Artificial Intelligence to Search for Abnormalities in Ambulatory Cancer Patients (IASAAC)

November 29, 2023 updated by: Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

During treatment, cancer patients may experience side effects related to their disease but also to the different treatments they receive.

Currently, adverse effects and toxicities are well codified in the oncology community, notably via the NCI CTCAE criteria.

Unlike objective data such as a blood sample or a CTscan, a major bias in patient assessment is the subjective assessment of the physician or its team at a given time, which may not reflect the overall situation (for better or worse). Several studies had already highlighted the discrepancies between medical and patient data collection.

Self-assessment of symptoms is one way to overcome this bias. Moreover, there are now a large number of solutions that allow to perform these self-assessments at home.

Thanks to these tools, there are now two situations, the scheduled evaluation (before a chemotherapy treatment, or after a surgical procedure for instance) and the unscheduled situations, where it is the patient himself who can trigger an evaluation form.

These new evaluation methods also allow to take a quality of life approach. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is now a valid evidence-based assay to detect patient's symptoms and therefore provide helpful clinical information to healthcare providers.

The goal of this study is to go one step further than the previous PROs studies and evaluate the ability to train a machine learning algorithm to detect at-risk situations and lay the foundation for a viable solution for future prospective and randomized trials.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54500
        • Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Follow-up for a solid tumor
  • Chemotherapy treatment (oral and/or injectable) scheduled or in progress
  • Life expectancy > 3 months
  • Performance Status (PS) < 3
  • Have an internet connection or assistance to answer questions throughout the study (nurse, family members, etc.)
  • Patient having understood, signed and dated the consent form
  • Patient affiliated to the social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of means to answer the online questionnaires
  • Patient in another therapeutic trial with an experimental molecule
  • Patients and their families who cannot read or speak French
  • Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship (including curatorship)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient Self-Reporting of Symptoms

At baseline, clinical research staff will:

  • verify the possibility of an internet connection at the patient's home
  • help the patient to fill in the 1st questionnaire (baseline questionnaire - frailty)

Every two weeks for 3 months:

  • patients complete questionnaires via app (toxicity; quality of life, medication adherence)
  • responses are verified by clinical research staff
  • In case of severe symptoms, the clinician contacts the patient and arranges for management.

At the end of the study :

- patients answer a satisfaction questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of unscheduled medical consultations or re-hospitalisations
Time Frame: 3 months
The number of unscheduled medical consultations or re-hospitalisations will be assessed based on abnormalities identified through the patient's self-report of symptoms.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient satisfaction will be assessed according to the Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire (1= almost never : 5 = almost always)
3 months
Occurrence of toxicities
Time Frame: 3 months
The occurrence of toxicities will be evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE v5.0 classification
3 months
Dose of treatments
Time Frame: 3 months
The total dose of treatments given will be calculated from the total dose of chemotherapy received per course and the collection of dose adjustments.
3 months
Adherence to oral treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
Adherence to oral treatments will be assessed by the Morisky questionnaire
3 months
Handling of the digital tool
Time Frame: 3 months
Handling of the digital tool will be assessed by the System Usability Scale ( 0 =Strongly disagree; 10=Strongly agree)
3 months
Anticipation of the preparation of injectable chemotherapy
Time Frame: 3 months
Anticipation of injectable chemotherapy preparations will be evaluated based on the number of treatments ordered and actually administered, without the need to call the patient.
3 months
Predicting the occurrence of sarcopenia
Time Frame: 3 months
The occurrence of sarcopenia will be measured by the body mass/fat mass ratio using the CT scan performed for tumor evaluation
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: LAMBERT AURELIEN, MD, Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor

Clinical Trials on Patient Self-Reporting of Symptoms

Subscribe