Personalized Parkinson Project PSP Cohort (PPP-PSP)

March 20, 2025 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center
There is an urgent need for the development of digital progression biomarkers, which are sensitive to detect small, but potentially clinically relevant changes in the disease course. Digital biomarkers are based on (i) continuously collected real-time data, during the patient's day to day activities; and (ii) task-based assessment. In this study the investigators are interested in developing algorithms for the detection of disease progression in PSP patients in key clinical parameters: bradykinesia, gait, rising from a chair and falls, based on (i) sensor data obtained by means of passive monitoring during daily living; and (ii) sensor data collected during the Virtual Motor Exam.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale In light of the advent of a wide range of new disease modifying treatments, and acknowledging that existing clinical outcome measures may well be insufficiently sensitive to detecting small but potentially clinically relevant changes in the disease course, there is an urgent need for development of digital progression biomarkers, not only in the field of Parkinson's disease, but also in the field of the various forms of atypical parkinsonism, including Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP).

Study Design Prospective, longitudinal, single-center cohort study.

Study Objectives The primary objective is to develop algorithms for the detection of disease progression in PSP patients in key clinical parameters: bradykinesia, gait, rising from a chair and falls, based on (1) sensor data obtained by means of passive monitoring during daily living; and (2) sensor data collected during the Virtual Motor Exam.

The second objective of this study is to create a longitudinal dataset describing the clinical and functional characteristics of a representative PSP cohort to allow researchers to investigate important unanswered questions in PSP.

Study population 50 patients with possible or probable PSP, according to established international criteria (i.e., MDS-PSP criteria); diagnosis confirmed by consensus review of a videotaped neurological examination by two neurologists with deep expertise in movement disorders. In addition, we will include 50 age and gender matched healthy controls.

Main study parameters/endpoints The primary study endpoints are the annual changes in the newly developed digital measurements, extracted from the Verily Study Watch. Secondary endpoints include standardized evaluations for motor, cognition, neuropsychological, quality of life and ADL assessments. Additionally, whole blood for DNA and serum will be collected in the PSP subjects, to use for e.g. genotyping and phenotyping.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness For data collection, the study assessor will visit each participant at home twice within an interval of 1 year ± 60 days. All study assessments are routine exams done in standard clinical practice and are generally well tolerated, which takes up to 2 hours each time. PSP subjects will also be asked to consent to a blood draw once. During their 1-year participation, each participant will wear the Verily Study Watch daily for up to 23 hours. This small, unobtrusive electronic device is easily worn and poses no significant safety risk. All participants will be asked to complete a set scheduled tasks twice a day, once a week, which altogether takes 15-20 minutes of their time.

As data collection is not performed for immediate diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, there will be no direct benefits for the subjects enrolled in this study. Patients may indirectly benefit from the study, as their data contribute to providing novel etiological insights for improving the use of existing treatments, developing of new therapeutic approaches, and increasing the precision of personalized disease management.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

PSP-cohort: any adult with PSP who meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet the exclusion criteria.

HC-cohort: any adult who meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet the exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria (PSP cohort):

  • Subject has possible or probable PSP, according to the established international criteria defined by the Movement Disorders Society (MDS-PSP criteria, Höglinger et al, 2017); diagnosis is confirmed based on by consensus review process. In addition to the diagnosis of the own treating neurologist, the diagnosis always needs to be confirmed by at least one neurologist with deep expertise in movement disorders. The videotaped neurological examination as obtained during visit 1 will be used by the expert neurologist.
  • Subject is an adult, at least 50 years of age.
  • Subject can read and understand Dutch.
  • Subject has completed the Informed Consent, as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
  • Subject is willing, competent, and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol.
  • Subject is able to walk at least 5 steps with or without minimal assistance (ie, stabilization of 1 arm or use of a cane or walker).

Inclusion Criteria (HC cohort):

  • Subject has no neurological or musculoskeletal disorder or any other condition that impairs movement, gait, or balance, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Subject is an adult, at least 50 years of age.
  • Subject can read and understand Dutch.
  • Subject has completed the Informed Consent, as approved by the IRB.
  • Subject is willing, competent, and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol.
  • Subject is able to walk at least 5 steps with or without minimal assistance (i.e., stabilization of 1 arm or use of a cane or walker).

