- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05334095
Angio-seal VIP Versus Perclose ProGlide for Closure of the Femoral Artery in Peripheral Vascular Disease
April 18, 2022 updated by: Xiongjing Jiang
Angio-seal VIP Versus Perclose ProGlide for Closure of the Femoral Artery in Peripheral Vascular Disease: a Prospective Single-center Randomized Non-inferiority Trial
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy (device deployment characteristics and performance) and safety (adverse access site related events) of Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Vascular Devices) for femoral access site closure in patients undergoing peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures in comparison with Angio-seal VIP (St.
Jude Medical).
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Prospective, single-center, randomized (1:1), open-label, non-inferiority study in 1062 patients comparing Perclose ProGlide (test device) to the Angio-seal VIP (standard comparator).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
1062
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
- Recruiting
- Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is ≥18 and < 85 years of age.
- Patient is willing to provide written informed consent prior to study device use.
- Patient is undergoing a peripheral vascular diagnostic and/or interventional procedure via femoral arterial access.
- Patients' arterial puncture site is in the common femoral artery confirmed by a femoral angiogram, and ≥10mm away from the ostium of the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) and the bifurcation of superficial femoral artery and the profunda femoris artery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The femoral access site has been punctured within 30 days, or deployed with a collagen-based hemostasis device within 90 days, or a suture-mediated closure device.
- Patients having a hematoma, pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous fistula present prior to sheath removal confirmed by a femoral angiogram.
- Patients with minimum femoral artery calcium which is fluoroscopically visible at access site or femoral artery diameter stenosis greater than 50%.
- Ankle-brachial index (ABI) of the ipsilateral limb of access site cannot be measured due to severe peripheral artery disease (PAD).
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Perclose ProGlide
Perclose ProGlide 6F Suture-Mediated Closure (SMC) System
|
After peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, patients are randomized to receive Perclose ProGlide.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Angio-seal VIP
Angio-seal VIP Vascular Closure Device
|
After peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, patients are randomized to receive Angio-seal VIP
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of the device successfully deployed and absence of the major vascular complications necessitating aggressive treatments (surgical or percutaneous repair etc.) at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days post procedure
|
Deployment procedure success is defined as haemostasis after the delivery and release of a closure device, manual compression is no longer needed or less than 5 minutes, and no more closure devices are needed. Major vascular complications include:
|
30 days post procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Minor ipsilateral access site complications at 30 days and generally no aggressive treatment is required
Time Frame: 30 days post procedure
|
Minor ipsilateral access site vascular complications included:
|
30 days post procedure
|
|
Incidence at 180 days of the composite endpoint of major vascular complications necessitating aggressive treatments (surgical or percutaneous repair etc.)
Time Frame: 180 days post procedure
|
Major vascular complications include:
|
180 days post procedure
|
|
Deployment procedure time
Time Frame: within 24 hours of device deployment
|
Deployment procedure time was defined as elapsed time from the first skin break to final closure (skin to skin time)
|
within 24 hours of device deployment
|
|
Time to haemostasis from removing the sheath until haemostasis
Time Frame: within 24 hours of device deployment
|
Haemostasis is considered as insignificant bleeding on the bandage or small continuous oozing, manual compression is no longer needed or less than 5 minutes.
|
within 24 hours of device deployment
|
|
Patients' comfort level during the deployment of the closure device using the visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: within 5 minutes of device deployment
|
0 cm means no pain, while 10 cm means the worst imaginable pain or the worst pain one had experienced
|
within 5 minutes of device deployment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 20, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
June 1, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 18, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
April 19, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 19, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 18, 2022
Last Verified
April 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-ZX09
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.