Increasing Documentation and Disclosure of Sickle Cell Trait Status: An Implementation Science Approach

January 5, 2026 updated by: Corinna Schultz, Nemours Children's Clinic
The hemoglobinopathy newborn screen (NBS) performed on all neonates in the U.S. allows for early life-saving medical care for infants with sickle cell disease (SCD), an autosomal recessive genetic disorder. Because of its detection method, the NBS incidentally reveals hemoglobinopathy traits including sickle cell trait (SCT). In an effort to uphold the rights of the newborn to their medical data and preserve autonomy in medical decision making, pediatric and genetic society guidelines recommend disclosure and documentation of SCT results during infancy. Despite this guidance, a large guideline-to-practice gap exists: SCT status is grossly under-documented in the pediatric electronic health record and few adults report knowing their SCT status despite universal screening. We plan to evaluate the effect of a toolkit of SCT Documentation and Disclosure (SCT-DD) strategies on documentation and disclosure of SCT by pediatric primary care providers in a 2-arm randomized interrupted time series trial.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19803
        • Nemours Children's Hospital, Delware

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatient pediatric primary care providers within Nemours and their patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: "All-in"
In the "all-in" arm, pediatric primary care physicians receive all toolkit components at once.
A toolkit of implementation strategies
Active Comparator: "Add-in"
In the "add-in" arm, pediatric primary care physicians will have sequential addition of toolkit components in 6 week increments
A toolkit of implementation strategies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: At conclusion of study: 18 weeks after initial roll-out of interventions
Acceptability of toolkit components by pediatric primary care providers by survey at the end of the study (i.e. 18 weeks after initial roll-out of interventions). Reported as the number who answered Agree or Strongly Agree on a 4-point Likert scale that they liked the toolkit component. Likert scale options included strong disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree.
At conclusion of study: 18 weeks after initial roll-out of interventions
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: At conclusion of study (18 weeks after initial roll-out of interventions)
Confidence to document/discuss SCT result by pediatric primary care providers by survey. Scale 1 to 10: 1 = not confident at all, 10 = extremely confident.
At conclusion of study (18 weeks after initial roll-out of interventions)
Feasibility of Using Toolkit Components
Time Frame: Survey at end of study: 18 weeks after roll-out of interventions
Number of pediatric primary care providers who used individual toolkit components in the last 6 weeks of the study (week 12-18) as indicated by answering "yes" to questions about whether individual toolkit components were used on a survey at the end of the study (18 weeks after roll-out of interventions).
Survey at end of study: 18 weeks after roll-out of interventions
Penetration
Time Frame: Chart review for retrospective patients was done before intervention roll-out. Chart review for prospective patients was done on a rolling basis at 2 months of age for any newborn patient seen during the 18 week intervention period
The number of newborns with newborn screen results visible in the electronic healthcare record and presence of documentation of abnormal newborn screen results. By chart review.
Chart review for retrospective patients was done before intervention roll-out. Chart review for prospective patients was done on a rolling basis at 2 months of age for any newborn patient seen during the 18 week intervention period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge
Time Frame: Survey for retrospective patients was sent before intervention roll-out. Survey for prospective patients were sent on a rolling basis at 2 months of age for any newborn patient seen during the 18 week intervention period.
Knowledge of newborn screen results by caregivers via survey.
Survey for retrospective patients was sent before intervention roll-out. Survey for prospective patients were sent on a rolling basis at 2 months of age for any newborn patient seen during the 18 week intervention period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Corinna Schultz, MD, MSHP, Nemours

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Trait

Clinical Trials on SCT Documentation and Disclosure Toolkit (SCT-DD)

Subscribe