Optimizing a Bio-behavioral Intervention for Sustained Viral Suppression

August 28, 2024 updated by: University of Texas, El Paso

Optimizing a Bio-behavioral Intervention to Promote Viral Suppression Among HIV+ People Who Inject Drugs on the U.S.-Mexico Border

The study will test two behavioral intervention components to identify the combination of the two components that best supports people who inject drugs to achieve and sustain HIV viral load suppression.

The study design is a 2-to-the-2 factorial experiment. The 2 represents the level of each component: 0 (receive) or 1 (don't receive). The 2 represents the number of components being tested. The four components are: 1) receiving (or not receiving) peer support services for medication-assisted treatment (MAT) uptake and persistence and 2) behavioral activation therapy for depression (BAT). Therefore, in order to test which combination of components produce the best outcome, this factorial design randomizes people to 1 of 4 conditions. Each condition represents a possible combination of the 2 components above. All participants will receive patient navigation for care engagement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of 4 experimental conditions. Each condition will represents every possible combination of 2 components (e.g., 1 only, 2 only, 1-2, none). Participants complete a survey assessment at baseline, complete their assigned intervention components, and then return to complete follow-up assessment surveys at 3-, 6-,9-, and 12-months. The primary outcome is sustained viral suppression defined as viral load test results of <400 copies per mL on all 6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Results of Aim 1 will yield estimates of the unique impact of each intervention component, as well as each combination of components, on sustained viral suppression. The research team and partners will make decisions about what constitutes the optimized intervention by judging the observed effect sizes and statistical significance against real-world constraints that go into the delivery of the interventions. The secondary aims are to test mediators to explain component 1-2 and its relationship to viral suppression. We will also test moderators of these relationship between each component and outcome of viral suppression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Chihuahua
      • Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico, 32330
        • Recruiting
        • Programa Compañeros
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be at least 18 years of age
  • be able to provide informed consent
  • be eligible to receive free HIV care services in Mexico
  • be HIV positive
  • have injected drugs in the last 30 days
  • not be on methadone replacement therapy
  • be willing to discuss MAT uptake with a peer
  • sign a medical release form to have medical data abstracted
  • agree to submit and describe locator information
  • agree to return to follow-up visits
  • able to communicate in Spanish
  • screen positive for depression on the PHQ-2
  • have no plans of moving outside the study area in the next 12-months
  • meet one of the following:

    1. not currently in possession of ART or not taking ART but prescribed ART or
    2. sub-optimal ART adherence as at least one 4-day treatment interruption in the past 90 days or
    3. sub-optimal retention in HIV care - never engaged or disengaged from HIV care as 2 or more missed clinic appointments in the last 9 months or
    4. no viral load test done in the past six months or
    5. self-reports a detectable viral load within the past 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • has not injected drugs in the last 30 days or do not have a verifiable opioid use disorder
  • is not HIV positive
  • is receiving methadone
  • is unwilling to discuss methadone uptake with a peer
  • does not screen positive for depression
  • is not able to provide informed consent
  • does not speak Spanish
  • has plans to move out of the city
  • does not qualify to receive free HIV care services in Mexico
  • has an appearance of psychological disturbance or severe cognitive impairment that could limit understanding of study procedures as determined by study staff

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Condition 1: Component 1
1) Peer-Support for Medication-Assisted Treatment
Participants will be assigned to receive peer support to promote uptake of MAT and persistence. This component will consist of two informational sessions, a tailored recovery plan, and on-going support from a peer for the first 6 months.
Experimental: Condition 2: Component 2
2) Behavioral Activation Therapy
Participants will be assigned to receive BAT treatment for depression. This component will consist of 8 sessions where participants will identify short and long-term goals, values, and the activities unrelated to substance use that were previously enjoyed or are likely to increase a feeling of well-being. This intervention component focuses on making a plan to troubleshoot barriers to re-engage in these activities. Sessions are delivered weekly. The content includes psycho-education about what depression is, the intervention rationale, and the activities and monitoring of activities, building social contracts to engage networks, and discussion of potential barriers to following through with activities.
Experimental: Condition 3: Components 1 and 2

Participants assigned to a combination of:

