The Impact of Feedback Informed Treatment in Floating Support Service (FIT)

The Impact of Feedback Informed Treatment in Floating Support Service - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT) is a systematic feedback method. FIT is based on two simple questionnaires and aims to assess and improve the effectiveness of therapeutic treatment. Treatment outcomes are assessed with the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), a four-item self-report instrument measuring client functioning in the area of quality of life. Therapeutic alliance is assessed using the four-item Session Rating Scale (SRS). In FIT the feedback from the client is used to continuous adjustment and improvement of therapy. SFI will study the effect of using feedback in social work with floated support in the municipality of Copenhagen. Floating Support is a service that provides housing related support to vulnerable citizens to enable them to maintain their independence in their own home. The project is based on three different types of floating support. The aim of floating support is to improve the citizen's mental, physical and social well-being and thereby makes it more likely that the citizen can live independently at home. The study is a randomized controlled trial in which half of the caseworkers are allocated to be trained in the use of FIT, while the other half serves as a control group and will continue to work as usual. SFI is studying whether FIT can help to improve the impact of the floating support service on the citizen's mental, physical and social well-being and the citizens' likelihood of living in their own homes.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Quality of Life
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Feedback Informed Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was designed as a cluster randomized controlled trial, where the investigators randomized 65 support workers to a treatment group (that used FIT) or a control group (that did not use FIT) at the beginning of the experiment. The investigators used block randomization within each unit to ensure that the number of support workers was evenly distributed between the treatment and control groups within each organizational unit. The investigators generated the random sequence using SAS.

When a support worker resigned during the experiment, another support worker with the same allocation took over the resigned worker's clients. If a new support worker was employed during the experiment in a unit with an even number of workers, the support worker was randomized to either the treatment group or the control group by simple randomization. If the unit had an uneven number of support workers, the new support worker was allocated to a group that ensured the unit kept the same uneven number of treatment and control workers.

The study included clients who had already begun in the support service before the experiment started and clients that started in the support service during the experiment. If a support worker only had one or two contacts with a new client, the client was not included in the study.

The study period was 16 months and ended when FIT was implemented in the control group.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 1162
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Denmark
  • Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-1052
    • SFI the Danish National Centre for Social Research

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Citizens who will receive floating support at the municipality of Copenhagen

Exclusion Criteria:

• Citizens who refuses to get the support. If the caseworkers do not think the citizen will need further support.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment group; Clients in the treatment group received the usual floating support service as described for the control group together with feedback. The support workers received feedback from the clients through the ORS and SRS scales of the feedback tool (Bargmann and Robinson 2011). The support worker evaluated the progress of the outcome for the client and the alliance between the support worker and the client from session to session.	Behavioral: Feedback Informed Treatment; FIT is based on two simple questionnaires and aims to assess and improve the effectiveness of therapeutic treatment. Treatment outcomes are assessed with the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), a four-item self-report instrument measuring client functioning in the area of quality of life. Therapeutic alliance is assessed using the four-item Session Rating Scale (SRS). In FIT the feedback from the client is used to continuous adjustment and improvement of therapy
No Intervention: Control group; Clients in the control group received the usual floating support service without Feedback. Therefore, there was no systematic feedback between clients and support workers in the control group. The service was provided in the clients' homes, and there was no fixed limit of sessions for the support. The support covered any problem, including setting up tenancies, working with clients around practical things, so they could live independently, making sure that clients received all relevant benefits and helping clients with access to physical and mental health services. Some support workers saw their clients on a weekly basis, but there was a large variation in the frequency of meetings. Furthermore, the duration of the support service varied, from a few weeks to several years.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
WHO5 wellbeing scale	The investigators measured the participants wellbeing using the WHO5 wellbeing scale	1-15 month after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Drop outs	Number of Drop outs from the floating service	1-15 month after baseline
Successful support	It floating support service has been successful. Service stopped by caseworker because goal for service reached.	1-15 month after baseline
Social relations	Social relations measured by items from WHO100	1-15 month after baseline
Physical wellbeing	Physical wellbeing measured with items from WHO100	1-15 month after baseline
Length of floating support service	The investigators measured treatment duration as the length of the floating support service in the experiment period	1-15 month after baseline
Number of eviction cases	As a measure of possible eviction, the investigators used the mandatory notification sent to the municipality when a citizen living in the public housing sector is subject to an eviction case sent to the Danish bailiff's court.	1-15 month after baseline
General health	To measure general health, the investigators used a single global item, that has been used in the SF-36 questionnaire	1-15 month after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research
• Collaborators: Copenhagen Municipality, Denmark
• Investigators: Study Director: Kræn B Jensen, PhD, VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): May 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 12, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): September 12, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 8, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 26, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): May 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 27, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 25, 2023
• Last Verified: July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Partners for change outcome management system; Feedback-informed treatment; Routine Outcome management
• Other Study ID Numbers: SFI 2808

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO