Identification of Non-motor Brain Areas Involved in Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke (NOMO-Stroke)

June 10, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Why: Upper-limb recovery post-stroke is challenging. Rehabilitation, aiming to induce plasticity takes an important place in patients' treatment. The last years, non-invasive brain stimulation of the primary motor cortex has gained the communities' interest, allowing direct modification of neural excitability and thus impacting plasticity. Yet, research outcomes remain inconclusive to date. It's expected this to be related to patient heterogeneity including mild to severe motor deficits, and suboptimal site of stimulation. It might be questioned whether M1 stimulation is preferable over that of higher association areas like the parietal or premotor cortex.

What: The aim of the study is to identify alternative brain regions to stimulate, related to improved motor quality after a severe initial deficit. How: by following motor recovery over time, by co-recording movement kinematics and brain activity.

Because: Stimulation of the novel identified regions may improve motor recovery after stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients' brain activity and connectivity during an elbow flexion/extension task will be evaluated at 2 weeks (V0), 3 months (V1) and 6 months (V2) post-stroke. Between V0 and V1, patients will receive standard in-care rehabilitation at the physical and rehabilitation medicine department (PMR) of Montpellier's University Hospital: 120 minutes a day, for 5 days/week (orthopedic training, sitting/standing balance, walking, sensorimotor training - including 2 and 3 dimensional reach to grasp exercises with and without vision, functional electrical stimulation of the upper-limb, finger pinching exercises). On the day of imaging, a clinical evaluation will be performed to evaluate patients upper-limb function (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale) and capacity (WOLF motor function test & Box and Block test). The imaging protocol includes a 3DT1 for anatomical reference, a functional task-based MRI with block-design (30s rest alternated with 30s of activity) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to quantify anatomical connectivity. During imaging, participants will lay on their back with their arm stretched along their body. A short auditory signal will inform patient when to start/stop moving. During movement, only the elbow will be rhythmically flexed and extended at a self-selected comfortable pace in the vertical plane. The motor task will be performed with both the paretic and ipsilesional upper-limb, in random order. Patients that are unable to move, will be asked to keep trying to move during the activity block.

Material: 3.0T whole-body magnet MRI (Prisma Siemens, Germany), MRI compatible 3D motion camera's (Qualisys, France).

Imaging data will be acquired by the I2FH research platform at the Montpellier University Hospital Data treatment: functional Imaging data will be preprocessed following standard procedures, including reorientation to the anterior commissure, slice-time correction, realignment, co-registering & normalization to 3DT1 anatomical template, smoothing. Subsequent group analyses using general linear models, will be corrected for multiple comparisons. Imaging data will be analyzed by the I2FH research platform. 3D-Movement time-series of upper-limb displacement will be analyzed by Euromov, using matlab the mathworks. The movement will be quantified by its shaping (e.g. Amplitude/Frequency) and structure (e.g. Fluency/Directness). Clinical testing will be performed as part of standard care evaluations at the physical rehabilitation medicine department of the hospital of Montpellier and Nimes.

Schedule visit:

Patients: V0: ~10 post-stroke, V1: ~3 months post-stroke, V2: ~6 months post stroke. Clinical testing will be performed on the day (+/- 1) of the MRI session.

Healthy subjects will be evaluated once

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Montpellier University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients admitted at the University hospital of Montpellier with an ischemic stroke that are meeting the inclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria patients post-stroke:

  • 18-85 yrs,
  • First ever ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery,
  • Initial severe motor deficit (fugl-Upper limb assessment score <30/66),
  • Written consent.

Exclusion criteria patients post-stroke:

  • The presence of secondary neurological or psychiatric deficits,
  • Strong hemineglect (bell-test);
  • Aphasie >3/5 on the Boston scale,
  • Bilateral stroke,
  • Hemorraghic stroke,
  • MRI contra-indications,
  • Pregnancy/breastfeading,
  • Patient under curatele,
  • Medical urgency.

Inclusion criteria healthy subjects:

  • Age matching (+/- 5 yrs),
  • Sexe matching,
  • Written consent.

Exclusion criteria healthy subjets:

  • Neurological or psychological deficits;
  • MRI contra-indations;
  • Pregnancy/breastfeeding,
  • Personunder curatele.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Post-stroke

People with a first ever ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery presenting severe motor deficits of the upper-limb at onset.

The patients

IMR is a non-invasive imaging technology that produces three dimensional detailed anatomical images. It is often used for disease detection, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring. It is based on sophisticated technology that excites and detects the change in the direction of the rotational axis of protons found in the water that makes up living tissues.
Controls
Age and sexe matched healthy subjects without known neurological and or psychological deficits.
IMR is a non-invasive imaging technology that produces three dimensional detailed anatomical images. It is often used for disease detection, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring. It is based on sophisticated technology that excites and detects the change in the direction of the rotational axis of protons found in the water that makes up living tissues.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of brain activity during motor task during post-stroke recovery
Time Frame: ~10days, 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.
Functional MRI imaging with upper-limb elbow flexion in a blocked-design. Analysis with integrated movement kinematics that are registered simulateously.
~10days, 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
fMRI task-based and resting state brain connectivity
Time Frame: at ~10days, 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.
Resting-state and functional MRI with upper-limb elbow flexion
at ~10days, 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging anatomical brain connectivity
Time Frame: at ~10days, 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.
DTI imaging
at ~10days, 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Isabelle LAFFONT, PHD,MD, Montpellier University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Subscribe