Comparison of Results Achieved by Different Ballooning Techniques in Bifurcation Stenting (CRABBIS)

October 16, 2022 updated by: Francesco Burzotta, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Head-to-head Comparison of Stent Geometry Obtained by Different Ballooning Techniques in Large Bifurcations Treated by Provisional Stenting

Single-stent strategy with provisional approach represents the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions, and, according to European Bifurcation Club, performing provisional approach presents two steps considered as mandatory: "crossover stenting" in main vessel (MV) and subsequent post-dilation or "POT" (proximal optimization technique). While consensus exists regarding these first two steps, the exact optimal following sequence in case of side branch (SB) jeopardize after main vessel stenting is still a matter of debate.

Actually, the two most used techniques in this setting are represented by the simultaneous inflation of two balloons located respectively in the MV and SB followed by a second POT (POT/kissing balloon/POT technique) and the isolated inflation of a balloon placed in the SB followed by a second POT (POT/SIDE/POT technique).

The objective of this study is to compare the configuration achieved with POT/KISS/POT (PKP) and POT/SIDE/POT (PSP), using the "cutting edge" high-resolution intracoronary imaging modality (Optical Coherence Tomography, OCT).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A preclinical phase of the study (CRABBS-VHL) was performed in isolated porcine hearts comparing the two common side-branch (SB) optimization techniques after stent implantation in the main vessel (MV): proximal optimization technique (POT) + kissing balloon inflation + final POT (PKP arm) and POT + isolated balloon inflation + final POT (PSP arm).

A total of 30 PCIs were successfully performed. Baseline characteristics of treated bifurcations were similar between the two study arms. Minimum stent expansion at the distal main vessel (MV) segment was significantly lower with PSP as compared with PKP as assessed by both OCT and Micro-CT . Other significant findings included: higher stent eccentricity index at proximal MV with PSP, higher SB scaffolding length and lower malapposition (at bifurcation core and distal MV) with PKP.

These data need to be confirmed by further randomized studies in humans.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Policlinico A. Gemelli. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Clinical inclusion criteria:

  • Subject has coronary artery disease involving a bifurcation with evidence of myocardial ischemia, including patient with chronic coronary syndromes, unstable angina, or non-ST elevation-acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) hemodynamically stable.
  • Subject is suitable to be treated by PCI according to operator's judgement or heart team decision.
  • PCI planning includes provisional stenting and image guidance by OCT use.
  • Patient is aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Patient can provide written informed consent

Angiographic inclusion criteria:

- De novo coronary lesion involving the left main bifurcation, or a bifurcation lesion not located in the left main with large branches (distal MV reference diameter ≥ 3.5 mm and SB reference diameter ≥ 2.75 mm on visual estimation)

Clinical exclusion criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndromes with ST-elevation (STE-ACS)
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • LVEF ≤ 30%
  • Pregnancy
  • Known severe thrombocytopaenia (platelet count < 50,000/mm3)
  • eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/m2 (Cockcroft-Gault)
  • Contraindications to antiplatelet drugs/anticoagulant drugs
  • Significant allergic reactions for contrast agent
  • Women with pregnancy potential.

Angiographic exclusion criteria:

  • Target chronic total occlusion
  • Planned 2 stent-strategy
  • Target bifurcation lesion has a previously implanted stent
  • Target graft lesions
  • Medina 0.0.1 target lesions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: POT/KISSING/POT (PKP)
  • SB rewiring is performed with the objective to cross "distal" stent struts (distal rewiring) through pullback technique.
  • KBI is performed using short non-compliant balloons (balloon of MV sized in a 1:1 ratio with distal MV reference diameter and SB balloon sized in a 1:1 ratio with SB reference diameter), with sequential followed by simultaneous inflation.
  • Final POT is performed at the same way as initial POT
OCT will be used to assess results after intervention
Active Comparator: POT/SIDE/POT (PSP)
  • SB rewiring is performed with the objective to cross "distal" stent struts (distal rewiring) through pullback technique.
  • SB dilatation is performed with a balloon sized 1:1 according to SB reference diameter.
  • Final POT is performed at the same way as initial POT.
OCT will be used to assess results after intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stent expansion
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Minimum stent expansion
Intra-procedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side branch ostial scaffolding length
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
difference between maximal stent diameter at bifurcation core and distal reference diameter
Intra-procedural
Stent eccentricity index
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
SEI = minimum stent diameter/maximum stent diameter
Intra-procedural
Stent complications
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Stent under-expansion
Intra-procedural
Additional treatment after OCT
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
need of additional treatment after assessment of results by OCT
Intra-procedural
Stent malapposition
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Stent malapposition
Intra-procedural
Stent proximal edge dissection
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Stent proximal edge dissection
Intra-procedural
Tissue prolapse
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Tissue prolapse
Intra-procedural
Intracoronary thrombus
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Intracoronary thrombus
Intra-procedural
Side branch ostium dissection
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
Side branch ostium dissection
Intra-procedural
Stent complicatons
Time Frame: Intra-procedural
In-stent dissection
Intra-procedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Burzotta, MD, PhD, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on OCT

3
Subscribe