Insula Neuromodulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain

A Staged, Comprehensive Investigation of Insular Neuromodulation for Treatment-refractory, Chronic Neuropathic Pain

This study will comprehensively investigate the insula as a brain target for neuromodulation to treat chronic neuropathic pain.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Chronic Pain; Neuropathic Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: neuromodulation

Detailed Description

In the first stage, 12 subjects with refractory neuropathic pain will be enrolled to an inpatient clinical trial for insular brain mapping with acute stimulation and neurophysiological brain monitoring. Electrodes for stimulation and recording will be implanted stereotactically along the anterior-posterior axis of the insular cortex. 'Responders' to trial stimulation and the optimal region of the insula for pain relief will be identified during this inpatient stage.

'Responder' subjects who have positive analgesic effects from acute insular stimulation during the first stage will continue to the second stage. The second stage, clinical trial is conducted outpatient and will test chronic deep brain stimulation of the insula. The study design is randomized, sham-stimulation-controlled, double-blinded, and cross-over where subjects receive both active and sham stimulation. Furthermore, neurophysiological biomarkers of pain will be investigated by studying changes in neural activity.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 12
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Judy Beenhakker; Phone Number: 434-982-1856; Email: jgb3p@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Zak Sturgill; Phone Number: 434-243-9986; Email: ffm7rc@virginia.edu

Study Locations

• United States
  • Virginia
    • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
      • Recruiting
      • University of Virginia
      • Contact: Zak Sturgill; Phone Number: 434-243-9986; Email: ffm7rc@virginia.edu
      • Contact: Jeff Elias, MD

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men and women, between 18 and 80 years, inclusive
2. Subjects who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits

3. The pain is:

   • chronic with ≥6 month duration
   • severe is defined as: 'average' NPRS score of ≥ 5 out of 10 at current visit and the subject reports having a similar level of pain for at least the past two months
   • disabling and has resulted in an inability to work or perform ADLs in the home
   • medication-refractory to adequate trials of at least 3 prescription medications (including at least one current or past opioid) commonly used for symptomatic relief of pain. An adequate medication trial is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication without sufficient effect.
   • treatment-resistant and cannot be treated or has failed procedures including interventional therapies with injections, spinal neuromodulation with medication infusion or stimulation, and neurosurgical ablation surgery.

4. The pain is neuropathic or predominantly neuropathic if mixed components.

   • Subject suffering from a pure neuropathic pain syndrome will be included if the pain has resulted from a specific injury including trauma, ischemia, hemorrhage, infection, tumor or iatrogenic to either the peripheral (nerve, spinal root, plexus, cranial nerve) or to the central nervous system (spinal cord or brain) Etiologies include:
   • Poststroke pain
   • Thalamic pain
   • Spinal cord injury
   • Brachial plexus injury or limb avulsion
   • Peripheral nerve injury or painful neuropathy
   • Postherpetic neuralgia, Tolosa Hunt syndrome, or cavernous sinus syndromes
   • Trigeminal neuropathic pain (not trigeminal neuralgia)
5. Insula region must be apparent on MRI so that direct targeting can be performed for SEEG and DBS electrode placement.
6. Able to communicate and report sensations during all stimulation testing
7. Stable prescribed doses of all symptomatic pain medications for 30 days prior to study entry and for the duration of the study.
8. Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been agreed upon by the principal investigator and the pain psychologist, both of whom have interviewed, examined and if appropriate provided psychotherapeutic intervention to the subject.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Idiopathic pain syndromes will be excluded. Examples include:

   1. Fibromyalgia syndrome
   2. temporomandibular joint disorders
   3. irritable bowel syndrome
   4. chronic headaches
   5. interstitial cystitis
   6. chronic pelvic pain
   7. whiplash-associated disorders

2. Subjects deemed poor candidates by a multidisciplinary team of pain clinicians including specialists in neurosurgery, pain management, and pain psychology:

   1. Significant clinician concern(s) about reliability of subject-reported information, such as subject in active process of seeking disability for neuropathic pain
   2. Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse as defined by the criteria outlined in the DSM-V as manifested by one (or more) of the following occurring within a 12 month period: Recurrent substance use resulting in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home (such as repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use; substance-related absences, suspensions, or expulsions from school; or neglect of children or household). Recurrent substance use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (such as driving an automobile or operating a machine when impaired by substance use)
   3. Recurrent substance-related legal problems (such as arrests for substance related disorderly conduct)
   4. Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of the substance (for example, arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication and physical fights).
   5. Suspected dementia based on neuropsychological screening or Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) Score < 25

3. Subjects with active psychiatric illness will be excluded. For the purpose of this study, active psychiatric illness includes:

   1. History of significant psychiatric disorder (e.g., comorbid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation/attempts) that could interfere with interpretation of study endpoints.
   2. Exhibiting current suicide ideation and/or a history of suicide attempt within past 2 years
   3. been hospitalized for the treatment of a psychiatric illness within the past 2 years
   4. received transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression treatment
   5. received electroconvulsive therapy for depression
   6. any presence or history of psychosis

4. Subjects with unstable cardiac status including:

   1. Unstable angina pectoris on medication
   2. Subjects with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
   3. Significant congestive heart failure defined with ejection fraction < 40
   4. Subjects with unstable ventricular arrhythmias
   5. Subjects with atrial arrhythmias that are not rate-controlled
5. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
6. Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.

