Immediately Placed Implant Sealed With Platelets Rich Fibrin Versus Cyanoacrylate Glue

June 27, 2022 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Assessment of Soft Tissue Healing Over Immediately Placed Implant Sealed With Platelets Rich Fibrin (Prf) Versus Cyanoacrylate Glue (a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

The health of peri-implant soft tissues is one of the most important aspects necessary for the long-term survival of dental implants. The importance of the peri-implant mucosal region lies in the need to establish a tight seal that isolates the implant and the bone from the oral environment. Study objective is to clinically compare the soft tissue healing, height, and thickness over immediate implants placed in type I sockets sealed by PRF to those sealed by a Cyanoacrylate glue.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

the study will be conducted on 16 extraction sockets in humans. Sockets will be randomly divided into two groups: Group I (test) will comprise 8 sockets sealed by PRF after immediate implant placement. Group II: (test) will comprise 8 sockets sealed by cyanoacrylate glue after immediate implant placement

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any non-restorable hopeless tooth; a badly decayed tooth that cannot be restored, a Tooth with failed endodontic treatment, and tooth with longitudinal fracture.
  • Post-extraction sockets type 1 with all bony walls intact; Type I extraction sockets according to Elian classification in 2007 have an intact labial plate of the bone and no soft tissue recession. Therefore, it does not require a mucoperiosteal flap elevation, only bone graft particles are packed into the socket after atraumatic extraction and socket debridement, then sealed with barrier membranes or soft tissue graft
  • A good standard of oral hygiene.
  • No signs of active periodontal disease in the selected tooth.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of any systemic disease that could complicate bone or soft tissue healing after immediate implant placement.
  • The presence of Acute periapical infection.
  • The presence of any local factor that may interfere with extraction as tooth ankyloses. (
  • Subjects who had undergone therapeutical radiation. (38)
  • Patients who had been subjected to or who were under bisphosphonate therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
8 sockets that will be treated by immediate implant placement and sealed by PRF.
EXPERIMENTAL: Study group
8 sockets that will be treated by immediate implant placement and sealed by a Cyanoacrylate glue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in soft tissue healing
Time Frame: at 2nd week and 4th week

Soft tissue healing will be assessed in both groups in reference to the soft tissue healing index according to Landry index Landry index scores

Very poor: Tissue color: ≥50% of gingiva red Response to palpation: BleedingGranulation tissue: PresentIncision margin: Not epithelialized, with loss of epithelium beyond incision marginSuppuration: Present

Poor: Tissue color: ≥50% of gingiva red Response to palpation: BleedingGranulation tissue: PresentIncision margin: Not epithelialized, with connective tissue exposed

Good: Tissue colour: ≥25% and<50% of gingiva redResponse to palpation: No bleedingGranulation tissue: NoneIncision margin: No connective tissue exposed

Very good: Tissue colour: <25% of gingiva redResponse to palpation: No bleedingGranulation tissue: NoneIncision margin: No connective tissue exposed

Excellent: Tissue color: All tissues pinkResponse to palpation: No bleedingGranulation tissue: NoneIncision margin: No connective tissue exposed

at 2nd week and 4th week
Change in Mid crestal soft tissue thickness
Time Frame: at baseline and after 4 weeks
Mid crestal soft tissue thickness over the immediate implant will be measured using a periodontal probe passing through soft tissue in the intersection midpoint of both buccolingual and mesiodistal dimensions of the socket till cover screw, after 4 weeks postoperatively
at baseline and after 4 weeks
change in Mid-buccal soft tissue height
Time Frame: at baseline and after 4 weeks
Mid-buccal soft tissue height: will be measured from gingival margin to implant platform, at surgery time and 4 weeks postoperatively
at baseline and after 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 12, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Cyanoacrylates_2021

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Socket

Clinical Trials on Cyanoacrylate glue

Subscribe