Acceptability and Feasibility of MOL in Acute Inpatient Units

May 12, 2023 updated by: Lydia Carr, University of Manchester

Is Method of Levels (MOL) Therapy an Acceptable and Feasible Psychological Intervention for People in Acute Mental Health Inpatient Services: A Case Series.

The current study aims to test the acceptability and feasibility of a psychological therapy called Method of Levels (MOL) as an intervention for people in acute psychiatric inpatient units who are experiencing psychosis and/or suicidality.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • GMMH Park House
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • GMMH: Laureate House

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over the age of 18 years
  • Current service user in an acute inpatient ward in the Greater Manchester area
  • Capacity to provide informed consent for participating in research
  • Good command of English language
  • WS1: Experiencing psychosis (this will be screened for using a clinical cut-off score on the CAPE (Mossaheb et al., 2012))
  • WS2: Experiencing suicidality (this will be screened for using a cynical cut-off score on the Suicidal Behaviours Questionnaire - revised (SBQ-R) (Osman et al., 2001))

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Problems of an organic nature or a learning disability that might affect cognitive functioning

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MOL therapy
Participants with Psychosis and/or Suicidality receiving MOL therapy
MOL therapy aims to help people develop awareness of their personal goals so they can identify incompatibilities and find potential solutions. In MOL, the therapist uses a specific style to help people focus attention on the problem at hand, long enough to consider the issues from different perspectives, including reflection on the associated emotions. This process is usually very experiential and requires the client to be actively engaged in controlling the focus of the session and decision making.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of approved patients recruited
Time Frame: Study consent meeting, approx. 1 week after initial meeting
We will deem the study feasible if at least 72% of approached people consent to participate
Study consent meeting, approx. 1 week after initial meeting
Proportion of recruited patients retained
Time Frame: End of therapy interview
We will deem the study feasible if least 62% of recruited participants are retained (i.e. receive at least one therapy session and complete the end of therapy measures and interview)
End of therapy interview
Number of participants who receiving the intervention
Time Frame: End of first therapy session, approx. 2 weeks after initial meeting
We will deem the study feasible if 10 participants receive at least one therapy session
End of first therapy session, approx. 2 weeks after initial meeting
Acceptability (qualitative)
Time Frame: End of therapy interview
Qualitative interview with participant at end of therapy analysed using Thematic Analysis
End of therapy interview
Results of Novel Client Measure (descriptive)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Qualitative self-reported perception of what was helpful about the therapeutic environment
End of therapy research meeting
Results of Outcome Rating Scale (descriptive)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Qualitative self-report measure assessing areas of life functioning known to change as a result of therapeutic intervention
End of therapy research meeting
Feasibility of adaptions required
Time Frame: Final follow up meeting with final participant, 3 months after consent
Qualitative record of adaptions required for use of MOL in an acute inpatient setting
Final follow up meeting with final participant, 3 months after consent

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological Outcomes Profile (descriptive)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Outcome measure assessing idiosyncratic problems and distress
End of therapy research meeting
Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-OM (descriptive)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Outcome measure assessing idiosyncratic problems and distress
End of therapy research meeting
Reorganisation of Conflict Scale (descriptive)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Outcome measure assessing goal conflict reorganisation (a key mechanism of change in MOL)
End of therapy research meeting
Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (if experiencing psychosis at point of consent)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Outcome measure assessing experiences of psychosis
End of therapy research meeting
Linehan Reasons for Living Inventory (if experiencing suicidality at point of consent)
Time Frame: End of therapy research meeting
Outcome measure assessing experiences of suicidality
End of therapy research meeting

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara Tai, DClinPsy, University of Manchester
  • Principal Investigator: Yvonne Awenat, PhD, University of Manchester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 305321

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychosis

Clinical Trials on Method of Levels therapy

Subscribe