- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05489822
PMCF Study to Evaluate the VERTICALE® Cervical System in Spine Surgery According to Its Intended Use.
Sponsor-initiated, Prospective, Single-center, Non-interventional Clinical Observational Study to Evaluate the VERTICALE® Cervical System in Spine Surgery According to Its Intended Use.
In accordance with the European Medical Device Regulation MDR 2017/745/EU, the legal manufacturers of medical devices are obliged to evaluate medical devices with regard to their clinical performance and safety.
The VERTICALE® Cervical System is intended for immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments of the craniocervical junction (occipital-C2), subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T3).
Primary Objective:
To assess the functional outcome and clinical benefit of the VERTICALE® Cervical System for the patient using the NDI (Neck Disability Index) questionnaire.
Primary endpoint hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that NDI improves by at least 10% or 5 points at 12 months FU (Follow-Up) compared with preoperatively.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In accordance with the European Medical Device Regulation MDR 2017/745/EU, the legal manufacturers of medical devices are obliged to evaluate medical devices with regard to their clinical performance and safety.
The VERTICALE® Cervical System is intended for immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments of the craniocervical junction (occipital-C2), subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T3).
The investigators interest is the continuous improvement of the surgical procedure in the context of degenerative cervical spine diseases. Patient satisfaction, as well as the avoidance of possible complications, are the main focus here. In addition, CE-certified medical devices must be evaluated for long-term performance and safety in clinical practice in accordance with the Medical Devices Act. The VERTICALE® Cervical System is a rod-screw system for immobilization (= immobilization) and stabilization of the affected segments, in the area between the occiput, the cervical spine and the upper thoracic spine (up to the 3rd thoracic vertebral body). Surgical intervention with the VERTICALE® Cervical System is performed from behind (posteriorly) and usually serves to stiffen the affected areas.
The goals of surgical intervention depend on the exact clinical picture and the associated symptoms, but usually consist of surgical relief of the affected structures of the nervous apparatus and/or spinal cord, stabilization of the bony structures to restore and/or maintain function, and relief of pain.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System - UI Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Ability to read, understand and speak the local language fluently to ensure understanding of Informed consent and protocol specific investigations
- The surgical indication must be one or a combination of the following
- Degenerative disc disease (DDD)
- Instabilities
- Trauma
- Deformities
- Mono-, bi- and multisegmental restoration (occipital T3)
- Age: ≥ 18 years
- The subject must give written informed consent before inclusion into the PMCF study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Relative and absolute contraindications according to IFU (Instruction for Use):
Under certain circumstances, implantation is prohibited or associated with substantial risks, even though there may be an indication for it.
These include in particular:
- Anticipated or documented allergy or intolerance to the materials (e.g., titanium or cobalt chromium).
- Active systemic infection or an infection localized to the site of the proposed implantation
- Any case in which the chosen implants would be too large or too small to achieve a successful result.
- Any patient for whom the use of the implant would conflict with anatomical structures.
- Missing bony structures, which would render solid anchoring of the implant impossible (e.g., in the case of fractures, tumors, or osteoporosis). In addition, the patient's occupation or activity level or mental capacity may be relative contraindications to this surgery. Specifically, patients who because of their occupation or lifestyle, drug abuse, may place undue stresses on the implant during bony healing and may be at higher risk for implant failure.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Neck Disability Index (NDI) preoperative (pre-op) compared to 3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
Time Frame: pre-op compared to 3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
The primary endpoint for this PMCF (Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up) study will be the PROM (Patient-reported Outcome Measurement) instrument Neck Disability Index (NDI).
This questionnaire is scientifically accepted.
[1] The aim is to show an improvement of the NDI in comparison pre-op to post-op (12 months follow-up (± 1 month)).
The reference for the primary endpoint NDI is a 2008 publication by Hovard Vernon, "The Neck Disability Index: State-of-the-Art, 1991-2008."
[1] This comparative overview is referenced several times in other publications and represents the SoTA.
|
pre-op compared to 3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Documentation of Complications
Time Frame: intra-op
|
Documentation of Complications if any occurred incl.
classification in relation to implant and manifestation
|
intra-op
|
|
Documentation of Complications
Time Frame: Hospital discharge
|
Documentation of Complications if any occurred incl.
classification in relation to implant and manifestation
|
Hospital discharge
|
|
Documentation of Complications
Time Frame: 3 month (± 1 month)
|
Documentation of Complications if any occurred incl.
classification in relation to implant and manifestation
|
3 month (± 1 month)
|
|
Documentation of Complications
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
Documentation of Complications if any occurred incl.