7. On medications that increases the bleeding risk, based on the published guidelines41 which are currently recognized by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Pain Medicine and the North American Neuromodulation Society; specifically:

   1. Aspirin or another antiplatelet medication (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, abiciximab) for the last 7 days prior to treatment.
   2. Oral, subcutaneous or intravenous anticoagulant medications, such as oral vitamin K inhibitors for the last 7 days, non-vitamin K inhibitor oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban) for the last 72 hours.
   3. Intravenous or subcutaneous heparin-derived compounds for the last 48 hours.
8. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate prolonged hospitalization with continuous video EEG monitoring
9. Subjects participating or have participated in another clinical trial to investigate or treat chronic pain in the last 30 days
10. Subjects with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding from a documented coagulopathy or if their serum coagulation studies (platelet count, PT, PTT, and INR) exceed the institutional laboratory limits.
11. Subjects with brain tumors or any significant intracranial mass.
12. Subjects with a history of seizure
13. Any illness that in the investigator's opinion preclude participation in this study
14. Pregnancy or lactation
15. Subjects with a true allergy to opioid medications which would preclude PET imaging
16. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
17. Subjects with a deep brain stimulation implant
18. History of hemorrhagic stroke or cerebrovascular event within the past year of treatment exhibiting incomplete resolution

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control; Subjects who respond favorably to test/trial stimulation of the insula will be implanted with DBS devices. In an outpatient clinical trial, each subject will receive 3 months of active stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation. The assignment for stimulation will be randomized and blinded to the subject and to the outcome assessors.	Device: neuromodulation; During the inpatient phase of the study, insular mapping will be performed with electrical stimulation to implanted SEEG electrodes in order to optimize the region for trial stimulation. Subjects who respond favorably to trial stimulation in the hospital, will progress to the outpatient clinical trial phase where a DBS system will be implanted. All subjects will be blindly randomized to 3 months of stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation.; Other Names: deep brain stimulation
Active Comparator: DBS of the insula; Subjects who respond favorably to test/trial stimulation of the insula will be implanted with DBS devices. In an outpatient clinical trial, each subject will receive 3 months of active stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation. The assignment for stimulation will be randomized and blinded to the subject and to the outcome assessors.	Device: neuromodulation; During the inpatient phase of the study, insular mapping will be performed with electrical stimulation to implanted SEEG electrodes in order to optimize the region for trial stimulation. Subjects who respond favorably to trial stimulation in the hospital, will progress to the outpatient clinical trial phase where a DBS system will be implanted. All subjects will be blindly randomized to 3 months of stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation.; Other Names: deep brain stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Adverse events	Adverse event reporting will be collected throughout the study period. This will include neurological assessments by the study team postoperatively using the NIH Stroke Scale, MR imaging of implanted electrodes, comprehensive assessment of mood and cognition by a licensed psychologist, and vigilance for suicide with the asQ Screening Tool.	Entire study period from enrollment through 6 months post DBS implantation
Pain intensity	The primary efficacy outcome measure compares the change in pain intensity, as rated by the blinded subjects using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), between bilateral DBS of the insula and sham stimulation. The NPRS is an 11 point scale where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the "worst possible pain." Clinical pain severity will be assessed daily in the home environment with a 7-day Ecological Momentary Assessment (NPRS rating) aggregated across days. The analysis will focus on DBS-ON Week 12 data relative to the DBS-OFF (Sham) Week 12 data, controlling for Baseline data.	Baseline, 3 months post DBS stimulation, 3 months post sham stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Virginia
• Collaborators: Boston Scientific Corporation
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Jeff Elias, MD, University of Virginia

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Liu CC, Moosa S, Quigg M, Elias WJ. Anterior insula stimulation increases pain threshold in humans: a pilot study. J Neurosurg. 2021 Apr 2;135(5):1487-1492. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.JNS203323. Print 2021 Nov 1.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 1, 2022
• Primary Completion (Estimated): June 30, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): June 29, 2027

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 26, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 31, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): June 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): December 10, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 4, 2024
• Last Verified: May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: deep brain stimulation; neuromodulation; insula; stereoencephalography
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Nervous System Diseases; Neuromuscular Diseases; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Chronic Pain; Neuralgia
• Other Study ID Numbers: G200049

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No