Motor Learning Approaches From Working on a Vertical Surface in Hemiplegic Children's Upper Limb Motor Skills

April 8, 2023 updated by: Omnya Samy Abdallah Ghoneim

Effectiveness of Intensive Motor Learning Approaches From Working on a Vertical Surface on Hemiplegic Children's Upper Limb Motor Skills

Working on a vertical surface is one of the best activities children can do to make themselves more successful in many areas as an infant which builds all those foundational skills required for the all-important task of handwriting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Motor-learning approaches such as - constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) offer an array of sensorimotor experiences in a playful yet repetitive and intense fashion.

A stable shoulder girdle is the co-contraction of muscles around the scapula and shoulder joint.

Depending on the activity, vertical surfaces will have kids moving their arms frequently; reaching up, down, out and around. This supports extension of the arm and an opportunity to strengthen those muscles.

Vertical surfaces facilitate wrist extension. When the wrist is extended, the ring and pinky finger tend to naturally find their way into the palm creating a more optimal grasp pattern. A child is going to be able to execute more precise and legible work when using a functional tripod or quadrupod grasp.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo
      • Badr, Cairo, Egypt
        • Badr University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children diagnosed with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy
  2. Age 5 to 9 years
  3. Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)19 scores I, II.
  4. Children who can understand and cooperate with researcher's instructions
  5. Children with no visual or hearing impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with any surgical interference in the upper limb.
  2. Intellectual disability such that simple tasks could not be understood or executed.
  3. Inability to combine the study protocol with the regular school program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control group
received intensive motor-learning approaches that focuses on training of the affected hand (motor-learning approaches such as - constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) provide an alternative).
  1. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT)
  2. Hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT)
Experimental: study group
received the intensive motor-learning approaches of the control group but from a vertical surface
  1. Ball on wall, kneel to stand
  2. Kneel walk cross over
  3. Vertical playground puzzles and games
  4. Color on big boxes
  5. Fridge magnets
  6. Erasing a whiteboard or chalkboard
  7. Tactile feedback from textured walls

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QUEST
Time Frame: 3 month
quality of upper extremity skills test (Only dissociated movement, grasp and weight bearing domains QUEST will be assessed).
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Omnya samy, PHD, lecturer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/003981

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

individual participant data is a private data for this research

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemiplegia

Clinical Trials on motor learning and occupational therapy

3
Subscribe