'Digitalization in Psychoeducation' The Effect of Tele-Psychoeducation on Problem-Solving Skills and Stress

June 7, 2022 updated by: Gizem Beycan Ekitli, PhD., Ege University

'Digitalization in Psychoeducation' The Effect of Tele-Psychoeducation on Problem-Solving Skills and Stress: A Randomized Factorial Trial

The effect of tele-psychoeducation based on an online social media platform, which had never been done previously, on problem-solving skills and stress levels in young adults was investigated. A randomized, single-blind factorial trial was conducted with two groups of 54 university students who met the inclusion criteria. Cognitive behavioural based psychoeducation was carried on via Instagram's both online and asynchronized sessions for 8 weeks. Data were collected using pre-/posttest and follow-up measurements with the Problem-Solving Inventory and Perceived Stress Scale and were analysed using factorial analysis of variance. ηp2 and Cohen's r was used, which shows the effect size with variance distribution.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The research hypotheses are as follows:

  1. H1: There is a significant difference between the mean scores of the Problem Solving Inventory in favour of the intervention group in the time series.
  2. H1: There is a significant difference between the mean scores of the Perceived Stress Scale in favour of the intervention group in the time series.
  3. H1: The recently developed group tele-psychoeducational intervention is effective for reducing Problem Solving Inventory mean scores.
  4. H1: The recently developed group tele-psychoeducational intervention is effective for reducing Perceived Stress Scale mean scores.

Research data was collected with an online survey tool (Googledocs) that does not require a usage fee or license. The tool is convenient and economical in that it is suitable for use with any electronic device that can connect to the internet. The developed online form was piloted with ten students. Arrangements were made for the clarity of the questions and the convenience of the online tool. Pilot study data was not included in the findings. The tools detailed below were used to collect the data.

Personal Data Collection Form: This form consists of 11 multiple-choice questions to determine the variables that may have an impact on the sociodemographic characteristics, health history, and problem-solving skills of the participants. The questions were prepared by the research team in the light of the literature.

Problem Solving Inventory: The Problem Solving Inventory (PSI), developed by Heppner and Petersen (1982), is a Likert-type scale, scored between 1 and 6, consisting of 35 items that measure adults' self-perception of problem solving skills. There are items that are reverse coded and excluded from scoring. The higher total scores obtained from the scale indicate that the individual perceives himself as inadequate in terms of problem solving skills. The Cronbach alpha consistency coefficient of the original scale was .90, and the coefficients obtained for the subscales were between .72 and .85. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Şahin et al. (1993), and the Cronbach alpha consistency coefficient was found to be .88. In our study, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was .78.

Perceived Stress Scale: The scale was developed by Cohen et al. (1983), and adapted into Turkish by Eskin et al. (2013). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is designed to measure how stressful situations in one's life are perceived. Five-point Likert-type scale items are interpreted over the total score and two sub-dimensions (Perception of Insufficient Self-efficacy and Perception of Stress Discomfort). A high total score indicates that the person perceives the stress he/she has been loaded with as high; it is interpreted as the methods used in coping with stress are not functional, and therefore they cannot cope with stress effectively. In our study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was determined as .75.

Data Collection: Data collection in the study was planned in line with the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES), which can be considered as a method and reporting guide for online survey research. The research's data security was ensured via a user account to which only two members of the research team had access and which would not be shared with any other user, and the access link was terminated when the data collection process was completed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İzmir, Turkey
        • Ege University Faculty of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 26 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being adult
  • Being volunteer to participation
  • Must be have the required technological opportunities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To receive a professional support that can affect coping skills during the data collection process
  • Not participate in 20% of tele-psychoeducational interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

Problem Solving Approach based problem solving skills psychoeducation's session topics of eight weeks are as follows:

  1. Introduction and warm-up,
  2. Problem orientation-identifying the problem,
  3. Identifying prior problems-Which do I want to start from?
  4. Recognizing the losses caused by problems and complaints,
  5. Setting reachable and realistic goals,
  6. Generating alternatives -What can I do?
  7. Regulating emotions,
  8. Experimenting and exploring. The main outcomes of each session were determined, and sessions were completed in approximately one hour as a semi-structured interactive group training according to group dynamics.

Three days a week for eight weeks, informative posts were shared, asynchronous testing and self-discovery activities were carried out, and a synchronous tele-psychoeducation session was held once a week. Participants were connected to the live broadcast of the research team and interacted via text messages.

No Intervention: Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Problem Solving Inventory (first evaluation with posttest)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 months
The Problem Solving Inventory (PSI), developed by Heppner and Petersen (1982), is a Likert-type scale, scored between 1 and 6, consisting of 35 items that measure adults' self-perception of problem solving skills. There are items that are reverse coded and excluded from scoring. The higher total scores obtained from the scale indicate that the individual perceives himself as inadequate in terms of problem solving skills. The Cronbach alpha consistency coefficient of the original scale was .90, and the coefficients obtained for the subscales were between .72 and .85 (Heppner & Petersen, 1982). The scale was adapted to Turkish by Şahin et al. (1993), and the Cronbach alpha consistency coefficient was found to be .88. In our study, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was .78.
Through study completion, an average of 4 months
Perceived Stress Scale (first evaluation with posttest)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 months
The scale was developed by Cohen et al. (1983), and adapted into Turkish by Eskin et al. (2013). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is designed to measure how stressful situations in one's life are perceived. Five-point Likert-type scale items are interpreted over the total score and two sub-dimensions (Perception of Insufficient Self-efficacy and Perception of Stress Discomfort). A high total score indicates that the person perceives the stress he/she has been loaded with as high; it is interpreted as the methods used in coping with stress are not functional, and therefore they cannot cope with stress effectively. In our study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was determined as .75.
Through study completion, an average of 4 months
Problem Solving Inventory (second evaluation with follow up)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Perceived Stress Scale (second evaluation with follow up)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Through study completion, an average of 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on digitalized group psychoeducation

Subscribe