Feasibility of a Digital Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Clinicians and Families of Patients With SABI

April 17, 2024 updated by: Susanne Muehlschlegel, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Pilot Trial of a Web/Mobile/Tablet-based Communication and Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Clinicians and Families of Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients

The goal is to pilot test a highly accessible, web-based, pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome ongoing problems with high stakes decision-making by surrogate decision-makers of patients in ICUs with severe acute brain injury (SABI), including those with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, large hemispheric acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Every 30 seconds an adult in the U.S. suffers a severe acute brain injury (SABI) from traumatic brain injury or large ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, resulting in 200,000 deaths and >900,000 survivors living with disability annually. Every day, surrogate decision-makers face the difficult "goals of care" decision in intensive care units (ICUs) to continue or withdraw life support while considering the patient's long-term prognosis. In this study, we will pilot test a pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome ongoing problems with high stakes decision-making by surrogates of patients with SABI in ICUs. These problems are an important target for intervention, because they contribute to 3 major clinical and public health issues: 1) family members struggle in the role of surrogate, leading to lasting symptoms of psychological distress; 2) clinicians are poorly trained in communicating prognosis after SABI, often doing so with variability and bias, inadequately preparing families for their decisions; 3) patients often receive burdensome treatments that they would not choose.

Decision aids improve the quality of patients' decisions based on a large evidence-base, but no empirically validated tools currently exist for surrogate decision-making in SABI patients at high risk for death or disability. This is problematic because surrogates of SABI patients are unprepared for the difficult decisions about the use of life support and patients' potential long-term disability, which hinge on both medical information and the patient's values and preferences. We have developed and refined a tailored digital, web-based decision aid (DA) for families of critically ill SABI patients, conceptually grounded in the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, to enhance, not replace, clinician-family communication. We will leverage a digital platform, which is portable and shareable among family members when geographically distant or not allowed to visit the ICU (as during the COVID-19 pandemic) and allows integration of videos to reach lower-literacy groups. This innovative tool challenges the existing paradigm for decision-making in SABI patients.

This pilot study among 50 surrogates of SABI patients and their clinicians will assess the feasibility of deploying the web-based tool as well as to explore the tools impact on measures of communication and decision-quality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH
  • Phone Number: (410)502-6534
  • Email: smuehlsch@jhu.edu

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria for surrogates and patients:

  • surrogate is age 18 years or older, no upper age limit;
  • documented surrogate decision-maker (official health care proxy, or legal next of kin) of a critically ill severe acute brain injury (SABI) patient ≥ 3 days after admission;
  • patient is age 18 years or older, no upper age limit;
  • patient has SABI; defined as either traumatic brain injury, spontaneous primary intracerebral hemorrhage (not due to tumor or vascular malformation), or hemispheric acute ischemic stroke;
  • patient is"critically ill" defined as either intubated on a mechanical ventilator, or unable to swallow without a feeding tube (even if not intubated/ventilated);
  • patient is judged by the attending physician to have ≥40% risk of death or long-term functional impairment, elicited by asking the attending physician, "does this patient have at least a 40% chance of in-hospital mortality or long-term functional impairment?", defined as needing assistance with at least 1 activity of daily living (ADL).
  • patient has undergone initial stabilization but remains critically ill;
  • surrogate will participate in clinician-family goals of care meeting, either in person or via video- or telephone-conference.
  • surrogate must be English speaking and literate

Exclusion Criteria for surrogates and patients:

  • devastating patients with severe SABI who die early (within the first 3 days after admission);
  • surrogate decision-maker is non-English speaking;
  • surrogate decision-maker is illiterate.

Inclusion criteria for clinicians:

  • clinical treating attending, or physician trainee (fellow, resident), or licensed affiliated practitioner who will lead the clinician-family meeting when goals-of-care are discussed;
  • clinician may decline participation in the outcome measures but cannot restrict the surrogate decision-maker in study participation.

Exclusion criteria for clinicians:

- unwillingness to comply with study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Web-based Decision Aid + Communication (DA+C) tool
Surrogate(s) will read/click through the DA+C tool prior to the clinician-family meeting and complete the integrated worksheet. Surrogate(s) will have unlimited access to the DA+C tool and may return to the tool and edit the worksheet at any time.
The web/mobile/tablet-based digital DA+C toll is designed to enhance communication and shared decision making between clinicians and surrogates of critically ill severe acute brain injury (SABI) with four goals: to 1) prepare families for their surrogate role and discussions with clinicians; 2) provide balanced information to families on prognosis and all available treatment options; 3) provide tailored information about the patient and family to clinicians in advance of family meetings; and 4) serve as a communication guide for clinicians in the clinician-family meeting to facilitate shared decision-making.
No Intervention: Usual Care
No decision aid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of tool use by surrogate decision-makers
Time Frame: Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Data tracking analytics built into the tool will be employed to determine the extent to which the tools is used as per protocol.
Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Feasibility of enrolling surrogates in a stepped-wedge (before/after) clinical trial in a neurocritical care setting
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date
Measured by meeting target enrollment.
Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date
Feasibility of retaining surrogates in a neurocritical care setting
Time Frame: Three-months post SABI
The number of subjects that complete the long-term follow-up.
Three-months post SABI

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' ratings of usability of the tool (Intervention surrogates only)
Time Frame: Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Usability of the tool as measured with the System Usability Scale.
Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Participants' ratings of perceived effectiveness of the tool in preparing them for decision-making (Intervention surrogates only)
Time Frame: Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Perceived Effectiveness will be measured with an 11-item perceived effectiveness questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale.
Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Fidelity to intervention protocol
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date
Fidelity to the intervention protocol will be measured using self-checklists by clinicians and review of a random selection of 30% of the audio-recorded clinician-family meetings
Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' ratings of what they liked and disliked about the DA+C tool (Intervention surrogates only)
Time Frame: Until right before the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission
Measured by two open ended questions from the Acceptability Scale.
Until right before the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission
Surrogates' clarity about patient values & preferences
Time Frame: After the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission
We will apply the 3-item Values Clarity Subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale.
After the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission
Surrogates' ratings of the degree of shared decision-making
Time Frame: After the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission
We will apply six questions from Quality of Communication Scale pertaining to shared decision-making.
After the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission
Caregiver Burden
Time Frame: Three-months post SABI
Measured with the 5-item short form of the Caregiver Burden Scale.
Three-months post SABI
Decision Regret
Time Frame: Three-months post SABI
Measured using the Decision Regret Scale.
Three-months post SABI
Goals-of-care decision
Time Frame: Hospital discharge up until 3-months post SABI
Final goals-of-care decision by surrogates (survival vs. withdrawal of life sustaining treatments)
Hospital discharge up until 3-months post SABI
Mortality
Time Frame: Hospital discharge up until 3-months post SABI
Patient death
Hospital discharge up until 3-months post SABI
Functional status
Time Frame: 3-months post SABI
We will measure basic activities of daily living with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE; range 1-8) and the modified Rankin Scale (range 0-6)
3-months post SABI
Patient-perceived Patient- Centeredness of Care
Time Frame: 3-months post SABI
To assess patient centeredness of care adapted for use by surrogates
3-months post SABI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nils Henninger, MD, PhD, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
  • Principal Investigator: Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized data not published within the final manuscript will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of the main manuscript up until 5 years after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests should be made to the principal investigator susanne.muehlschlegel[at]umassmed.edu.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Web/mobile/tablet-based digital decision aid + communication (DA+C) tool

3
Subscribe