- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04197856
Direct Information to At-risk Relatives (DIRECT)
Direct Letters to Relatives at Risk of Hereditary Cancer- a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of Healthcare-assisted Versus Family-mediated Risk Disclosure at Swedish Cancer Genetics Clinics (DIRECT-study)
This study evaluates if uptake of genetic counselling in high-risk families is increased when patients at cancer genetics clinics are being offered healthcare-assisted disclosure to at-risk relatives compared to current standard care (with family-mediated disclosure).
Patients/families who have undergone a cancer genetic investigation will be invited to participate in the study. All participants will receive standard care. Half of them will in addition be offered a healthcare-assisted disclosure with the service of direct letters to identified at-risk relatives distributed by the healthcare provider. After a year we will compare the proportion of at-risk relatives who have contacted a cancer genetic clinics in each study arm.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
(When the formal study protocol is published, this section will instead refer to the published study protocol).
This study is a multi-centre open label, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trial comparing an intervention of healthcare-assisted disclosure with standard care of family-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information in high-risk families in Sweden.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Patients/families will be enrolled and allocated in parallel to intervention or standard care.
All participants receive standard genetic counseling and information summarizing the results of their family investigation. They are informed about preventive measures when applicable, and are encouraged to inform their at-risk relatives (t=0 months).
The intervention component is the addition of a healthcare-assisted disclosure procedure. Participants in the intervention arm will be offered the service of sending letters directly to their at-risk relatives.
If the participant approves the offer, letters will be sent to eligible at-risk relatives deemed to be recommended genetic counseling within a year.
The direct letter will inform the at-risk relative that a cancer genetic investigation has been conducted in the family and the implications for him or her, and their blood relatives.
To facilitate access to further information, contact details to the closest cancer genetics unit are included in the letter. The letters are sent with registered mail in neutral envelopes which means that recipients will have to show proof of identity to retrieve the letter from their local delivery service provider.
METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDY OUTCOMES
For participants in both study arms, contact details of the at-risk relatives are identified in collaboration between health care provider and the participant. The health care provider records the name, approximate or exact year of birth and postal address of each at-risk relative for follow-up.
At the time of follow-up (t=12 months) the research nurse will check whether the relatives, listed one year before, have contacted a Swedish cancer genetic unit. Primary outcome data is retrieved from the patient data registries at each clinic. The research nurse will also record additional data points from CRFs, enabling analysis of the other pre-specified outcome measures in the intervention arm.
The outcome data are reported back to the national study secretariat as plain numbers without any personal details of the at-risk relatives.
SAMPLE SIZE AND STATISTICAL METHODS
For sample size calculation and statistical methods, see attached documents.
INTERNAL PILOT, AUDIT and PROGRESS CRITERIA
As this protocol has never been tested in Swedish clinical practice an internal pilot phase is included in the outline of the project.
Progress criteria at each study site are evaluated at internal pilot point and thereafter at formal audit at least yearly. Internal pilot point is set to the time when 20 individuals in total (across the 3 pilot study sites) have been included and treated according to protocol.
Continuation of the full-powered study at the specific study site will be determined by considering the criteria filled, the potentially necessary amendments, and the degree of which the amendments deviate from the original piloted study protocol.
The outcomes and process criteria are found in the attached document.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Umeå, Sweden, 90185
- Cancergenetisk mottagning
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria
- Patient being offered a cancer genetic investigation for hereditary breast, ovarian or colorectal cancer.
- Written consent to participate the study,
- Belonging to a family with; a) familial breast cancer, b) familial colorectal cancer, c) pathogenic variant in PALB2, BRCA1/2 (Hereditary breast cancer, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer), MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 (Lynch syndrome) and
- Having at least one eligible at-risk relative (family member deemed to be an ARR recommended genetic counseling within a year).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cannot convey personal opinions and preferences by themselves.
- No eligible at-risk relatives living in Sweden.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control / Family-mediated disclosure (standard care)
Genetic counseling according to current clinical practice
|
At counseling, eligible at-risk relatives (who may benefit from disclosure of risk information) are listed on a specified protocol in collaboration between health care provider and the participant.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention / Health-care assisted disclosure
Genetic counseling according to current clinical practice with the addition of an offer from health care provider to mail letters directly to eligible at-risk relatives.
|
At counseling, eligible at-risk relatives (who may benefit from disclosure of risk information) are listed on a specified protocol in collaboration between health care provider and the participant.
The participant is offered that the health care provider at the cancer genetic unit mail a direct letter with personalized family risk information to all at-risk relatives that participant approve contact with.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Uptake of genetic counselling among the patient's at-risk relatives
Time Frame: One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Number of potential at-risk relatives who have contacted a Swedish cancer genetic unit out of the total number of potential at-risk relatives for each patient.
|
One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention - Acceptance to offer (only intervention group)
Time Frame: One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Number of potential at-risk relatives that proband allowed contact with, compared to total number of potential at-risk relatives for that specific patient.
