Diagnostic Yield of Intranodal Forceps Biopsies in Mediastinal Adenopathy

April 9, 2026 updated by: Khalil Diab, George Washington University

Evaluating the Diagnostic Yield and Specimen Quality With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Intranodal Forceps Biopsies in Patients With Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy: A Prospective Analysis

The investigators will compare endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with intranodal forceps biopsy (EBUS-IFB) as it relates to the rate of diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is prospective, single center randomized comparative study to determine the diagnostic yield and specimen quality of endobronchial ultrasound guided intranodal forceps biopsy of patients with suspected sarcoidosis based solely on imaging. This will be a single group study and will compare transbronchial needle aspiration via 19 or 21-gauge needle with intranodal forceps biopsy.

The study aims to answer a knowledge gap a as to whether the diagnostic yield and specimen quality of EBUS-TBNA with a 19G needle is less than those obtained by 1.9mm or greater intranodal forceps biopsy. The study proposed here will add to the field by further elucidating whether this procedure is beneficial for the diagnosis as it pertains to suspected sarcoidosis.

The anticipated required enrollment is 55 patients to achieve an α of 0.05 and β of 0.2. This assumes an unassisted diagnostic yield of 62.5% with standard of care EBUS-TBNA as reported in Ray et al, and a diagnostic supplementation to 80% yield with intranodal forceps biopsies.

References

  1. Oki, M., Saka, H., & Sako, C. (2004). Bronchoscopic miniforceps biopsy for mediastinal nodes. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, 11(3), 150-153.
  2. Herth FJ, Morgan RK, Eberhardt R, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided miniforceps biopsy in the biopsy of subcarinal masses in patients with low likelihood of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jun; 85(6):1874-8.
  3. Chrissian A, Misselhorn D, Chen A. Endobronchial-ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2011;92(1):284-288.
  4. Franke KJ, Bruckner C, Szyrach M, Ruhle KH, Nilius G, Theegarten D. The contribution of endobronchial ultrasound-guided forceps biopsy in the diagnostic workup of unexplained mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. Lung. 2012;190(2):227-232.
  5. Herth FJF, Schuler H, Gompelmann D, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy with transbronchial needle forceps: a pilot study. European Respiratory Journal. 2012;39(2):373-377.
  6. Darwiche K, Freitag L, Nair A, et al. Evaluation of a novel endobronchial ultrasound-guided lymph node forceps in enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. Respiration. 2013;86(3):229-236.
  7. Ray AS, Li C, Murphy TE, et al. Improved diagnostic yield and specimen quality with endobronchial ultrasound-guided forceps biopsies: a retrospective analysis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2020;109(3):894-901

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • The George Washington University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Radiologic evidence of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy
  • Attending radiologist or pulmonologist reports a possible diagnosis of sarcoidosis
  • Age 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria*:

These are the characteristics that a participant must NOT have in order to be eligible to participate in the study.

Order Number Criteria

  • Severe pulmonary hypertension
  • Inability to undergo general anesthesia
  • Severe coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
  • Previously diagnosed sarcoidosis
  • Patient presently taking clopidogrel
  • Patient deemed to be high risk for general anesthesia per anesthesiologist
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Mediastinitis
  • Acute Hypercarbic Respiratory Failure (pCO2 >55mmHg)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: EBUS-TBNA
These will be the patient who undergo EBUS-TBNA only without EBUS-IFB
Patients with mediastinal adenopathy will undergo EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA during the same procedure to compare the yield of this procedure with EBUS-TBNA alone.
Other Names:
  • EBUS-IFB
Experimental: EBUS-TBNA + EBUS-IFB
These will be the individuals who undergo EBUS-TBNA followed by EBUS-IFB in the same procedure
Patients with mediastinal adenopathy will undergo EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA during the same procedure to compare the yield of this procedure with EBUS-TBNA alone.
Other Names:
  • EBUS-IFB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Yield
Time Frame: 1 year
Diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA + EBUS-IFB compared to EBUS-TBNA alone
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
Duration of combined EBUS-TBNA +IFB procedure compared to TBNA alone
1 year
Complications
Time Frame: 1 year
Complications of EBUS-TBNA +IFB procedure compared to TBNA alone
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mardi Gomberg, MD, The George Washington University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary

Clinical Trials on Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Intranodal Forceps Biopsy

Subscribe