AOA Versus Non-AOA in Low Prognosis Patients by the POSEIDON Criteria

August 28, 2022 updated by: Mỹ Đức Hospital

The Effectiveness and Safety of Artificial Oocyte Activation With Calcium Ionophore in Low Prognosis Women Classified as POSEIDON Group 4: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Poor ovarian response (POR) remains one of the significant challenges of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Facing difficulties related to clinical practice, optimizing the embryo culture process is necessary to improve the embryo number and quality in this group of patients. Potential techniques mentioned in the current literature include follicular size at trigger, dual trigger, artificial oocyte activation (AOA), blastocyst transfer, and the role of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). AOA is currently expected to improve treatment outcomes in poor ovarian responders with the potential for clinical efficacy. However, this issue has not been evaluated before.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Poor ovarian response (POR) remains one of the significant challenges of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Patients with POR yield a low number of oocytes, leading to a low number of useable embryos and a decline in the live birth rate. According to the consensus of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) in 2011, POR was diagnosed using Bologna criteria. However, some recent studies show the classification by Bologna is not efficient, because the oocyte number should be combined with female age since the likelihood of achieving a live birth among patients with similar oocyte yield ultimately depends on the age of the patient. In 2016, POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) Group was established and released the new criteria. The POSEIDON criteria proposed a shift from the terminology of POR to the concept of low prognosis. According to POSEIDON criteria, low prognosis account for 30-40% of all stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. The low prognosis patient is classified into four groups according to the results of ovarian reserve markers (AMH, AFC, or both), female age, and the number of oocytes retrieved in previous cycles, such as: maternal age < 35, AMH ≥ 1,2 ng/ml and AFC ≥ 5 (subgroup 1a: < 4 oocytes; subgroup 1b: 4-9 oocytes); maternal age ≥ 35, AMH ≥ 1,2 ng/ml and AFC ≥ 5 (subgroup 2a: < 4 oocytes; subgroup 2b: 4-9 oocytes); maternal age < 35, AMH < 1,2 ng/ml and AFC < 5; maternal age ≥ 35, AMH < 1,2 ng/mL and AFC < 5. Although many efforts have been made to improve treatment outcomes in this group of patients, such as researching, understanding, and modifying clinical ovarian stimulation regimens, the results are still not feasible. Especially, group 4, which have advanced maternal age (≥ 35) and seized for 14.4% of low prognosis, has a low cumulative live birth rate (11% in group 4). Female age is a critical element in the POSEIDON classification because age is crucially related to embryo ploidy and more importantly live birth outcome. The probability of having embryo ploidy sharply declined after the age of 34 and was lower than 50% in women aged 35 years and over. Therefore, patients in group 4 will have an increased risk of aneuploidy embryos, decreasing the live birth rate in these groups of patients. A recent study evaluated cumulative live birth rates per cycle, there was a remarkable difference between POSEIDON patients (21, 43, 10, 25, 29, and 17% in groups 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3, and 4, respectively) and non-POSEIDON counterparts (52%). Facing difficulties related to clinical practice, optimizing the embryo culture process is necessary to improve the embryo number and quality in the POR group. Potential techniques include follicular size at the trigger, dual trigger, artificial oocyte activation (AOA), blastocyst transfer, and the role of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

In Vietnam, AOA was first reported in 2011, performing on 1588 oocytes, and said the fertilization rate was higher in the ICSI - AOA than in the ICSI group (80.8% vs 74.3%, respectively; p<0.002).

AOA is expected to improve treatment outcomes for low prognosis patients, especially in group 4 by the POSEIDON criteria with the potential for clinical efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AOA on treatment outcomes in low prognosis patients defined by the POSEIDON criteria (2016).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

528

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Was diagnosed as low prognosis patients by the POSEIDON criteria in group 4: maternal age ≥ 35 years old, AMH < 1,2 ng/ml and AFC < 5
  • Cycles ≤ 3
  • Oocytes could be collected with OPU procedure
  • Ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist protocol
  • Agree to participate in the randomization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uterine abnormalities such as unicornuate, bicornuate uterus, didelphys and adenomyosis
  • Recent history of any current untreated endocrine abnormality
  • Gonadotropin resistance syndrome
  • Contraindications of gonadotropins
  • Absolute asthernozoospermia
  • Cryptozoospermia
  • Surgical sperm retrieval
  • Previous low fertilization (< 30%)
  • Globozoospermia
  • Cycles using donor oocytes
  • Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) cycles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ICSI with AOA

The oocytes were transferred into the calcium ionophore activation solution for two times of post-ICSI AOA (Ionomycin concentration of 10 µM).

