The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (DSA-RCT-1)

March 5, 2025 updated by: Hannah Raab, Erasmus Medical Center

The Influence of Electroencephalographic Density Spectral Array Guidance of Sevoflurane Administration on Recovery From General Anaesthesia in Children Between 6 Months and 12 Years.

In this randomised, blinded study, we will investigate the influence of DSA on recovery from general anaesthesia. DSA monitoring provides continuous information on depth of hypnosis. Based on DSA monitoring dose adjustments of sevoflurane can be made. We expect that this will lead to a faster speed of emergence and recovery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Electroencephalographic density spectral array (DSA) is a three dimensional method to display electroencephalogram (EEG) signals consisting of the EEG frequency (y-axis), the power of the EEG signal (colour-coded to be integrated into a two dimensional plot) and the development of the EEG power spectrum over time (x-axis). DSA is routinely used to measure depth of hypnosis (DoH) by a part of the staff members in our department. When DSA is used, dose adjustments of sevoflurane will be made based on monitoring depth of anaesthesia. However, most of our colleague do not use DSA. Dose adjustment is then based on (subjective) clinical surrogate parameters, or in general mostly based on a minimal alveolar concentration of the anaesthetic gas that is used.

Electroencephalographic DSA monitoring provides continuous objective information on DoH and should result in a faster speed of emergence and recovery from general anaesthesia (GA). This will be addressed in a randomised controlled trial.

In patients randomised to the intervention group, the anaesthetic agent sevoflurane will be administered on the basis of objective measures of anaesthetic depth, the typical DSA pattern for GA. We expect a significantly faster speed of emergence and recovery in the intervention group based on clinical experience. The Narcotrend monitor is validated for use in paediatric patients. There are thus no additional risk factors apart from those, which are inherent with general anaesthesia. Patient randomised to the control group will receive standard treatment, that is delivery of sevoflurane based on a MAC of 0.9 respectively an end tidal sevoflurane concentration of 2.3%. A non-invasive therapeutical intervention (DSA based conduct of GA) should result in the advantage of faster recovery, without any additional risk factor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3015GD
        • Erasmus Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent of parents/guardians
  • Age ≥6 months and ≤12 years
  • Surgical procedure requiring GA supplemented with caudal analgesia
  • Ability of the parents/guardians to communicate in Dutch

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary exclusion criteria
  • Withdrawal of informed consent
  • (Chronic) use of drugs influencing the electroencephalogram
  • Use of premedication
  • Known intolerance for sevoflurane
  • Parents/guardians unable to communicate in Dutch
  • Secondary exclusion criteria
  • Protocol violation
  • Data registration failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
In patients randomised to the control group, sevoflurane will be titrated according to a Minimal Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 0.9 respectively an end tidal sevoflurane concentration of 2.3% based on standard practice in our paediatric anaesthesia department.
Experimental: Treatment
In patients randomised to the intervention group of the trial, the anaesthetic agent sevoflurane will be titrated according to the typical DSA pattern for general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, provided by the Narcotrend

This trial is designed to investigate the additional value of Density Spectral Array monitoring, on the "speed of emergence" after general anaesthesia. We will compare traditional general anaesthesia with sevoflurane using a MAC value and subjective clinical parameters to the objective and continuous approach using DSA depth of hypnosis. The investigational product is the validated Narcotrend monitor, an electroencephalographic monitor, that is regularly used in anaesthesia practice in the Sophia children's hospital and will be used according to intended purpose. The extended version as used in the operating room in the Sophia Children's hospital offers a diversity of diagrams including Density Spectral Array.

The electroencephalographic Narcotrend monitor records frontal EEG-activity. Standard paediatric ECG electrodes are used for EEG registration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Influence of DSA Monitoring on the Speed of Emergence.
Time Frame: Day 0

The speed of emergence is defined as the time interval between the end of hypnotic drug application and the moment when discharge criteria from the operating room are met (defined as a Steward score ≥ 3)

The Steward recovery score consists of three domains: consciousness, airway and motor. Consciousness can be scored from 0-2, in which 0 equals non responsive, 1 equals response to stimuli, 2 equals awake. Airway is scored from 0-2: airway that requires maintenance scores 0, maintaining good airway scores 1 and coughing on command or crying scores 2. Motor is also scored form 0-2: no movement scores 0, non-purposeful movement scores 1 and purposeful movement scores 2. Combining all three domains, the minimum score is 0 (unconscious) and the maximum score is 6 (completely awake) The speed of emergence is defined as a minimum score of 3, with a minimum score of 1 in each domain.

Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Time From Discontinuation of Anaesthetic Drug Delivery Until Discharge From the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit.
Time Frame: Day 0

The total time is defined as the time interval between the end of hypnotic drug application and the moment when discharge criteria from the recovery room are met (defined as a Steward score =6)

The Steward recovery score consists of three domains: consciousness, airway and motor. Consciousness can be scored from 0-2, in which 0 equals non responsive, 1 equals response to stimuli, 2 equals awake. Airway is scored from 0-2: airway that requires maintenance scores 0, maintaining good airway scores 1 and coughing on command or crying scores 2. Motor is also scored form 0-2: no movement scores 0, non-purposeful movement scores 1 and purposeful movement scores 2. Combining all three domains, the minimum score is 0 (unconscious) and the maximum score is 6 (completely awake).

Day 0
The Incidence of Postoperative Delirium
Time Frame: Day 0

The incidence of postoperative delirium is assessed with the Cornell assessment of postoperative delirium (is defined as a score equal to or greater than 9).

The Cornell assessment of postoperative delirium consists of eight questions. The first four questions are scored as follows: 0 equals always, 1 often, 2 sometimes, 3 rarely, 4 never.

  1. Does the child make eye contact with the caregiver?
  2. Are the child's actions purposeful?
  3. Is the child aware of his/her surroundings?
  4. Does the child communicatie needs and wants? In these first four questions, a higher score represents a worse outcome.

    The last four questions are scored as follows: 0 equals never, 1 rarely, 2 sometimes, 3 often and 4 always.

  5. Is the child restless?
  6. Is the child inconsolable?
  7. Is the child underactive - very little movement while awake?
  8. Does it take the child a long time to respond to interactions? In these last four questions, a higher score represents a worse outcome.
Day 0
Differences of Depth of Hypnosis During the Procedure, as Measured by the Narcotrend Monitor.
Time Frame: Day 0
Density spectral array patterns will be saved, and divided into categories, which will be compared between the two study groups.
Day 0
Incidence of Recall of Events During the Procedure (Awareness)
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 1, Day 14
Awareness is assessed with a modified Brice interview in children of 6 years or older.
Day 0, Day 1, Day 14
The End-tidal Sevoflurane Concentration
Time Frame: Day 0
The mean end-tidal sevoflurane concentration measured during surgical procedure
Day 0

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frank Weber, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DSA-RCT-1
  • NL80282.078.22 (Other Identifier: CCMO)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data of a patient will only be shared with other fellow researchers (e.g. in case of follow-up studies) upon reasonable request, on the condition that the child's parent explicitly consented.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available after data collection has been completed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Reasonable request of fellow researches and only data of patients after explicit consent from parents on the ICF.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe