Efficacy and Feasibility of an eHealth Intervention for Pregnant Women on Diet, Physical Activity and Knowledge Related to Pregnancy (EmbarApp)

December 26, 2024 updated by: Rubén Martín Payo, University of Oviedo

A pragmatic clinical trial are developed with the aim to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of using an app as complement of the usual care that receive pregnancy women in a sanitary area in the Principado de Asturias (Spain).

Participants are pregnancy women attended in the sanitary area number 3 of the Pincipado de Asturias. As inclusion criteria we will consider: i) aged over 18; ii) pregnant with only 1 fetus; iii) low risk pregnancy; iv) smartphone Access; v) signed the informed consent. As exclusion criteria: i) non-fluent Spanish speaker; ii) do not fill the questionnaires.

A randon sample of 153 women will be recruited consequtively, at the first triemester, from the midwife consulting room. Those women to agreed to participate, and sign the infomred consent, will be anonymizated using a alphanumerical code and asigned (according to a previous randomization distribution by code) to a control or an intervention group.

All women are going to receive the baseline and post intervention questionnaires by email. All women are going to receive the usual care. Adittionally, those in the intervention group, will be prompted to use iNATAL app.

The following questionnaires and measures will be used: uMARS Questionnaire to assess and percentage of app usage tot assess the feasibility; to assess the effectiveness: Motiva.Diaf to assess dietary and physical activity recommendations; ad hoc questionnaire to assess knwoldedge pregnancy related; mother complications during of after the pregnancy period and newborn complications.

The intervention takes all pregnancy period.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

153

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Asturias
      • Oviedo, Asturias, Spain, 33006
        • University of Oviedo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged over 18
  • pregnant with only 1 fetus
  • low risk pregnancy
  • smartphone Access
  • signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-fluent Spanish speaker
  • do not fill the baseline or post-intervention questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
  1. Sign consent form and baseline assessments
  2. Usual care
  3. Post intervention assessments
Experimental: Interention group
  1. Sign consent form and baseline assessments
  2. Usual care + app iNATAL
  3. Post intervention assessments
usual care plus app ussage with the aim of promote healthy behaviors (diet, physical activity and weight)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Following dietary recommendations (mean)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline dietary recommendations at 8 or 9 months (depending the pregnancy)
For both groups. Compliance with dietary recommendations. We are going to use the Motiva.Diaf questionnaire. It includes 7 questions to assess healthy diatery adherence. Response in dichotomous option 0 (not follow the recommendation) or 1 (follow the recommendation). Total score range from 0 (null dietary compliance) to 7 (best dietary compliance).
Change from Baseline dietary recommendations at 8 or 9 months (depending the pregnancy)
Following physical activity recommendations (mean)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline dietary recommendations at 8 or 9 months (depending the pregnancy)
For both groups. Compliance with dietary recommendations. We are going to use the Motiva.Diaf questionnaire. It includes 5 questions to assess healthy diatery adherence. Response in dichotomous option 0 (not follow the recommendation) or 1 (follow the recommendation). Total score range from 0 (null dietary compliance) to 5 (best dietary compliance).
Change from Baseline dietary recommendations at 8 or 9 months (depending the pregnancy)
Change in pregnancy knwoledge (mean)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline dietary recommendations at 8 or 9 months (depending the pregnancy)
For both groups. Ad hoc questionnaire that includes 10 questions related with pregnancy care. Response in dichotomous option 0 (wrong answer) or 1 (correct answer). Total score range from 0 (null knowledge) to 7 (best knowledge).
Change from Baseline dietary recommendations at 8 or 9 months (depending the pregnancy)
App ussage
Time Frame: At the end of the intervention (8-9 after baseline)
Only for intervention group. Use the app during pregnancy period time. Dichotomous answer (yes or not).
At the end of the intervention (8-9 after baseline)
Newborn complications (mean)
Time Frame: From birth to one week after.
Number of complication suffer by the newborn in the first week after the birth.
From birth to one week after.
Women weigh gain (mean)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention (8-9 months after baseline)
Weigh improvement in kilograms during the pregnancy period time
From baseline to the end of the intervention (8-9 months after baseline)
App quality (mean)
Time Frame: At the end of the intervention (8-9 after baseline)
Only for intervention group. We are going to use the Spanish version of uMARS to assess the objective and subjetive quality of the app. Both dimensions has a total score range from 1 (lowest quality) to 5 (higher quality).
At the end of the intervention (8-9 after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021.490

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Related

Clinical Trials on App intervention

Subscribe