Improving Communication and Adherence in Black Breast Cancer Survivors (Sisters Informing Sisters) (SIS)

April 2, 2026 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

Improving Communication and Adherence in Black Breast Cancer Survivors

The purpose of this study is to test an evidence-based intervention designed to increase adherence to systemic therapy in Black women compared to enhanced usual care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Black women continue to experience worse breast cancer outcomes, which may be due to inadequate adherence to systemic therapies that can be improved via patient-centered communication. We developed and piloted the Sisters Informing SistersSM (SIS) intervention (survivor-led skill-building sessions and culturally tailored materials to activate Black breast cancer survivors in their medical encounters) and obtained promising findings. This project will compare in a two-arm RCT the impact of SIS vs. enhanced usual care (treatment recommendation summary form) on patient-centered communication and systemic treatment adherence; SIS tools may be integrated within existing clinical and support services.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Recruiting
        • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lucile Adams-Campbell
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Recruiting
        • Medstar Washington Hospital Center
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identify as Black
  • Newly diagnosed (~4 weeks post-definitive surgery and prior to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) patients (stage I-III)
  • Eligible for chemotherapy or endocrine therapy according to NCCN guidelines, but have not initiated systemic therapy
  • Ability to read and speak English
  • Ability to provide meaningful consent as determined by trained study personnel and/or a member of the patient's care team
  • No prior cancer treatment (other than skin cancer) in the two years preceding enrollment
  • Physicians Must be a license doctor of study patient(s)
  • Ability to speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sisters Informing Sisters Sessions
The intervention is peer-based and in concert with our theoretical model, builds upon positive role-modeling of the survivor coach to the patient, addresses behavioral expectations/capacities, and uses Motivational Interviewing (MI) techniques. The intervention includes a culturally relevant coach's manual and a patient workbook that will be used to facilitate the coaching sessions.
The participants in this arm will be seen by a trained survivor coach and receive culturally tailored intervention materials.
No Intervention: Enhanced Usual Care
Women in the EUC arm will receive usual care that includes standardized information in the public domain (NCI treatment information booklet). This booklet was chosen to provide women with national-level recommendations regarding treatment recommendations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing Study Adherence Behaviors- Initiation
Time Frame: 36 Months
Initiation will be measured for all therapies based on the number of participants starting at least one cycle of prescribed therapy
36 Months
Assessing Study Adherence Behaviors- Delay of Adjuvant or Endocrine Therapy.
Time Frame: 36 Months
Initiation Delay of therapy will be measured by the number of participant's days from definitive surgery date to the date of her first cycle of adjuvant systemic therapy. Classifications of delay are dichotomized according to published reports (<60 days primary measure).
36 Months
Assessing Study Adherence Behaviors- Overall Chemotherapy Adherence
Time Frame: 36 Months
Overall chemotherapy adherence will be measured by the number of participants that complete chemotherapy. Chemotherapy adherence will be measured as having at least 80% or more of the recommended doses. Adherence will be calculated based on the planned and expected number of cycles divided by the number received (i.e., 6 chemotherapy cycles received/8 expected = 75% adherent).
36 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess Perceived Involvement in Care: PCC Outcomes - Level of Engagement in Decision Making
Time Frame: 36 Months
The number of participants level of engagement in decision-making will be assessed by utilizing The Perceived Involvement in Care (PCC) 13-Item scale. PCC will be assessed via direct observation of medical encounters through a quantitative analysis of audiotaped visits.
36 Months
Assess Perceived Involvement in Care: PCC Outcomes - Perceptions of Doctor Behaviors by determining a more patient-centered encounter vs a more biomedically focused encounter.
Time Frame: 36 Months
The number of participants level of engagement in perceptions of doctor behaviors will be assessed by utilizing The Perceived Involvement in Care (PCC) 13-Item scale. PCC will be assessed via direct observation of medical encounters through a quantitative analysis of audiotaped visits. A value >1 indicates a more patient-centered encounter, whereas a value <1 indicates a more biomedically focused encounter.
36 Months
Assess Perceived Involvement in Care: PCC Outcomes - Perceptions of Patient Behaviors by determining Perceptions of Doctor Behaviors by determining a more patient-centered encounter vs a more biomedically focused encounter
Time Frame: 36 Months
The number of participants level of engagement in perceptions of patient behaviors will be assessed by utilizing The Perceived Involvement in Care (PCC) 13-Item scale. PCC will be assessed via direct observation of medical encounters through a quantitative analysis of audiotaped visits. A value >1 indicates a more patient-centered encounter, whereas a value <1 indicates a more biomedically focused encounter.
36 Months
Determine Process and Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: 36 Months
Assess the number of participants who Consent to Participate in the trial
36 Months
Determine Process and Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: 36 Months
Assess the number of participants that participate in the trial after they sign consent
36 Months
Determine Process and Implementation Outcomes
Time Frame: 36 Months
Assess the Cost of the trial per arm. Personnel time costs will be obtained by multiplying the staff time. costs by hourly average wage and fringe benefit rates. The staff time will include the training to identify at-risk women and the time spent administering/reviewing study materials including the treatment summary request form
36 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vanessa B Sheppard, Ph.D, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MCC-19-15740
  • HM20016396 (Other Identifier: Virginia Commonwealth University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to make IPD available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on SIS TALK Back Intervention

Subscribe