Then the oocytes will be washed several times using the medium drops in dish AOA and dish ICSI, then divided into drops with maximum 3 oocytes per drop for culturing. After that, the culture dish will be put in the K-system G185 incubator at 37oC, 6% CO2, and 5% O2.

Step 1: All post-ICSI oocytes will be added in the medium drop in AOA dish, these oocytes will be placed in the incubator at 37oC, 6% CO2, and 5% O2 for 20 minutes.

Step 2: After 20 minutes, calcium ionophore stock (Sigma-Aldrich - USA) will be diluted into 10µM drops in AOA dish.

Step 3: After 10 minutes of incubation, all post-ICSI oocytes will be moved to the AOA drop, then this dish will be put back in the incubator for 10 minutes.

Step 4: After 10 minutes, all the oocytes in drop AOA will be moved to another drop for rinsing and then put back in the incubator for 20 minutes.

Step 5: After 20 minutes, the oocytes will be moved into drop AOA and then put back in the incubator for 10 minutes.

Step 6: After 10 minutes, all post-ICSI oocytes will be added in the medium drop, then divided into drops with maximum 3 oocytes per drop for culturing. After that, the culture dish will be put in the K-system G185 incubator at 37oC, 6% CO2, and 5% O2

Active Comparator: ICSI without AOA
Post-ICSI oocytes will be cultured in drops containing the Sage - 1 - StepSM medium (maximum 3 oocytes per drop) at 37oC, 6% CO2 and 5% O2 in K-system G185 incubator.
Conventional ICSI procedure will be performed without the application of AOA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Live birth rate
Time Frame: At 24 weeks of gestation
The complete expulsion or extraction from a woman of a product of fertilisation, after 24 completed weeks of gestational age; which, after such separation, breathes or shows any other evidence of life, such as heart beat, umbilical cord pulsation or definite movement of voluntary muscles, irrespective of whether the umbilical cord has been cut or the placenta is attached. A birth weight of 350 grams or more can be used if gestational age is unknown (twins are a single count).
At 24 weeks of gestation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fertilization rate
Time Frame: One day after oocyte retrieval
The percentage of transformation of micro injected oocytes into two pronuclei
One day after oocyte retrieval
Fertilization failure rate
Time Frame: One day after oocyte retrieval
The percentage transformation of micro injected oocytes into no pronuclei
One day after oocyte retrieval
Abnormal fertilization rate
Time Frame: One day after oocyte retrieval
The percentage transformation of micro injected oocytes into more than two pronuclei
One day after oocyte retrieval
Total embryos on day 3
Time Frame: Three days after oocyte retrieval
Number of embryos on day 3
Three days after oocyte retrieval
Good quality day 3 embryo rate
Time Frame: Three days after oocyte retrieval
Number of good quality embryos on day 3
Three days after oocyte retrieval
Total embryos blastocyst
Time Frame: Five days after oocyte retrieval
Number of embryos on day 5
Five days after oocyte retrieval
Good quality blastocyst rate
Time Frame: Five days after oocyte retrieval
Number of good quality embryos on day 5
Five days after oocyte retrieval
Positive pregnancy test
Time Frame: At 2 weeks after embryo placement
Serum ß-hCG ≥25mIU/mL
At 2 weeks after embryo placement
Implantation rate
Time Frame: At 3 weeks after embryo placement
Implantation rate is explained as as the number of gestational sacs per number of embryos transferred.
At 3 weeks after embryo placement
Cumulative implantation rate at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative implantation rate.

Cumulative implantation is total case of gestational sacs per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Clinical pregnancy
Time Frame: At 7 weeks after embryo placement]
Having at least 1 gestational sac on ultrasound at 5 weeks' gestation
At 7 weeks after embryo placement]
Cumulative clinical pregnancy at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate.

