Comparison of Botulinum Toxin Injection Techniques in Spasticity

November 8, 2022 updated by: Savaş Karpuz, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital

Comparison of the Efficacy of 2 Different Botulinum Toxin Injection Techniques in Gastrocnemius Muscle Spasticity in Hemiplegic Patients: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study.

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the classical (2-4 points to the muscle proximal) application of botulinum toxin in the treatment of spasticity with the application along the length of the gastrecnemius muscle.

The main question it aims to answer Is botulinum toxin more effective in the treatment of spasticity than the classical application applied along the length of the gastrocnemius muscle? Participants will be evaluated for spasticity before and 1 month after injection.

Researchers will compare classical versus application along the length of the muscle to see if there is a reduction in spasticity.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Selçuklu
      • Konya, Selçuklu, Turkey, 42060
        • Konya Beyhekim Research and Training Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with spastic hemiplegia
  • Spasticity in the gastrocnemius muscle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have spasticity in other muscles that will affect ankle movements
  • Those who use myorelaxant or myospasm-effective drugs
  • Those who have been applied botulinum toxin in the last 3 months
  • Those who have contractures in the ankle and knee due to orthopedic reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Classic injection
200iu/2ml OnabotulinumtoxinA in total to 2-4 points proximal to the gastrocnemius muscle
200iu/2ml in both groups
Experimental: İnjection along the length of the muscle
A total of 200iu/2ml of onabotulinumtoxinA by spreading along the length of the gastrocnemius muscle
200iu/2ml in both groups

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spasticity assessment (change between pre-injection and 1-month control)
Time Frame: before injection and 1 month after injection
Modified ashworth scale
before injection and 1 month after injection
Spasticity assessment (change between pre-injection and 1-month control)
Time Frame: before injection and 1 month after injection
Tardieu scale
before injection and 1 month after injection
Spasticity assessment (change between pre-injection and 1-month control)
Time Frame: before injection and 1 month after injection
Joint range of motion measurement
before injection and 1 month after injection
ambulation level (change between pre-injection and 1-month control)
Time Frame: before injection and 1 month after injection
functional ambulation scale
before injection and 1 month after injection
ambulation velocity (change between pre-injection and 1-month control)
Time Frame: before injection and 1 month after injection
preferred walking speed
before injection and 1 month after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Savaş Karpuz, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Shared if requested.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spastic Hemiplegia

Clinical Trials on Onabotulinumtoxina for Injection

3
Subscribe