inability to walk unaided
  • Inability to wear post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
  • Patients with clinically significant reflux of the small saphenous vein (SSV) or anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV)
  • In the clinical judgement of the investigator, patient who will require ipsilateral deep venous intervention within 3 months following randomized treatment
  • In the clinical judgement of the investigator, patient who will require contralateral venous intervention (superficial or deep) within 3 months following randomized treatment
  • Patient on therapeutic anticoagulants
  • Active malignancy
  • Life expectancy < 2 years
  • Documented COVID-19 infection currently or within 2 months prior to randomization
  • Enrollment in another clinical trial that could confound the endpoint within 3 months prior to screening or within 3 months following enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Varithena®
Varithena® (polidocanol injectable foam) 1%
Varithena® (polidocanol injectable foam) 1%
Active Comparator: FDA-approved ETA systems
FDA-approved ETA systems, including Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) systems or Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) systems.
FDA-approved ETA systems, including Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) systems or Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) systems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Varicose Veins Symptoms Questionnaire (VVSymQ)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month post treatment
Mean change in points of total score on Varicose Veins Symptoms Questionnaire (VVSymQ) between baseline and 3-month post treatment. VVSymQ scores range from 0 to 25, where 0 represents no symptoms and 25 represents all 5 symptoms experienced all of the time.
Baseline to 3-month post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins

Clinical Trials on Varithena®

Subscribe