The Akershus Study of Ischemic Stroke and Thrombolysis -1 (ASIST-1)

February 3, 2025 updated by: Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, University Hospital, Akershus

The Akershus Study of Ischemic Stroke and Thrombolysis -1 (ASIST-1) Epidemiology, Clinical and Radiological Presentation and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke Mimics in a Norwegian Population

This observational study comprises consecutively patients with cerebrovascular diseases admitted to the Stroke Unit at Akershus University Hospital in Norway. Akershus University Hospital is the largest emergency care hospital in Norway and has a catchment area covering a population of 550.000, which is approximately 10 % of the Norwegian population and reasonably representative according to data from Statistics Norway. The hospital is public and serving both as a primary hospital and a university hospital. Due to the Norwegian, national, all-covering health-insurance, all patients enter the hospital and are considered for further in-patient care on the same conditions. The hospital has a stroke unit classified as a comprehensive stroke center according to European Stroke Organisation standards. Acute stroke management follows national and international guidelines. Overall, the ASIST-1 study will investigate management, outcome and prognosis of stroke and stroke care pathways and later follow up in primary care using several approaches combining existing clinical data from a representative population with different Norwegian health registries. Parts of the study are retrospective with prospective follow-up by health registries and parts of the study are prospective.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aims

i) to describe the use of the stroke fast track and the proportion of all those evaluated in the fast track actually treated with intravenous thrombolysis, ii) to identify reasons for not giving thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke symptoms < 4.5 hours at admission to hospital, iii) to investigate whether or not some of these patients that did not receive thrombolysis actually could have been given thrombolysis, iv) to investigate the outcome of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy), v) to investigate differences between stroke and stroke mimics for patients reaching the hospital within or outside the thrombolysis time window of 4.5 hours, vi) to investigate differences between stroke subtypes (both ischemic and hemorrhagic) and stroke mimics for patients reaching the hospital within or outside the thrombolysis time window of 4.5 hours, vii) to investigate outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke mimics, viii) to investigate predictors and factors related to functional outcome for patients with acute ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, TIA or stroke mimics, ix) to describe the epidemiology of large vessel occlusions in a representative hospital population, x) to describe hemorrhagic stroke in a representative hospital population, xi) whether risk factors, acute blood pressure variability or imaging (CT, angiography, perfusion or MRI) may predict diagnosis or outcome at discharge, 3 months, 12 months and 2 years for the ASIST-1 population, xii) whether risk factors, acute blood pressure variability or imaging (CT, angiography, perfusion or MRI) may predict outcome at discharge, 3 months, 12 months and 2 years for different sub-types of stroke, xiii) to investigate readmission until 5 years after initial admission for acute stroke symptoms xiv) whether deep learning-based assessment of acute phase CT, CT perfusion and CT angiography can reliably identify infarct core, penumbra and large-vessel occlusion, estimate reliably collateral score, predict risk of adverse events, or guide target blood pressure during acute and subacute ischemic stroke specialized treatment, xv) whether deep learning-based assessment of acute phase CT, CT perfusion and CT angiography or MRI can predict clinical outcome in different types of stroke, xvi) whether deep learning-based assessment of acute phase CT, CT perfusion, CT angiography or MRI can be used for automatic detection of hematoma volume and localization in hemorrhagic stroke xvii) whether deep learning-based assessment of acute phase CT or MRI can predict risk of new incidents after a hemorrhagic stroke and thus guide the clinicians to whether or not patients should be started/re-started on anti-platelet therapy or anticoagulation xviii) to investigate secondary prevention after different subtypes of stroke and the adherence of statins, anti-platelet therapy, anti-coagulation and blood pressure treatment up to 5 years after stroke, also in relation to readmission rates and long-term mortality xix) to prospectively investigate quality in terms of treatment, complications, prognosis and predictive factors of all patients given thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy at Ahus 2019-2025 xx) to investigate the changes in prehospital delay, the use of stroke fast track, stroke pathways and treatment over time (2012-2025).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

6000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. IVT treated patients 2012-2025 (2012-2018 retrospective, 2019-2025 prospective)
  2. All patients with ICH (2011-2019 retrospective, 2020-2025 prospective)
  3. All patients with acute ischemic stroke or ICH (2015-2018 retrospective, 2019-2025 prospective)
  4. All patients admitted to the stroke care pathway (stroke/mimics 2015-2017)
  5. All stroke patients treated with endovascular treatment 2012-2025 (2012-2018 retrospective, 2019-2025 prospective)
  6. All patients with cerebellar hematoma 2008-2022 (retrospective)