classification in relation to implant and manifestation
|
12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
|
Examination of clinical performance
Time Frame: pre-op
|
Evaluation by means of X-ray images and, if necessary, supplementary sectional imaging (CT or MRT)
|
pre-op
|
|
Examination of clinical performance
Time Frame: 3 month (± 1 month)
|
Evaluation by means of X-ray images and, if necessary, supplementary sectional imaging (CT or MRT)
|
3 month (± 1 month)
|
|
Examination of clinical performance
Time Frame: optional: 12 months follow-up (± 1 month))
|
Evaluation by means of X-ray images and, if necessary, supplementary sectional imaging (CT or MRT)
|
optional: 12 months follow-up (± 1 month))
|
|
Device effectiveness/patient satisfaction: Change of arm/shoulder pain using a Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: pre-op compared to post-op (3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month))
|
Documentation of change in pain measured with theNumerical Rating Scale for arm/shoulder pain (0 = no pain; 10 = Unbearable pain).
|
pre-op compared to post-op (3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month))
|
|
Device effectiveness/patient satisfaction: Change of neck pain using a Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: pre-op compared to post-op (3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month))
|
Documentation of change in pain measured with the Numerical Rating Scale for neck pain (0 = no pain; 10 = Unbearable pain).
|
pre-op compared to post-op (3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month))
|
|
Device effectiveness/patient satisfaction: modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score for the assessment of a possibly present myelopathy.
Time Frame: pre-op
|
Acquisition of the mJOA score for the assessment of a possibly present myelopathy.
(Range 0-18 Points; 18 points = no myelopathy; 15-17 points = mild myeolopathy; 12-14 points = moderate myelopathy; 0-11 Points = severe myelopathy;
|
pre-op
|
|
Device effectiveness/patient satisfaction: modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score for the assessment of a possibly present myelopathy.
Time Frame: 3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
Acquisition of the mJOA score for the assessment of a possibly present myelopathy.
(Range 0-18 Points; 18 points = no myelopathy; 15-17 points = mild myeolopathy; 12-14 points = moderate myelopathy; 0-11 Points = severe myelopathy;
|
3 month (± 1 month) and 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
|
Device effectiveness/patient satisfaction: modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score for the assessment of a possibly present myelopathy.
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
Acquisition of the mJOA score for the assessment of a possibly present myelopathy.
(Range 0-18 Points; 18 points = no myelopathy; 15-17 points = mild myeolopathy; 12-14 points = moderate myelopathy; 0-11 Points = severe myelopathy;
|
12 months follow-up (± 1 month)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ankit I. Mehta, MD, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System - UI Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.
- Kato S, Oshima Y, Oka H, Chikuda H, Takeshita Y, Miyoshi K, Kawamura N, Masuda K, Kunogi J, Okazaki R, Azuma S, Hara N, Tanaka S, Takeshita K. Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0123022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123022. eCollection 2015.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TDII_2014-003_2.1_103
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Trauma
-
Humacyte, Inc.CompletedTrauma | Trauma Injury | Trauma, Multiple | Trauma BluntUkraine
-
Arrowhead Regional Medical CenterCompletedTrauma Injury | Trauma Blunt | Vascular TraumaUnited States
-
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research...CompletedTrauma Injury | Trauma, MultipleTurkey
-
Wonju Severance Christian HospitalNational Research Foundation of KoreaCompletedTrauma Injury | Trauma, MultipleKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruiting
-
Rabin Medical CenterIsraeli Ministry of SecurityUnknown
-
Hospital Departamental de VillavicencioCooperative University of Colombia; Clínica PrimaveraRecruitingTrauma Injury | Trauma Patients in ICU | Trauma (Including Fractures) | Trauma Patients | Trauma ICU PatientsColombia
-
Oslo University HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital; South-Eastern Norway Regional...RecruitingTrauma Injury | Trauma, Multiple | PolytraumaNorway
-
Chang, Steve S., M.D.Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital; Accumetrics, Inc.CompletedHead Injury Trauma BluntUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisURC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin; Francophone Pediatric Resuscitation...Completed
Clinical Trials on VERTICALE® Cervical System
-
Metrosan End. ve Elk. Mek. Cihazlar ve Tibbi Malz...Bonegraft Biyolojik Malzemeler San. ve Tic. A.S.RecruitingSpinal Stenosis | Vertebral Fractures | Spondylolisthesis | Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) | Spinal Tumors | Spinal Trauma | Spinal Deformities | Spinal InfectionsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsCompleted
-
Aesculap AGRecruitingPain, Postoperative | Cervical Spine DiseaseGermany
-
Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsCompletedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Bio2 TechnologiesMCRATerminatedSymptomatic Cervical Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Centinel SpineNot yet recruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease | Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis | Retrolisthesis
-
NGMedical GmbHRecruitingRadiculopathy | Stenoses, Spinal | Discopathy | Herniated Cervical DiscAustria, Germany
-
University Hospital, BordeauxMinistry for Health and Solidarity, FranceCompletedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseFrance
-
Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsCompletedDegenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Providence Medical Technology, Inc.WithdrawnCervical RadiculopathyUnited States