[proportion]
|
One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
|
Intervention - Distribution of letters (only intervention group)
Time Frame: One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Number of at-risk relatives that proband allowed contact with and where contact data allowed distribution of direct letter, compared to total number of potential at-risk relatives for that specific patient.
[proportion]
|
One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
|
Intervention - Collection of letters (only intervention group)
Time Frame: One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Number of at-risk relatives that proband allowed contact with, contact data was sufficient and the registered letter was collected from the post-office within 12 months, compared to total number of potential at-risk relatives for that specific patient.
[proportion]
|
One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
|
Proportion of first-degree ARRs contacting a cancer genetics clinic
Time Frame: One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Comparing intervention and control group with respect to proportion of first-degree ARRs who have contacted a Swedish cancer genetics clinic within 12 months of the proband receiving post-test genetic counselling because the proband is a carrier of a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2.
|
One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
|
Proportion of distant ARRs contacting a cancer genetics clinic
Time Frame: One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Comparing intervention and control group with respect to proportion of second-degree, third-degree or more distant ARRs who have contacted a Swedish cancer genetics clinic within 12 months of the proband receiving post-test genetic counselling because the proband is a carrier of a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2.
|
One year (12 months) following the first counselling session when implications of the cancer genetic investigation for the patient´s at-risk relatives is discussed, hence 12 months after t=0.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Metabolic Diseases
- Skin Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Genital Neoplasms, Female
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Disease
- Ovarian Diseases
- Adnexal Diseases
- Gonadal Disorders
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
- Breast Diseases
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Colonic Diseases
- Intestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Neoplasms
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary
- DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders
- Ovarian Neoplasms
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Syndrome
- Breast Neoplasms
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
- The Swedish DIRECT study
- 2018-00964 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Swedish Research council for health, worklife and welfare)
- 2020-1107 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Swedish Cancer Society)
- 2022-02226 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Swedish research council)
- 86719 (Registry Identifier: RCC Cancerstudier i Sverige (in Swedish))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lynch Syndrome
-
San Raffaele UniversityRecruitingColorectal Cancer | Lynch Syndrome | Colo-rectal Cancer | Colon Adenoma | Colon Disease | MLH1 Gene Mutation | Adenoma Colon | Colon Neoplasm | Mismatch Repair Deficiency | Lynch Syndrome I (Site-specific Colonic Cancer) | MSH2 Gene Mutation | MSH6 Gene Mutation | PMS2 Gene Mutation | EPCAM Gene Mutation | Lynch Syndrome... and other conditionsItaly
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedHigh-Frequency Microsatellite Instability | Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation | Mutation-Negative Lynch Syndrome | Mutation-Positive Lynch SyndromeUnited States
-
San Raffaele UniversityHumanitas Hospital, Italy; Unita' di Gastroenterologia - Policlinico Universitario... and other collaboratorsRecruitingLynch Syndrome | MLH1 Gene Mutation | MSH2 Gene Mutation | MSH6 Gene Mutation | PMS2 Gene Mutation | Lynch Syndrome II | Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma | Lynch Syndrome IItaly
-
San Raffaele UniversityRecruitingLynch Syndrome | HNPCC | MLH1 Gene Mutation | Hereditary Cancer | Lynch Syndrome I (Site-specific Colonic Cancer) | MSH2 Gene Mutation | MSH6 Gene Mutation | PMS2 Gene Mutation | Lynch Syndrome II | Hereditary Cancer Syndrome | Lynch Syndrome I | HNPCC Gene Mutation | MLH1 Gene Deletion+Duplication | MLH1 Loss of... and other conditionsUnited States, Italy
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterRambam Health Care Campus; Rabin Medical Center; Sheba Medical Center; Soroka University...Not yet recruitingLynch Syndrome I (Site-specific Colonic Cancer)Israel
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesNot yet recruitingLynch Syndrome | Epidermoid Carcinoma | Muir-Torre Syndrome | Basal Cell Carcinoma of Skin, Site Unspecified
-
UNICANCERNot yet recruitingLynch SyndromeNorway, Latvia, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Czechia, Croatia, Finland, France, Italy
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingLynch Syndrome | Hereditary Neoplastic Syndrome | BRCA1-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome | BRCA2-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverJohns Hopkins University; University of Manitoba; University of Pennsylvania; University... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterEnrolling by invitationLynch Syndrome | Hereditary Cancer Syndromes | BRCA1 Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Standard care encouraging family-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedRenal TransplantationUnited States, Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium, Australia, Hungary, Netherlands, Sweden, Colombia, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Korea, Republic of, Portugal