Wrist Extensor MEP Up-conditioning for Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (uMEP)

June 16, 2025 updated by: Blair Dellenbach, Medical University of South Carolina

Can Increasing Motor Evoked Potential Size Improve Upper Extremity Motor Function in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury?

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between common clinical assessments and measurements of the function of brain-spinal cord-muscle connections, and to examine the effects of training a brain-spinal cord-muscle response in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. A transcranial magnetic stimulator (TMS) is used for examining brain-to-muscle pathways. This stimulator produces a magnetic field for a very short period of time and indirectly stimulates brain cells with little or no discomfort. The target muscle is the wrist extensor (extensor carpi radialis) muscle that bends the wrist back. It is hypothesized that training the wrist extensor muscle response to transcranial magnetic stimulation will increase the strength of the brain-to-muscle pathway, which will improve the ability to move the arm.

It is hoped that the results of this training study will help in developing therapy strategies for individuals, promoting better understanding of clinical assessments, and understanding treatments that aim to improve function recovery in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

This study requires 30 visits, and each visit will last approximately 1.5 hours.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Blair Dellenbach, MSOT
  • Phone Number: 843-792-6313
  • Email: stecb@musc.edu

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:
          • Blair Dellenbach, MSOT
          • Phone Number: 843-792-6313
          • Email: stecb@musc.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. a history of injury to spinal cord at or above C6
  2. neurologically stable (>6 mo post SCI)
  3. medical clearance to participate
  4. weak wrist extension at least unilaterally
  5. expectation that current medication will be maintained without change for at least 3 months. Stable use of anti-spasticity medication (e.g., baclofen, diazepam, tizanidine) is accepted. In participants with bilateral wrist extension weakness, the more severely impaired arm is studied.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. motoneuron injury
  2. medically unstable condition
  3. cognitive impairment
  4. a history of epileptic seizures
  5. metal implants in the cranium
  6. implanted biomedical device in or above the chest (e.g., a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant)
  7. no measurable MEP elicited in the ECR
  8. unable to produce any voluntary ECR EMG activity
  9. extensive use of functional electrical stimulation to the arm on a daily basis
  10. pregnancy (due to changes in posture and potential medical instability).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MEP Wrist Extensor Up-Conditioning
This is a training intervention in which the brain-spinal cord-muscle pathways are strengthened in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a type of brain stimulation, will be used to elicit a muscle response from the wrist extensor (extensor carpi radialis), the muscle the bends the wrist back.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the excitability/strength of the brain-spinal cord-muscle pathway at the brain level as measured by the Motor Evoked Potential
Time Frame: Baseline and final training session (approximately 2.5 months)
An increased average MEP size (mV) would indicate increased excitability/strength of the brain-spinal cord-muscle pathway
Baseline and final training session (approximately 2.5 months)
Change in ability to move the arm as measured by the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Maximum score of 57 points
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
An increase in ARAT score indicates an improvement in the ability to move the arm
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Change in ability to move the arm as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
An increase in the FMA score indicates better movement of the arm. Maximum score of 66 points
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Change in gross manual dexterity as measured by the Box and Block Test (BBT)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
An increased number of blocks moved in 60s indicates increased gross manual dexterity
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Change in fine motor ability and finger dexterity as measured by the Nine Hole Peg Test
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Decreased amount of time (s) to place and remove pegs in a peg board indicates improved fine motor ability and finger dexterity
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Change in strength as measured by Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Increased score on MMT indicates increased strength in the muscle being tested. The examiner grades the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale. 0: No muscle activation; 1: Trace muscle activation, such as a twitch, without achieving full range of motion; 2: Muscle activation with gravity eliminated, achieving full range of motion; 3: Muscle activation against gravity, full range of motion; 4: Muscle activation against some resistance, full range of motion; 5: Muscle activation against examiner's full resistance, full range of motion.
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Change in sensation on the back and palm of the hand as measured by the Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Ability to detect increasingly thinner monofilaments indicates increased sensation
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
Change in spasticity as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (mAS)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol
The mAS score ranges from 0: normal muscle tone to 4: rigid in flexion or extension. A decrease in mAS indicates decreased spasticity.
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blair Dellenbach, MSOT, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on MEP Operant Up-conditioning of the Wrist Extensor

Subscribe