PROMs and Patellar Tracking After MPFL Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tuberosity Transposition

Difference in Patient Reported Outcomes and Patellar Tracking Before and After MPFL Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tuberosity Transposition

Patellar dislocations cause pain and functional decline in adolescents, which can be restored by a MPFL reconstruction with or without tibial tuberosity transposition. Yet, many reconstruction methods are being used clinically as consensus on the ideal MPFL reconstruction method is lacking. We propose a soft-tissue loop reconstruction method which potentially decreases the risk for of iatrogenic fracture of the patella and prevents femoral tunnel malposition.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Maltracking; Patellar Dislocation, Recurrent

Detailed Description

Rationale: A patellar dislocation is one of the most common acute knee disorders in children and adolescents, causing pain and functional decline. In order to restore healthy kinematics and relieve pain, patients can receive a MPFL reconstruction. Still, there is no consensus on the ideal MPFL reconstruction method. Within the Radboudumc, a dynamic soft-tissue loop method is used for MPFL reconstruction. The method minimizes the risk of iatrogenic fracture of the patella and prevents nonanatomic tracking due to femoral tunnel malposition. Yet, the technique has not been evaluated clinically.

Objective: Evaluate pre- and postoperative reported outcomes in patients receiving an soft tissue loop MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of patellar instability. Additionally, it is aimed to investigate the difference in patella tracking before and ~12 months after surgery measured with 4D CT imaging in patients receiving an MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT for the treatment of patellar instability.

Study design: Prospective single centre observational study.

Study population: 20 patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability who have received or will receive an soft-tissue loop MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT within the Radboudumc.

Main study parameters/endpoints: the main study parameter is the pre- and postoperative difference in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The secondary aim is to assess changes in patellar tracking (measured before and 12 months (to ~ 24 months) after surgery).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will undergo a 4D CT scan of their knees after their surgery. Whenever possible, the CT scans will be planned during the regular 12 month check-up appointment day so patients do not have to come separately to the Radboudumc for the CT scan. When the operation was > 12 months ago and patients do have to come to the Radboudumc for the CT scan they will be compensated for their travel expenses with a bol.com gift card of 100 euros. The preoperative 4D CT scan and PROMS that will be used in this study are part of standard care. CT scanning exposes patients to radiation. For this study the level of radiation is estimated as an intermediate level of risk. No additional risks are associated with this study. Potential burdens for patients are predominantly time (for which they will be compensated with a gift card of 100 euros in case they have to come to the Radboudumc for the scan) and additional radiation exposure. No direct personal health benefit is expected. However, the knowledge generated with this study is expected to benefit future patients who need to undergo a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 11

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Netherlands
  • Gelderland
    • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GA
      • Radboudumc

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients 16 years and older with recurrent patellofemoral instability who received a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age of 16 years and older.

• Recurrent patellofemoral instability, for which:

  1. the patient will receive a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT, or
  2. the patient has received a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT , on the condition that the patient has a usable preoperative 4D CT scan.
• Informed consent of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients below an age of 16 years.
• Patients that are pregnant.
• BMI > 35
• Patients that are unable to actively flex and extend their knee.
• Patellar stabilizing surgery other than the usual MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT. This includes: trochleoplasty, static MPFL reconstruction, isolated TTT

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in patient-reported outcomes.	Pre- and postoperative difference in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)	6 weeks preoperative to 12 months postoperative
Change in patient-reported outcomes	Pre- and postoperative difference in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)	6 weeks preoperative to 6 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Difference in patellar tracking.	Difference between preoperative and 12-24 months postoperative in patellar tracking. This will be measured with 4D CT imaging and quantified by the patellar tilt and shift. The preoperative 4D CT scan is part of standard care.	preoperative, 12-~24 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 17, 2023
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 20, 2025
• Study Completion (Actual): May 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 12, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 16, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): September 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 6, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 5, 2025
• Last Verified: May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: MPFL reconstruction; 4DCT; Patellofemoral instability
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Musculoskeletal Diseases; Wounds and Injuries; Joint Diseases; Leg Injuries; Knee Injuries; Joint Dislocations; Patellar Dislocation
• Other Study ID Numbers: 4DCT-PROMs-MPFLr

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No