Exclusion Criteria (PSP and HC cohorts):

  • Subject has an additional condition or situation that, in the opinion of the Investigator, makes the subject inappropriate for participation in the study.
  • For Study Watch: subject is allergic to nickel.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
Participants with possible or probable PSP, wearing the Verily Study Watch for 1 year.
The Verily Study Watch is a smartwatch, collecting physiological and/or environmental information. The sensors collect data that include movement and activity, pulse rate, skin impedance, electrocardiogram (ECG), environmental temperature, and ambient light level.
Healthy Controls (HC)
Participants without a neurological condition, age and gender matched to the PSP cohort, , wearing the Verily Study Watch for 1 year.
The Verily Study Watch is a smartwatch, collecting physiological and/or environmental information. The sensors collect data that include movement and activity, pulse rate, skin impedance, electrocardiogram (ECG), environmental temperature, and ambient light level.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annual change in digital biomarkers for gait
Time Frame: From baseline till one year follow-up
Identify (a combined set of) gait-related features extracted from wearable sensor data, that are relevant for patients and that are sensitive to disease progression in PSP patients. Which outcome and which Unit of Measure for gait will be selected cannot be defined on forehand, as this is part of the analytical approach.
From baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in digital biomarkers for bradykinesia
Time Frame: From baseline till one year follow-up
Identify (a combined set of) bradykinesia-related features extracted from wearable sensor data, that are relevant for patients and that are sensitive to disease progression in PSP patients. Which outcome and which Unit of Measure for bradykinesia will be selected cannot be defined on forehand, as this is part of the analytical approach.
From baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in digital biomarkers for falls
Time Frame: From baseline till one year follow-up
Identify (a combined set of) falls-related features extracted from wearable sensor data, that are relevant for patients and that are sensitive to disease progression in PSP patients. Which outcome and which Unit of Measure for falls will be selected cannot be defined on forehand, as this is part of the analytical approach.
From baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in digital biomarkers for rising from a chair
Time Frame: From baseline till one year follow-up
Identify (a combined set of) features related to rising from a chair extracted from wearable sensor data, that are relevant for patients and that are sensitive to disease progression in PSP patients. Which outcome and which Unit of Measure for rising from a chair will be selected cannot be defined on forehand, as this is part of the analytical approach.
From baseline till one year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annual change in digital biomarker for motor performance
Time Frame: Baseline till one year follow-up
Standardized evaluation, by means of 8 tasks, included in the Virtual Motor Examination. Which outcome and which Unit of Measure for motor performance will be selected cannot be defined on forehand, as this is part of the analytical approach.
Baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in cognition
Time Frame: Baseline till one year follow-up
Cognition will be assessed by means of the Mini-Mental State Examination version 2 (MMSE-2), on a 0-30-point scale.
Baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline till one year follow-up

Quality of life is captured by means of a general scale, i.e., EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 parts: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.

Baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) performance
Time Frame: Baseline till one year follow-up
Modified Schwab & England Activities of Daily Living is a method of assessing the capabilities of people with impaired mobility. The scale uses percentages to represent how much effort and dependence on others people need to complete daily chores.
Baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in D-KEFS trail making test
Time Frame: Baseline till one year follow-up
D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) trail making test is a neuropsychological test for executive functioning, with scores in seconds to perform the task.
Baseline till one year follow-up
Annual change in semantic fluency
Time Frame: Baseline till one year follow-up
The semantic fluency test is a neuropsychological assessment, measuring executive function and semantic memory. The score entails the number of correct and unique words produced within a 60 seconds timeframe.
Baseline till one year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bastiaan R Bloem, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The dataset generated in this study will become available to qualified researchers worldwide, provided research questions are approved by the Research and Data Sharing Review Committee (RDSRC). The RDSRC will protect subjects' privacy by limiting the availability of the study data and controlling access to sources of information that might potentially be used to identify the individual subjects associated with the bio-specimen analysis. The RDSRC will assess the relevance and scientific quality of research proposals for which study data or material is requested. These responsibilities include the consideration of applications for:

  • access to the resources obtained in this study, including data or biomaterials
  • applications for endorsement of a scientific project using study materials;
  • applications for endorsement of a clinical study using study materials.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Not decided yet.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

No list of criteria is available yet.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Diseases

Clinical Trials on Verily Study Watch

Subscribe