GnRH Agonist for Luteal Phase Support.

August 1, 2022 updated by: Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Comparison of Pregnancy Rates After Luteal Phase Support With GnRH Agonist Versus Progesterone - a Prospective Randomized Study

Objective To assess the the efficacy of luteal support with GnRH agonist in patients undergoing IVF in antagonist-based hcg triggered cycles compared with standard luteal support with progesterone.

Design prospective randomized controled study Subjects Patients who underwent antagonist-based cycles performed in the "Shaare Zedek Medical Center" IVF clinic between 2020 and 2022 Intervention Intranasal GnRH-agonist or vaginal Progesterone for luteal support.

Main outcome measures Pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates, ohss.

The study cohort included 150 patients who underwent 164 cycles. A total of 127 cycles were included. Of them, 64 were treated with GnRH-a and 63 with progesterone.

Hypothesis: This RCT suggests that GnRH-a for luteal phase support is associated with a higher positive β-hCG pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate, compared with standard progesterone support in an antagonist-based protocol triggered with hCG, while maintaining a similar safety profile.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:Criteria for inclusion were patients aged between 18-45 years, BMI between 19-35, infertility diagnosis of male factor, tubal factor, anovulation, unexplained and age-related. Patients with or without infertility diagnosis, who underwent IVF for PGT were also included.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria were triggering with agents other than hCG, previous 3 or more failed cycles in which a good quality embryo or embryos were transferred, endometriosis, hydrosalpinx, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and Mullerian malformations. Drop-out criteria included no fresh embryo transfer, intolerance to GnRH-a, and nasal congestion during the luteal phase.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GnRH-agonist group
In the GnRH-a group, LPS was initiated on the evening after the OPU, using Nafareline (Synarel nasal spray 200mg used once), followed by twice daily (total 400mg/day) until the day of serum β-hCG pregnancy test, and then stopped, regardless of the test results
GnRH agonist alone for luteal phase support in fresh IVF embryo transfer cycles
Other Names:
  • Synarel
Active Comparator: Progesterone group
In the progesterone group, LPS was initiated on the morning after OPU, using micronized progesterone ( PV Utrogestan 300mg, 3 times daily), until serum β-hCG pregnancy tests results were available. If a β-hCG pregnancy was confirmed, LPS was continued until the end of the 8th gestational week
vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support
Other Names:
  • Utrogestan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pregnancy
Time Frame: 2 weeks
- positive Bhcg
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical pregnancy
Time Frame: 5 weeks
gestational sac with heartbeat
5 weeks
ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Time Frame: 5 weeks
early and late
5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Synarel fresh LPS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Use of GnRH Agonist Alone for Luteal Phase Support in Fresh IVF Cycles

Clinical Trials on GnRH agonist

Subscribe