Cumulative Clinical pregnancy is total case clinical pregnancy per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Ongoing pregnancy
Time Frame: At 12 weeks after embryo placement
Having at least 1 gestational sac on ultrasound at 12 weeks' gestation with heart beat activity
At 12 weeks after embryo placement
Cumulative ongoing pregnancy at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate.

Cumulative ongoing pregnancy is total case ongoing pregnancy per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Ectopic pregnancy
Time Frame: At 12 weeks of gestation
A pregnancy outside the uterine cavity, diagnosed by ultrasound, surgical visualisation, or histopathology
At 12 weeks of gestation
Cumulative ectopic pregnancy at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative ectopic pregnancy rate.

Cumulative ectopic pregnancy is total case ectopic pregnancy per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Miscarriage
Time Frame: At 12 weeks of gestation
The spontaneous loss of an intra-uterine pregnancy prior to 12 completed weeks of gestational age
At 12 weeks of gestation
Cumulative miscarriage
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative miscarriage rate.

Cumulative miscarriage is total case miscarriage per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Multiple pregnancy
Time Frame: At 6 to 8 weeks' gestation
≥1 gestational sac at early pregnancy ultrasound
At 6 to 8 weeks' gestation
Cumulative multiple pregnancy
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative multiple pregnancy rate.

Cumulative multiple pregnancy is total case multiple pregnancy per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Vanishing twins
Time Frame: At 12 weeks' gestation
Vanishing twins is defined as a pregnancy with two or more gestational sacs or positive heart beats at 7 weeks of gestation, but only one at 12 weeks' gestation.
At 12 weeks' gestation
Cumulative vanishing twins
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative vanishing twins rate.

Cumulative vanishing twins is total case vanishing twins per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Multiple delivery
Time Frame: At 24 weeks' gestation
Birth of more than one baby beyond 24 weeks
At 24 weeks' gestation
Cumulative multiple delivery
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization

After 12 months, most patients doing IVF have finished all their frozen embryos; therefore, we consider this time point for analyzing the cumulative multiple delivery rate.

Cumulative multiple delivery is total case multiple delivery per total patient to be enrolled into the study at 12 months after randomization

12 months after randomization
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Time Frame: At 20 weeks of gestation or beyond after the completion of the first transfer
Pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
At 20 weeks of gestation or beyond after the completion of the first transfer
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: At 24 to 28 weeks of gestation
using a 75g oral glucose tolerance test
At 24 to 28 weeks of gestation
Cumulative live birth rate
Time Frame: At 24 weeks of gestation
Cumulative live birth rate at 12 months after the randomization.
At 24 weeks of gestation
Birth weight
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
Weight of singletons and twins
At the time of delivery
Low birth weight
Time Frame: At birth
Weight < 2500 gm at birth
At birth
Major congenital abnormalities
Time Frame: At birth
Structural, functional, and genetic anomalies, that occur during pregnancy, and identified antenatally, at birth, or later in life, and require surgical repair of a defect, or are visually evident, or are life-threatening, or cause death. Any congenital anomaly will be included as followed definition of congenital abnormalities in Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies by Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, NCBDDD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020).
At birth
High birth weight
Time Frame: At birth
Weight >4000 gm at birth
At birth
Very low birth weight
Time Frame: At birth
Weight < 1500 gm at birth
At birth
Large for gestational age
Time Frame: At birth
defined as birth weight >90th centile for gestation, based on standardised ethnicity based charts
At birth
small for gestational age
Time Frame: At birth
defined as less than 10th centile for gestational age at delivery based on standardised ethnicity based charts
At birth
Very high birth weight
Time Frame: At birth
Weight >4500 gm at birth
At birth
Antepartum haemorrhage
Time Frame: At birth
including placenta previa, placenta accreta and unexplained
At birth
Perinatal mortality
Time Frame: 24 weeks of gestation to the end of the neonatal period of 4 weeks after birth
the death of a fetus or infant from 24 weeks of gestation to the end of the neonatal period of 4 weeks after birth.
24 weeks of gestation to the end of the neonatal period of 4 weeks after birth
Admission to NICU
Time Frame: At birth
The admittance of the newborn to NICU
At birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tuong M Ho, M.D, Mỹ Đức Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 04/2022/MĐ-HĐĐĐ

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on in Vitro Fertilization

Clinical Trials on ICSI with AOA

Subscribe