Decision Aid (DA) for Renal Patients

November 28, 2025 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Evaluation of a Decision Aid in the Treatment Planning of Small Renal Tumors

The objective of this study is to understand how patients make decisions about treating their kidney masses, and to identify key values and preferences for treating their kidney masses. The study team will develop a decision aid (DA) using the decision-analytic model to communicate personalized benefit/harm estimates to patients and promote patient-centered treatment of renal tumors.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female post-op and pre-op patients, ages 18 and older, diagnosed with a localized renal tumor up to 4 cm in diameter.
  • Patients scheduled for standard-of-care clinical exams with the NYU Urology Department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage IV cancer of any type
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Vulnerable subjects will not be recruited

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decision Aid (DA) Web Tool
The DA web tool provides information on kidney masses and available treatment options. It uses risk communication, directed teaching, and interactive benefit-harm assessment to present information.
Active Comparator: Institutional Pamphlet
The institutional pamphlet provides information on kidney masses, but does not use risk communication, directed teaching, or interactive benefit-harm assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge Score
Time Frame: Pre-Counsel, 1 day Visit
Via a survey, patients will be asked general questions about kidney masses and their treatments. There are 10 questions, each scored as correct or incorrect (0 or 1), and the last question has 3 sub-components each scored 0-1. The total range of score is 0-10; a score of 10 indicates strongest knowledge on kidney masses/treatments.
Pre-Counsel, 1 day Visit
Decision Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Post-Counsel, 1 day Visit
Via a survey, patients provide their opinion on 16 statements. Each statement is scored 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total range of score is 1-80; a higher score indicates higher satisfaction.
Post-Counsel, 1 day Visit
Shared Decision Making
Time Frame: Post-Counsel, 1 day Visit
This is a binary outcome measure. Patients will be asked whether or not they felt they participated in a shared decision making process: 0 for no, 1 for yes.
Post-Counsel, 1 day Visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stella Kang, MD, NYU Langone Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to stella.kang@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Decision Aid (DA) Web Tool

Subscribe