Guided Biaxial Alveolar Distraction Device in Posterior Atrophic Mandible

November 1, 2022 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Guided Biaxial Alveolar Distraction Device in Posterior Atrophic Mandible (A Clinical Trial)

Atrophic alveolar bone presents a unique difficulty, preventing correct implant placement and affecting long-term results. There are different techniques that are recommended to restore the proper length of the posterior ridge of the mandible and thus achieve proper form and function, one of those is distraction osteogenesis. Refinements in the technique of distraction can improve the treatment outcome and decrease postoperative complications.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Azarita
      • Alexandria, Azarita, Egypt, 00203
        • Recruiting
        • Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
        • Contact:
          • Faculty of Dentistry
          • Phone Number: (203) 4868308
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amany M Alrayess, Msc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the posterior atrophic mandible.
  • The distance from the alveolar crest to the upper border of the canal is not less than 5 mm.
  • Adult patients from 30-60 years old with no gender predilection who agreed to present for follow-up visits for a minimum postoperative period of 4 months.
  • Patientswithanadequateoralhygiene.
  • The patient should be psychologically accepting of the involved procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients contradicting operation (ASA III, IV & V).
  • Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy or bisphosphonate.
  • Bonediseases(Osteoporosis,Osteopetrosis,Osteomalacia...etc.)
  • Any habits that might retard healing such as heavy smoking and alcoholism.
  • A history of any grafting procedure at the designated area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Guided biaxial distraction
A crestal incision will be done, a surgical guide will be placed to assist the correct position of osteotomy, an Extraosseous alveolar distractor will be placed on the ridge to mark screw sites and then will be removed, A distractor will be stabilized to the basal segment with a monocortical screw.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain scorre
Time Frame: at 1, 7 and 14 days
It will be assessed on daily basis for one week through a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe)
at 1, 7 and 14 days
change in wound healing
Time Frame: at 1, 7 and 14 days
The sutured wounds will be examined for wound dehiscence as (Yes for present and No for absent)
at 1, 7 and 14 days
Change in mental nerve reflex
Time Frame: Baseline, after 2 weeks and 1 month
Mental nerve blink reflex responses to electrical stimuli given with a small bipolar pediatric stimulating electrode to the center of the mental nerve distribution on the chin and lower lip on each side will be recorded bilaterally with surface electrodes on the orbicularis oculi muscles with Viking IV EMG equipment
Baseline, after 2 weeks and 1 month
Change in bone density
Time Frame: Baseline,1 month, 3 months
Bone density at the distracted area, the length will be gained and displacement of transported segment lingually will be evaluated using CBCT
Baseline,1 month, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Distractors_2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandible; Deformity

Clinical Trials on Guided biaxial alveolar distraction device

Subscribe