Effect of Participation in Virtual Exercise Sessions in Persons With Aphasia

February 5, 2024 updated by: Michelle Gravier, California State University, East Bay

Effect of Participation in Virtual Exercise Sessions on Physical Activity, Language and Cognitive Functioning, and Quality of Life in Persons With Aphasia

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of an online exercise program for community-dwelling individuals with aphasia, a language disorder resulting from brain damage. Physical activity, language, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes will be collected to assess potential effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Approximately one-third of stroke survivors have aphasia, acquired language difficulty that affects the ability speak and understand others. However, despite documented benefits of interventions to promote physical activity (PA) after stroke, including improved health-related quality of life (QoL), social and emotional benefits, and improved cognition, individuals with aphasia are often excluded from this research due to their communication difficulties. This is particularly concerning, given that individuals with aphasia are at greater risk of social isolation and depression compared to stroke survivors without aphasia. Presently, limited research has been conducted that examines the effect of PA interventions in individuals with aphasia although preliminary findings suggest that benefits may exist across domains (health and disability).

This study aims to better understand how PA affects the lives of individuals with aphasia. Given weekly tele-instruction in PA over 10 weeks, participants' levels of PA will be monitored for the duration of the study. Pre- and post-treatment measures of cognitive ability, QoL, and aphasia severity will be collected and analyzed to characterize intervention effects. The results of this study will provide insight into whether PA may be an important component of future aphasia treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Hayward, California, United States, 94542-3000
        • California State University, East Bay

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of aphasia
  • Able to join exercise classes over Zoom

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Online aphasia-adapted physical activity class
Will receive the physical activity intervention.
Online 50-minute physical activity sessions, two to three times weekly for 10-11 weeks. The activity instructions will be modified to be aphasia-friendly (simplified language, multimodality support).
No Intervention: Usual routine control
Engage in physical activity per usual routine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence Rates
Time Frame: During intervention (weeks 1-10)
Percent of classes attended
During intervention (weeks 1-10)
Retention
Time Frame: Post-intervention (week 10)
Percent of participants completing the intervention
Post-intervention (week 10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' attitudes towards the intervention
Time Frame: Post-intervention (week 10)
Acceptability and themes as identified via qualitative interview
Post-intervention (week 10)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sedentary behaviors
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Change in sitting and sleeping time, as measured using activity monitor
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Physical Activity: Steps
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Change in steps per day, as measured using activity monitor
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Physical Activity: Standing
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Change in time spent standing, as measured using activity monitor
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Engagement
Time Frame: During intervention (weeks 1-10)
Change in heart rate during exercise class, as measured using activity monitor
During intervention (weeks 1-10)
Language ability
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Change in Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (minimum value:0, maximum value: 100, higher scores indicate a better outcome)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Quality of Life (perceived)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Change in Burden of Stroke Scale Total Transformed Score; minimum value 0; maximum value 100; higher scores indicate worse outcome
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Cognition
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)
Change in Test of Non-Verbal Intelligence Percentile Rank (minimum score: 0, maximum score 100, higher scores indicate a better outcome)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post intervention (week 10)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle 1 Gravier, Ph.D., California State University, East Bay

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data will be made available upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available at study conclusion and will be available for 7 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests received by the primary investigator or other investigator team members via email will be reviewed for reasonable use

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia, Acquired

Clinical Trials on Online aphasia-adapted physical activity class

Subscribe