  1. Peer-Support for Medication-Assisted Treatment
  2. Behavioral Activation Therap
Participants will be assigned to receive peer support to promote uptake of MAT and persistence. This component will consist of two informational sessions, a tailored recovery plan, and on-going support from a peer for the first 6 months.
Participants will be assigned to receive BAT treatment for depression. This component will consist of 8 sessions where participants will identify short and long-term goals, values, and the activities unrelated to substance use that were previously enjoyed or are likely to increase a feeling of well-being. This intervention component focuses on making a plan to troubleshoot barriers to re-engage in these activities. Sessions are delivered weekly. The content includes psycho-education about what depression is, the intervention rationale, and the activities and monitoring of activities, building social contracts to engage networks, and discussion of potential barriers to following through with activities.
Experimental: Condition 4: No Components
Participants not assigned to any of the 2 components. They are placed on a wait list and will receive components after the primary data collection period.
Participants not assigned to components 1 and 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement of Viral Suppression
Time Frame: Viral load below or above 400 copiers per mL at the 6-month follow-up assessment
Viral suppression is defined as a laboratory test result showing HIV viral load as less than 400 copies per mL. To meet our definition of achieved viral suppression, viral load must be below 400 copiers per mL at 6-month follow-up.
Viral load below or above 400 copiers per mL at the 6-month follow-up assessment
Viral Suppression at 9-month follow-up
Time Frame: Viral load below or above 400 copiers per mL at the 9-month follow-up assessment
Viral suppression is defined as a laboratory test result showing HIV viral load as less than 400 copies per mL. To meet our definition of viral suppression, viral load must be below 400 copiers per mL at 6-month follow-up.
Viral load below or above 400 copiers per mL at the 9-month follow-up assessment
Viral Suppression at 12-month follow-up
Time Frame: Viral load below or above 400 copiers per mL at the 12-month follow-up assessment
Viral suppression is defined as a laboratory test result showing HIV viral load as less than 400 copies per mL. To meet our definition of viral suppression, viral load must be below 400 copiers per mL.
Viral load below or above 400 copiers per mL at the 12-month follow-up assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drug use
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Will be measured through urine analysis and participants will self-report the frequency (yes vs no), quantity (how much typically consumed when using), and duration of use (how may days in the last 30 days did the participant use and how many times did the participant use yesterday) of various drugs in last 30 days.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Methadone uptake and persistence
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Information about date of first dose, current dosage, and number of days on Methadone will be extracted from the medical record.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Drug use frequency and severity of withdrawal and cravings
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Opioid Withdrawal Scale - This is a clinician administered scale that assesses the extent opiate withdrawal symptoms based on 11 symptoms (resting pulse rate, sweating, restlessness, pupil size, bone or joint aches, runny nose, GI upset, tremors, yawning, anxiety or irritability, gooseflesh skin.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Depressive Symptoms (Clinician-assisted rating)
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale will be used, which is a 10-item scale and is clinician-assisted. interview participants and clinicians will rate their level of depression. Symptoms assessed include: apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Depressive Symptoms (Self-report)
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
The validated nine-item patient health questionnaire will be administered to participants to measure their level of depression. Participants will be asked to rate how many days of the last 2 weeks they have been bothered by having little interest or pleasure doing things, feeling down, feeling tired, having poor appetite, feeling bad about themselves, having trouble concentrating, moving or speaking slowly, and having thought of hurting themselves.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Behavioral activation for depression
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
The validated 25 item questionnaire will be administered to participants to assess changes in the behaviors in the past week that underlie their depression such as staying in bed too long, inability to do things that needed to be done, and being active and accomplishing goals.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Adherence to antiretroviral medication (ART)
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Percent adherent to ART measure will be extracted from medical records
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Non-adherence to antiretroviral medication (ART)
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Non-adherence will be measured as 4-day treatment interruptions (yes vs no) extracted from medical records.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Information, motivation, and behavioral skills to adhere to ART
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Participants will answer the validated 30-item scale to assess psychological precursors of adherence including information (e.g., knowledge of how current HIV medications should be taken); Motivation (e.g., support from close significant others to take HIV medication); Behavioral skills (e.g, how easy it is to get HIV medications refills on time)
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Self-efficacy to adhere to ART
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Participants will answer the validate 12-items scale assessing perceived self-efficacy to adhere to antiretroviral medication in the last 30 days. The scale asks about the level of confidence the participant has in keeping up with the treatment plan in spite of difficulties such as sided-effects and amid change in sleep and dietary habits and ability to integrate taking medications into the daily routine
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Retention in HIV care
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Retention will be assessed by extracting from the medical record: appointments missed and appointments kept. A ratio will be computed using these two measures. At least one appointment kept in each three-month period will be an index of appointment constancy.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Logistical barriers to HIV care
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Participants will be asked to indicate whether they have experienced common barriers to HIV care (yes/no) including availability of transportation, being able to access care, clinic hours of operation.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Perceived engagement in HIV care
Time Frame: 3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments
Participants will answer the 10-item validated scale assessing perceived engagement in HIV care including level of trust in provider, feeling respected and understood by provider, degree of comfort in asking questions and interacting with provider, participant's perceived role in his medical care,.
3-,6-,9-, and 12-month follow-up assessments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia Lechuga, The University of Texas at El Paso
  • Principal Investigator: John A Sauceda, The University of California San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will share a final modified quantitative dataset with the corresponding code book to validate all findings. The dataset will be modified to remove any potential identifiable information (such as date of birth).

Interested parties will be asked to sign an agreement with MPIs Lechuga and Sauceda that specifies that the use of the data is for research purposes only. Furthermore, in order to have the data shared, each party must have: a) adequate systems in place to secure, encrypt and protect the data file to prevent the disclosure of identities, and b) a plan for destruction or returning the data files after all analyses have been completed. Prior to the sharing of data, approval from the requester's Institutional Review Board is required.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be made available as soon as possible but no later than within one year of the completion of the funded project period or upon acceptance of the data for publication, whichever is earlier.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Directions for requesting the dataset will be available at the official study website, which is to be developed. This information will be found in all publications and conference abstract presentations. An individual participant data statement noting steps to access the data is to be developed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Viremia

Clinical Trials on Peer support to promote uptake and persistence of medication assisted treatment (MAT)

Subscribe