- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05334732
Improving Communication and Adherence in Black Breast Cancer Survivors (Sisters Informing Sisters) (SIS)
August 24, 2026 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
Improving Communication and Adherence in Black Breast Cancer Survivors
The purpose of this study is to test an evidence-based intervention designed to increase adherence to systemic therapy in Black women compared to enhanced usual care.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Black women continue to experience worse breast cancer outcomes, which may be due to inadequate adherence to systemic therapies that can be improved via patient-centered communication.
We developed and piloted the Sisters Informing SistersSM (SIS) intervention (survivor-led skill-building sessions and culturally tailored materials to activate Black breast cancer survivors in their medical encounters) and obtained promising findings.
This project will compare in a two-arm RCT the impact of SIS vs. enhanced usual care (treatment recommendation summary form) on patient-centered communication and systemic treatment adherence; SIS tools may be integrated within existing clinical and support services.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
225
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center
-
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20007
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- Massey Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-identify as Black
- Newly diagnosed (~4 weeks post-definitive surgery and prior to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) patients (stage I-III)
- Eligible for chemotherapy or endocrine therapy according to NCCN guidelines, but have not initiated systemic therapy
- Ability to read and speak English
- Ability to provide meaningful consent as determined by trained study personnel and/or a member of the patient's care team
- No prior cancer treatment (other than skin cancer) in the two years preceding enrollment
- Physicians Must be a license doctor of study patient(s)
- Ability to speak English
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sisters Informing Sisters Sessions
The intervention is peer-based and in concert with our theoretical model, builds upon positive role-modeling of the survivor coach to the patient, addresses behavioral expectations/capacities, and uses Motivational Interviewing (MI) techniques.
The intervention includes a culturally relevant coach's manual and a patient workbook that will be used to facilitate the coaching sessions.
|
The participants in this arm will be seen by a trained survivor coach and receive culturally tailored intervention materials.
|
|
No Intervention: Enhanced Usual Care
Women in the EUC arm will receive usual care that includes standardized information in the public domain (NCI treatment information booklet).
This booklet was chosen to provide women with national-level recommendations regarding treatment recommendations.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessing Study Adherence Behaviors- Initiation
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
Initiation will be measured for all therapies based on the number of participants starting at least one cycle of prescribed therapy
|
36 Months
|
|
Assessing Study Adherence Behaviors- Delay of Adjuvant or Endocrine Therapy.
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
Initiation Delay of therapy will be measured by the number of participant's days from definitive surgery date to the date of her first cycle of adjuvant systemic therapy.
Classifications of delay are dichotomized according to published reports (<60 days primary measure).
|
36 Months
|
|
Assessing Study Adherence Behaviors- Overall Chemotherapy Adherence
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
Overall chemotherapy adherence will be measured by the number of participants that complete chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy adherence will be measured as having at least 80% or more of the recommended doses.
Adherence will be calculated based on the planned and expected number of cycles divided by the number received (i.e., 6 chemotherapy cycles received/8 expected = 75% adherent).
|
36 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assess Perceived Involvement in Care: PCC Outcomes - Level of Engagement in Decision Making
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
The number of participants level of engagement in decision-making will be assessed by utilizing The Perceived Involvement in Care (PCC) 13-Item scale.
PCC will be assessed via direct observation of medical encounters through a quantitative analysis of audiotaped visits.
|
36 Months
|
|
Assess Perceived Involvement in Care: PCC Outcomes - Perceptions of Doctor Behaviors by determining a more patient-centered encounter vs a more biomedically focused encounter.
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
The number of participants level of engagement in perceptions of doctor behaviors will be assessed by utilizing The Perceived Involvement in Care (PCC) 13-Item scale.
PCC will be assessed via direct observation of medical encounters through a quantitative analysis of audiotaped visits.
A value >1 indicates a more patient-centered encounter, whereas a value <1 indicates a more biomedically focused encounter.
|
36 Months
|
|
Assess Perceived Involvement in Care: PCC Outcomes - Perceptions of Patient Behaviors by determining Perceptions of Doctor Behaviors by determining a more patient-centered encounter vs a more biomedically focused encounter
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
The number of participants level of engagement in perceptions of patient behaviors will be assessed by utilizing The Perceived Involvement in Care (PCC) 13-Item scale.
PCC will be assessed via direct observation of medical encounters through a quantitative analysis of audiotaped visits.
A value >1 indicates a more patient-centered encounter, whereas a value <1 indicates a more biomedically focused encounter.
|
36 Months
|
|
Determine Process and Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
Assess the number of participants who Consent to Participate in the trial
|
36 Months
|
|
Determine Process and Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
Assess the number of participants that participate in the trial after they sign consent
|
36 Months
|
|
Determine Process and Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: 36 Months
|
Assess the Cost of the trial per arm.
Personnel time costs will be obtained by multiplying the staff time.
costs by hourly average wage and fringe benefit rates.
The staff time will include the training to identify at-risk women and the time spent administering/reviewing study materials including the treatment summary request form
|
36 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Vanessa B Sheppard, Ph.D, Virginia Commonwealth University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 12, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
April 19, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 26, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 24, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MCC-19-15740
- HM20016396 (Other Identifier: Virginia Commonwealth University)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
There is no plan to make IPD available.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.