Disclosing Dementia Risk Based on Plasma Phosphorylated Tau

June 25, 2025 updated by: Corey Bolton, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Novel blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), such as plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181), have shown great promise in detecting early AD pathology. While current studies point to this biomarker as having great clinical utility, one necessary step before clinical implementation is developing safe and effective methods for disclosure of results. Past risk disclosure studies have shown that disclosing risk for AD based on genetics or amyloid status is safe, but these studies have largely focused on cognitively unimpaired individuals. This study seeks to develop comprehensible educational materials to aid risk disclosure and examine the effect of risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 results in a group of participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at imminent risk of converting to dementia. First, educational materials will be developed in collaboration with health communication experts and then refined in focus groups made up of individuals with MCI. Educational materials will be analyzed on several key reading and comprehensibility metrics and will include personalized risk estimate based on a well-accepted risk algorithm (Cullen, et al., 2021). Next, these educational materials will be utilized to disclose risk in a randomized controlled trial with an active control arm receiving disclosure based on age, sex, and cognitive status (based on Mini-Mental State Examination), meant to mimic common methods of clinical diagnostic and prognostic decision making, and an intervention arm receiving disclosure based on the above factors plus plasma p-tau181 results. Outcomes will include measures of comprehension and psychological well-being (anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and distress) and will be assessed immediately after risk disclosure and again at six-month follow-up. It is hypothesized that risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 is not more psychologically harmful or less comprehensible than disclosure based on demographic factors and MMSE. This pilot study will provide a necessary step towards moving plasma p-tau biomarkers towards safe clinical implementation and will develop educational materials that can be utilized in future studies and clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Novel blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), such as plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181), have shown great promise in sensitively and specifically detecting early AD pathology. Plasma p-tau181 has the potential to dramatically reduce the financial strain and patient care burden associated with identifying patients at increased risk of AD-dementia, as well as improve screening for enrollment in clinical trials which require the presence of AD-pathological changes. While current studies point to this biomarker as having great clinical utility, one necessary step before clinical implementation is developing safe and effective methods for disclosure of results. Past risk disclosure studies have shown that disclosing risk for AD based on genetics or amyloid status is safe, but these studies have largely focused on cognitively unimpaired individuals. This study seeks to develop comprehensible educational materials to aid risk disclosure and examine the effect of risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 results in a group of participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at imminent risk of converting to dementia. First, educational materials will be developed in collaboration with health communication experts and then refined in focus groups made up of individuals with MCI. Educational materials will be analyzed on several key reading and comprehensibility metrics and will include personalized risk estimate based on a well-accepted risk algorithm (Cullen, et al., 2021). Next, these educational materials will be utilized to disclose risk in a randomized controlled trial with an active control arm receiving disclosure based on age, sex, and cognitive status (based on Mini-Mental State Examination), meant to mimic common methods of clinical diagnostic and prognostic decision making, and an intervention arm receiving disclosure based on the above factors plus plasma p-tau181 results. Outcomes will include measures of comprehension and psychological well-being (anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and distress) and will be assessed immediately after risk disclosure and again at six-month follow-up. It is hypothesized that risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 is not more psychologically harmful or less comprehensible than disclosure based on demographic factors and MMSE. This pilot study will provide a necessary step towards moving plasma p-tau biomarkers towards safe clinical implementation and will develop educational materials that can be utilized in future studies and clinical practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Nashville, Illinois, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants recruited will include 62 adults aged 60 and older.
  2. Consensus diagnosis of amnestic MCI by Vanderbilt Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (VADRC) clinician panel.
  3. Availability of a reliable study partner (reliable is defined as someone who interacts significantly with the participant and is available to participate in study visits in person).
  4. English language fluency.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals who lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent at baseline will not be enrolled in the study.
  2. History of major psychiatric illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar), neurological illness (e.g., epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease), or head injury with significant loss of consciousness.
  3. Presence of acute psychological distress (i.e., Geriatric Depression Scale >10 at screening).
  4. Participation in other risk disclosure protocols.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Plasma p-tau Disclosure
To receive risk estimate based on plasma p-tau results in addition to age, sex, and cognitive screening score.
Participants will receive an estimated risk for converting to dementia in the next four years based on age, sex, MMSE score, and plasma p-tau results.
Active Comparator: Standard Disclosure
To receive risk estimate based on age, sex, and cognitive screening score.
Participants will receive an estimated risk for converting to dementia in the next four years based on age, sex, and MMSE score.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geriatric Depression Scale
Time Frame: Immediately following disclosure
Questionnaire assessing depression
Immediately following disclosure
Geriatric Depression Scale - 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: Immediately following disclosure and at 6-month follow-up
Questionnaire assessing depression
Immediately following disclosure and at 6-month follow-up
Geriatric Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Immediately following disclosure
Questionnaire assessing anxiety
Immediately following disclosure
Geriatric Anxiety Scale - 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: At 6-month follow-up
Questionnaire assessing anxiety
At 6-month follow-up
Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Immediately following disclosure
Questionnaire assessing hopelessness
Immediately following disclosure
Beck Hopelessness Scale - 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: At 6-month follow-up
Questionnaire assessing hopelessness
At 6-month follow-up
Impact of Events Scale
Time Frame: At 6-month follow-up
Questionnaire assessing event-related distress
At 6-month follow-up
Immediate Comprehension
Time Frame: Immediately following disclosure
Semi-structured interview to assess comprehension of disclosure information
Immediately following disclosure
Long-term Comprehension
Time Frame: At 6-month follow-up
Semi-structured interview to assess comprehension of disclosure information
At 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Corey J Bolton, PsyD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Plasma p-tau risk disclosure

Subscribe