"Lumbar Operatively Inserted PerQdisc Artificial Implant Following Nulcectomy" (LOPAIN2) (LOPAIN2)

May 25, 2026 updated by: Spinal Stabilization Technologies
This study will be a prospective, open-label, multi-center study including 72 patients that will collect additional safety and efficacy data for the Spinal Stabilization Technologies PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement System.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be a prospective, open-label, multi-center study that will collect additional safety and efficacy data for the minimally invasive PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement Device (NRD). Patients will have degenerative disc disease (DDD) in one or more lumbar discs. The NRD is used for surgical replacement of a single nucleus pulposus between spinal lumbar discs L1-S1 using any standard anterior, standard lateral, or minimally invasive posterolateral surgical approach. Currently the surgical gold standard involves spinal fusion of the affected vertebral bodies, reducing range of motion and increasing stress on other vertebral bodies. The goal of nucleus replacement is to reduce chronic low back pain by maintaining disc height while preserving range of motion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Antioquia
      • Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
        • Active, not recruiting
        • CIGE: Centro de Imunologia y Genetica
      • Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Fundación Hospitalaria San Vicente de Paul
    • Atlántico
      • Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Cediul S.A.
      • Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia
        • Withdrawn
        • Fundación Campbell
      • Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia
        • Withdrawn
        • Sabbag Radiólogos S.A.
    • D.C.
      • Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Sociedad de Cirugia de Bogota- Hospital de San Jose
    • Valle del Cauca Department
      • Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Clínica Imbanaco de Cali S.A.
    • Provincia de Panamá
      • Panama City, Provincia de Panamá, Panama
        • Recruiting
        • Pacífica Salud Hospital Punta Pacífica
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Ricardo Bermudez, MD
        • Contact:
      • Asunción, Paraguay, 1101
        • Recruiting
        • Sanatario Americano
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Francisco Duarte, MD
      • Tashkent, Uzbekistan
        • Recruiting
        • Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Center of Endocrinology named after Academician Y.Kh. Turakulova
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Abdufarrukh Karimov

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is skeletally mature aged 22-70.
  • Patient has Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or more levels between L1 and S1 but the discogenic pain must be limited to a single level.
  • Patient has adequate disc height (6mm) at the level to be treated
  • Patient has exhausted a minimum of 6 months of conservative treatment for their back (e.g. physical therapy, medications, injections, life style changes, etc).
  • Patient has a preoperative Oswestry Disability questionnaire score ≥ 40 out of 100 points (40/100)
  • Patient has a low back pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≥ 40 mm (4 cm)
  • Patient has signed the approved Informed Consent Form.
  • All surgeries must be approved by the Medical Advisory Board (MAB)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has less than 6 mm of disc height.
  • Patient has had prior lumbar spine surgery (nucleoplasty at non-index level is considered acceptable).
  • Patient has had spinal fusion in the lumbar or thoracic intervertebral spaces. Cervical fusion is allowed as long as there are no neurologic deficits in the lower extremities.
  • Patient has spondyloarthropathy or other spondylolisthesis greater than 2 mm.
  • Patient has congenital moderate or severe spinal stenosis or epidural lipomatosis.
  • Patient has significant facet disease. Significant is defined as pain improvement of 80% or more following image-guided medial branch blocks of the target level according to SIS guidelines (diagnostic, contrast controlled).
  • Patient has any known active malignancy.
  • Patient has previously undergone or currently on immunosuppressive therapy. Steroids used to treat inflammation are allowed.
  • Patient has active or local systemic infection.
  • Patient has been diagnosed with hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, or other autoimmune disease including AIDS, ARC and HIV.
  • Patient has diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or 2) requiring daily insulin management.
  • Patient has osteopenia of the spine (T-score of -1.0 or lower). A DEXA scan should be performed to rule out patients considered at risk for osteopenia.
  • Patient has morbid obesity defined as a body mass index (BMI) more than 40 or a weight of more than 45 kg (100 lbs.) over ideal body weight.
  • Patient has a known allergy to silicone or barium sulfate.
  • Patient has a significant disc herniation at the level to be treated. Significant is defined as a large, extruded herniation that creates a risk for expulsion.
  • Patient has a significant Schmorl's node in the level to be treated. Significant is defined as a large, rectangular or irregular shaped node that has an associated active inflammatory process (Modic I changes).
  • Patient has motion of less than 3 degrees on pre-operative lateral flexion/extension radiographs.
  • Patient belongs to a vulnerable population or has a condition such that his/her ability to provide informed consent, comply with follow-up requirements, or provide self-assessments is compromised (e.g. developmentally, disabled, prisoner, chronic alcohol/ substance abuser)

Intraoperative Exclusion Criteria:

  • Protrusion of the 20A Imaging Balloon up to or beyond the outer margin of the vertebra during the imaging steps.
  • Patient has a violated endplate as determined by imaging balloons during fluoroscopy.
  • Patient has a disc space that is too narrow for implantation. MIPL Specific
  • Poor radiological visualization of Kambin's triangle.
  • Sustained irritation of the exiting nerve root during any aspect of the annular dilation technique (leg movement or if performing with electrical monitoring) in spite or repositioning instruments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lumbar Disc Nucleus Replacement
All patients meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria will be considered for nucleus replacement surgery following a review by the Medical Advisory Board.
Lumbar spine disc nucleus replacement system. All patients meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria will be considered for nucleus replacement surgery following a review by the Medical Advisory Board.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perfromance: ODI
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) comparing baseline to follow up visits using a patient-reported outcome tool
6 months
Perfromance: ODI
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) comparing baseline to follow up visits using a patient-reported outcome tool
12 months
Performance: VAS
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in back pain as measured by the 100 - millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
6 months
Performance: VAS
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in back pain as measured by the 100 - millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
12 months
Safety: Expulsion & Device Failure
Time Frame: 6 months
Incidence of device expulsion and device failure following surgery based on follow up X-rays and MRI's
6 months
Safety: Expulsion & Device Failure
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of device expulsion and device failure following surgery based on follow up X-rays and MRI's
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety: Revision Surgery
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Incidence of revision surgery
6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Safety: Expulsion & Device Failure
Time Frame: 5 years
Incidence of device expulsion and device failure following surgery based on follow up X-rays and MRI's
5 years
Performance: Disc Height
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Preservation of intervertebral disc height (in mm) as measured on MRI post-surgery compared to baseline
6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Performance: RoM
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Preservation of range of movement (expressed in degrees) at the index and adjacent levels at baseline compared to follow-up using flexion/extension radiographs
6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Safety: Neurological Status
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Maintenance of baseline neurologic status through physical assessment evaluating nerve compression at baseline and post-surgical follow-up using pain, motor strength, and sensation feedback from the patient on a 0 (no compression) to 5 (major compression) scale
6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Performance: Analgesic Score
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Change in level of pain medication used comparing baseline to follow up visits based on a medication scale ranging from 0 (no meds) - 4 (high dose opioids)
6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Safety: SAE
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years
Incidence of serious adverse events that are related to the surgical procedure or Incidence of Serious Adverse Events related to the surgical procedure or device
6 months, 12 months, and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Michael Hess, MD, London Spine Clinic/ATOS-Klinik

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 22, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 22, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement System

Subscribe