- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05366257
Real-world Resource Use and Costs of CAR-T Therapies in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Real-world Resource Use and Costs of CAR-T Therapies in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Inpatient and Outpatient Settings
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A retrospective, non-interventional cohort study was used to address the study objectives. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of real-world HRU and healthcare reimbursement costs associated with CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
Eligible adult patients with r/r DLBCL who were treated with CAR-T therapy or allo-HSCT between January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019 were identified from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 100% Medicare Database. The CAR-T cohort was further classified into CAR-T IP and CAR-T OP cohorts based on the infusion setting.
The index date was defined as the date of CAR-T therapy administration or allo-HSCT. Baseline period was defined as three months prior to the index date. Study period was defined from the index date to the end of health plan coverage based on insurance enrollment file or death, whichever occurred earlier.
Two sets of comparisons on HRU and healthcare reimbursement costs were conducted, one between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T, and the other between patients who received CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
East Hanover, New Jersey, United States, 07936-1080
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
CAR-T cohort:
- Patients had at least one International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD- 10) diagnosis code for DLBCL.
- Patients received CAR-T therapy following DLBCL diagnosis. The administration date of CAR-T therapy was defined as the index date. Patients who received both CAR-T therapy and allo-HSCT were classified based on the first treatment that the patient received
- Patients were at least 18 years of age as of the index date
- Patients had at least three months of continuous eligibility in the Medicare Part A and Part B data before the index date. Since 2019 Part D data is not available in the current data cut, eligibility requirement in the Part D data was not required
Patients were further classified into CAR-T IP and CAR-T OP cohorts depending on where the administration occurred.
Allo-HSCT cohort:
- Patients had at least one ICD-10 diagnosis code for DLBCL.
- Patients received allo-HSCT following DLBCL diagnosis. The date of allo-HSCT procedure was defined as the index date. Patients who received both CAR-T therapy and allo-HSCT were classified based on the first treatment the patient received
- Patients were at least 18 years of age as of the index date
- Patients had at least three months of continuous eligibility in the Medicare Part A and Part B data before the index date. Since 2019 Part D data is not available in the current data cut, eligibility requirement in the Part D data was not required
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients had a medical claim associated with a clinical trial (ICD-9 CM code V70.7; ICD-10 CM code Z00.6) during one month before and after the index date
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
CAR-T: Inpatient (IP) Cohort
Patients received CAR-T infusion in IP setting
|
infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL
|
CAR-T: Outpatient (OP) Cohort
Patients received CAR-T infusion in OP setting
|
infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL
|
Allo-HSCT cohort
Patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
|
Patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean length of follow-up in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Mean length of follow up was reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with IP visit in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with IP visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP admissions in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP admissions were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP days in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with IP visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU stays in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU stays were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU days in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU days were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with OP visit in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with OP visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of OP visits in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of OP visits were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with ER visit in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with ER visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ER visits in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ER visits were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) between IP vs. OP infusion of CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Total healthcare reimbursement costs in CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Total healthcare reimbursement costs, including medical service costs and pharmacy costs, inflated to 2020 US dollars (USD) were reported in CAR-T IP and CAR-T OP cohorts.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean length of follow-up for CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Mean length of follow up was reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with IP visit in CAR-T vs allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with IP visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP admissions in CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP admissions were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP days in CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of IP days were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU stays in CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU stays were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU days in CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ICU days were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with OP visit in CAR-T vs allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with OP visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of OP visits in CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of OP visits were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with ER visit in CAR-T vs allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of patients with ER visit were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ER visits in CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Number of ER visits were reported to compare Health Resource Use (HRU) of CAR-T therapy vs. allo-HSCT among patients with r/r DLBCL.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
IP re-admission/admission among CAR-T IP and OP cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
IP re-admission/admission were reported to assess post-infusion IP admission/readmission among patients with r/r DLBCL who received CAR-T therapy.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
AE rate during the study period among CAR-T cohorts
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Rate of adverse events (AEs) were reported among patients with r/r DLBCL who received CAR-T therapy.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Cost of AEs among CAR-T cohorts during the study period
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Cost per AE event were reported among patients with r/r DLBCL who received CAR-T therapy.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Total healthcare reimbursement costs in CAR-T vs allo-HSCT cohort
Time Frame: throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Total healthcare reimbursement costs, including medical service costs and pharmacy costs, defined as the amount paid by Medicare, inflated to 2020 USD were reported in overall CAR T and allo-HSCT cohorts.
|
throughout the study, approximately 2 years ( January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2019)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CCTL019CUS08
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterSanofi; Columbia University; Medical College of Wisconsin; University of Rochester and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingDiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States
-
University Health Network, TorontoNot yet recruitingDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)Canada
-
Hoffmann-La RocheRecruitingDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States
-
2seventy bioRecruitingDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States
-
AmgenMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedRelapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States, Germany, Spain, Australia, Netherlands, France
-
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi ONLUSCompletedDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Elderly Patients (>65 Years)Italy
-
Arbeitsgemeinschaft medikamentoese TumortherapieHoffmann-La RocheCompletedDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Follicular NHL Grade 3bHong Kong, Thailand, Sweden, Taiwan, Mexico, Austria, Serbia, China, Czech Republic, Australia, Malaysia, Croatia, Israel, South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav... and more
-
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi - ETSNot yet recruitingClassical Hodgkin Lymphoma | Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL) | Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)Italy
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActinium PharmaceuticalsRecruitingDiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma | B-ALL | DLBCL | DLBCL, Nos Genetic Subtypes | B ALL | Dlbcl-Ci | DLBCL Unclassifiable | DLBCL Activated B-Cell Type | DLBCL Germinal Center B-Cell Type | HGBL | HGBL, NosUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruitingLymphoma | Lymphoma, B-Cell | DLBCL - Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma | Large B-cell Lymphoma | Large-cell Lymphoma | Mediastinal B-Cell Diffuse Large Cell LymphomaUnited States
Clinical Trials on CAR-T
-
Hebei Senlang Biotechnology Inc., Ltd.RecruitingLymphoma | Multiple Myeloma | Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaChina
-
Nexcella Inc.Not yet recruitingLight Chain (AL) AmyloidosisUnited States
-
Bellicum PharmaceuticalsSuspendedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | HER2-positive Gastric Cancer | Solid Tumor, Adult | HER-2 Gene Amplification | HER-2 Protein OverexpressionUnited States
-
Southwest Hospital, ChinaUnknownLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseChina
-
Chunrui LiNanjing IASO Biotechnology Co., LtdRecruitingPlasma Cell Leukemia | Relapsed/Refractory Multiple MyelomaChina
-
Medical College of WisconsinChildren's Hospital and Health System Foundation, WisconsinCompletedLymphoma, B-Cell | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin | Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Small Lymphocytic LymphomaUnited States
-
Zhejiang UniversityYake Biotechnology Ltd.RecruitingMultiple Myeloma | New Diagnosis TumorChina
-
Peking University People's HospitalNot yet recruitingT-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
-
Zhejiang UniversityYake Biotechnology Ltd.Not yet recruitingAcute Myeloid LeukemiaChina
-
University College, LondonEnrolling by invitationMultiple MyelomaUnited Kingdom