Safety Study for An Artificial Disc Replacement to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain

July 13, 2021 updated by: Spinal Stabilization Technologies

Safety Study for An Artificial Disc Replacement "PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement Device" NUCLEUS 181

This study will be a prospective, open-label, multi-center study that will collect safety data for the minimally invasive PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement Device deployed to reduce chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

This study will be a prospective, open-label, multi-center study that will collect safety data for the minimally invasive PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement Device (NRD). The NRD is used for surgical replacement of a single nucleus pulposus between spinal lumbar discs L1-S1 using an anterior or lateral transpsoas approach. Currently the surgical gold standard involves spinal fusion of the affected vertebral bodies, reducing range of motion and increasing stress on other vertebral bodies. The goal of nucleus replacement is to reduce chronic low back pain by maintaining disc height while preserving range of motion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalst, Belgium
        • Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4
        • Montreal General Hospital
      • Zagreb, Croatia
        • Clinical Hospital Dubrava
      • Deggendorf, Germany, 94469
        • Donauisar Klinikum Deggendorf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is skeletally mature and between 22 and 60 years of age.
  • Patient has degenerative disc disease (DDD) at a single level between L1 and S1 as confirmed by:History and clinical findings suggestive of symptomatic DDD, Darkened disc on MRI in T2 weighted images, and decreased disc height (decreased greater than 2 mm compared to adjacent cranial or caudal disc height) with minimum disc height of 6 mm.
  • Patient has pre-operative back pain VAS score of greater than or equal to 4 (0-10 scale).
  • Patient has pre-operative Oswestry Low Back Disability score of greater than or equal to 40 (0-100 scale).
  • Patient has received conservative (non-surgical) treatment for back pain for a minimum of 6 months.
  • Patient has signed the approved Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has had prior lumbar spine surgery.
  • Patient has motion of less than 3 degrees on pre-operative lateral flexion/extension radiographs.
  • Patient has ankylosing spondylitis or other spondyloarthropathy.
  • Patient has isthmic spondylolisthesis or degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than 2 mm.
  • Patient has congenital stenosis or epidural lipomatosis.
  • Patient has significant facet disease.
  • Patient has any known active malignancy.
  • Patient has previously undergone immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Patient has active local or system infection.
  • Patient has been diagnosed with hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, or other autoimmune disease, including AIDS, ARC and HIV
  • Patient has diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or 2), requiring daily insulin management.
  • Patient has osteopenia of the spine (T-score less than 1.0). All females 45 years of age or older and all males 50 or older should have a DEXA scan to confirm this exclusion.
  • Patient has morbid obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) more than 40 or a weight of more than 45 kg (100 lbs) over ideal body weight.
  • Patient is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  • Patient has a known allergy to silicone (polymer and balloon material) or barium sulfate (polymer).
  • Patient participated in another investigational drug or device study within the past 30 days.
  • Patient belongs to a vulnerable population or has a condition such that his/her ability to provide informed consent, comply with follow-up requirements, or provide self assessments is compromised (e.g. developmentally disables, prisoner, chronic alcohol/ substance abuser)
  • Patient has a disc herniation
  • Patient has a Schmorl's node in the level to be treated

Intraoperative exclusion criteria:

  • Protrusion of the 20A imaging balloon up to or beyond the outer margin of the vertebra during the imaging steps.
  • Patient has a violated endplate.
  • Patient has a disc space that is too narrow.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nucleus Replacement
All patients that meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will receive the PerQdisc® Nucleus Replacement Device.
All patients that meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will receive the PerQdisc® Nucleus Replacement Device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of revision surgery at the treated level
Time Frame: 90 days
Number of patients requiring surgeries to revise the implanted level in the spine divided by the total number of implant surgeries. Express in percentage (0-100)
90 days
Rate of expulsion
Time Frame: 90 Days
The rate of device expulsion. The number of patients determined to have expulsed devices divided by the total number of patients receiving implants.Expressed in percentage (0-100)
90 Days
Rate of new herniation at the treated level as determined by MRI
Time Frame: 90 days
Herniation will be determine by MRI. A herniation will be defined as violation of the intervertebral annulus, including expulsion of nucleus material. The response will be yes/no as assessed by the radiologist. Rate will be determined by total number of herniations divided by the total number of implanted devices. Expressed in percentage (0-100)
90 days
Rate of new radiculopathy
Time Frame: 90 days
New complaint of leg pain will be recorded as a yes/no response. Any complaint of new radiculopathy not seen preoperatively. Expressed as total number of new radiculopathy complaints divided by total number of patients. Expressed in percentage (0-100)
90 days
MRI assessment of the endplate Modic changes.
Time Frame: 90 days
Changes to vertebral endplates will be assigned based on Modic classification of I,II or III comparing preoperative grade to grade at 90 days. Possible scores are I,II or III
90 days
Rate of surgical procedure technical success
Time Frame: 90 days
The number of devices successfully implanted divided by the number of successfully devices implanted + unsuccessful implants. Output will be in percentage (0-100)
90 days
Improvement in degree of disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in absolute Oswestry Index score at 90 days compared to the preoperative score, range is 0-100
90 days
Improvement in back pain as measured by 10-centimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain on a scale of 0-10 cm comparing preoperative scores to 90 days post-operative.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on PerQdisc® Nucleus Replacement Device.

3
Subscribe