PENG vs FICB for Hip Fracture in ED Patients

June 1, 2026 updated by: Matthew Kongkatong, MD, University of Virginia

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip Fracture Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients

Regional anesthesia for hip fractures has been shown to decrease rates of delirium in elderly patients with hip fractures as well as improve pain compared to systemic opioids. The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block has recently received attention as an alternative approach to femoral nerve block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB). The investigators seek to evaluate if there is a difference between the PENG and FICB in terms of efficacy of pain control in ED patients presenting with hip fracture. We hypothesize that the PENG block may be superior based on previous research.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Fractures of the proximal femur are a common presentation to the emergency department and are an acutely painful condition. This condition predominantly affects elderly patients who are at risk for delirium and more susceptible to the adverse effects of systemic opioids. Regional anesthesia is an recommended component of pain control for elderly patients with hip fracture. The investigators seek to compare the efficacy of pain control of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block with the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB).

Previous studies have suggested that the PENG block may be superior to the FICB for pain control and results in less thigh motor weakness. The investigators will compare pain control (by difference in mean VAS score at set time points), systemic opioid use (in mean morphine equivalents prior to surgery), and motor function in patients with hip fractures who receive either block in the ED.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Proximal femur fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to consent
  • hemodynamic instability
  • allergy to local anesthetics
  • severe injury with instability
  • severe medical conditions with instability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PENG
Patients with hip fracture randomized to receive PENG block
patients will receive an ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (not to exceed 2mg/kg)
Active Comparator: FICB
Patients with hip fracture randomized to received FICB
Patients will receive an ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (not to exceed 2 mg/kg) diluted to total volume of 40 mL of injectate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: 6 hours
Median pain score on 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid use
Time Frame: From block administration until time of surgery or 24 hours if surgery performed >24 hours
Mean opioid consumption in morphine equivalents
From block administration until time of surgery or 24 hours if surgery performed >24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoral Neck Fractures

Clinical Trials on PENG

Subscribe