Data will be linked with data from general practitioners, Municipal Patient Registry (KRP/KUHR), Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), Norwegian Stroke registry, Cause of Death Registry (DÅR)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebrovascular diseases (acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, transient ischemic attack) or stroke mimics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)
All patients treated with IVT in the acute stroke care pathway 2012-2025
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)
All patients with intracerebral hemorrhage 2012-2019
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)
All patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage 2015-2017
Stoke care pathway
All patients admitted to the stroke care pathway (ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, transient ischemic attack and stroke mimics) 2015-2017
Endovascular treatment
All stroke patients treated with endovascular treatment 2012-2025
Cerebellar hematoma (cICH)
All patients with cerebellar hematoma 2008-2019

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Large vessel occlusion in a representative Norwegian population
Time Frame: Baseline 2015-2017
Incidence of large vessel occlusion 2015-2017
Baseline 2015-2017
Functional status
Time Frame: 3 months
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-6 (0 normal, 6 dead) for all groups
3 months
Functional status
Time Frame: Index discharge from hospital, usually up to 1 month
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-6 (0 normal, 6 dead) for all groups
Index discharge from hospital, usually up to 1 month
Mortality
Time Frame: In-hospital, usually up to 1 month
Number dead vs total number of cases all groups
In-hospital, usually up to 1 month
Mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
Number dead vs total number of cases all groups
3 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
Number dead vs total number of cases all groups
12 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
Number dead vs total number of cases all groups
24 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
Number dead vs total number of cases all groups
5 years
Diagnostic precision of different published clinical screening scales of stroke and large vessel occlusion
Time Frame: Baseline 2015-2017
Diagnostic precision, accuracy and validity of clinical screening scales
Baseline 2015-2017

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reasons for not giving thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke symptoms < 4.5 hours
Time Frame: Baseline 2015-2017
Number of cases treated with thrombolysis vs number of cases evaluated in the acute stroke care pathway
Baseline 2015-2017
Functional outcome of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy),
Time Frame: 3 months
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-6 (0 normal, 6 dead)
3 months
Mortality of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy),
Time Frame: 3 months
Mortality
3 months
Functional outcome after 1 year of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy),
Time Frame: 1 year
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-6 (0 normal, 6 dead)
1 year
Mortality after 1 year of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy),
Time Frame: 1 year
Mortality
1 year
Functional outcome at discharge of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy),
Time Frame: Discharge after index admission, usually up to 1 month
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-6 (0 normal, 6 dead)
Discharge after index admission, usually up to 1 month
Mortality at discharge of patients in the stroke fast track treated or not treated with thrombolysis (or endovascular thrombectomy),
Time Frame: Discharge after index admission, usually up to 1 month
Mortality
Discharge after index admission, usually up to 1 month
Re-admission
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of new re-admission among included patients
Baseline to five years
New prescriptions
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Type of new prescriptions
Baseline to five years
Use of anti-coagulation in the long-term
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of patients treated with anti-coagulation
Baseline to five years
Use of anti-platelet therapy in the long-term
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of patients treated with anti-platelet therapy
Baseline to five years
Use of cholesterol-lowering drugs in the long-term
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of patients treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs
Baseline to five years
Use of anti-hypertensive drugs in the long-term
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of patients treated with anti-hypertensive drugs
Baseline to five years
Use of anti-diabetics in the long-term
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of patients treated with anti-diabetics
Baseline to five years
Health care utilisation
Time Frame: Baseline to five years
Number of new health care system contacts
Baseline to five years
Prehospital delay
Time Frame: 2012-2025
Changes in prehospital delay (minutes)
2012-2025
Time of stroke fast track
Time Frame: 2012-2025
Changes in the use of stroke fast track (minutes)
2012-2025
Use of stroke fast track
Time Frame: 2012-2025
Changes in the use of stroke pathways (proportion)
2012-2025
Treated in the stroke fast track
Time Frame: 2012-2025
Changes in proportion treated over time
2012-2025
Blood pressure variability baseline (diastolic, systolic and pulse pressure)
Time Frame: Baseline
Different BP measurements from general practitioners, ambulance, hospital and follow-up
Baseline
Blood pressure variability discharge after index (diastolic, systolic and pulse pressure)
Time Frame: Discharge after index admission, usually up to 1 month
Different BP measurements from general practitioners, ambulance, hospital and follow-up
Discharge after index admission, usually up to 1 month
Blood pressure variability follow-up (diastolic, systolic and pulse pressure)
Time Frame: Follow-up (3 to 6 months)
Different BP measurements from general practitioners, ambulance, hospital and follow-up
Follow-up (3 to 6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Espen S. Kristoffersen, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Akershus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2040

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Could be possible, but must be approved by Medical Ethics Committee in Norway

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Ischemic

Subscribe