Micro-Randomized Trial to Optimize Digital Oral Health Behavior Change Interventions (DCBI)

March 18, 2025 updated by: Vivek Shetty, DDS, DMD, University of California, Los Angeles

Personalized Digital Behavior Change Interventions to Promote Oral Health

The study will involve a 10-week Micro-Randomized Trial (MRT) to inform the delivery of prompts (via mobile app push notifications) designed to facilitate adherence to an ideal tooth brushing protocol (2x2x4; 2 sessions daily, 2 minutes per session, all 4 quadrants).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The goal of the MRT is to investigate whether delivering (vs. not delivering) a prompt that contains engagement strategies grounded in decision science is beneficial in terms of promoting proximal oral health behavior (OHB) score, which reflects adherence to the 2x2x4 brushing protocol (Primary Aim) and also mobile health engagement (mHealth; Secondary Aim). Additionally, Exploratory Aims will concern (a) comparing different types of prompts in terms of proximal OHB score and mHealth engagement, (b) investigating the conditions in which prompts should be delivered to most effectively promote proximal OHB and mHealth engagement; and (c) investigating whether the effect of the engagement prompts (vs. no prompt) on OHB score varies across components of the 2x2x4 brushing regimen (i.e., frequency, duration, or coverage).

Participants will receive an electronic toothbrush (eBrush) and a mobile app (Oralytics) that contains well-established behavior change strategies (e.g., goal setting, monitoring adherence, and feedback). Participants will be randomized twice per day - in the morning and the evening - to receive either (a) a push notification containing one of three (randomly selected) engagement strategies or (b) no notification.

During the 10 weeks of the study, a Bayesian algorithm will iteratively adjust the probability of receiving a prompt or no prompt in any given randomization window, using prior behavioral data collected through the eBrush and mobile app. Data patterns suggesting positive effects of the prompts on adherence to brushing protocol, especially duration, will result in higher subsequent probabilities of receiving the prompts, whereas patterns suggesting null or negative effects will result in lower probabilities of receiving the prompts.

Study results will inform the implementation of a smartphone-delivered behavior change intervention that further adapts the delivery of engagement prompts based on passively collected information from an eBrush and the mobile app.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1668
        • University of California, Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults, age 18 or older.
  • Fluent in English
  • Dentulous/partially edentulous (18+ teeth; at least 2 teeth in each quadrant)
  • Possess a smartphone (iOS or Android) with a data plan.
  • Willing to allow the passive collection of data on tooth-brushing activities in the home setting for 10 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in English
  • Edentulous
  • Unable to use a mobile device due to cognitive or physical impairments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Each participant-time point will be randomized between a prompt containing an engagement strategy vs. no prompt. A Bayesian algorithm will iteratively adjust the probability of receiving a prompt or no prompt at any time point, using brushing behavior data. Patterns suggesting positive effects of the prompts on brushing adherence will result in higher subsequent probabilities of receiving the prompts, whereas patterns suggesting null or negative effects will result in lower probabilities of receiving the prompts. A participant is assigned to an engagement prompt will be randomized equally between the three types of engagement strategies: (1) Standard reciprocity prompt: delivering non-contingent reward points as a "gift" to support goals; (2) Reciprocity by proxy prompt: delivering a message indicating a donation to the person's selected charity; (3) Curiosity prompt: delivering oral health information in a manner that motivates the participant to seek new knowledge and information.
The study's mobile app (Oralytics) will be used to deliver engagement prompts. The prompts contain messages that leverage three engagement strategies: reciprocity, reciprocity by proxy, and curiosity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proximal adherence to 2x2x4 OHB
Time Frame: 24 hours
Change in proximal OHB score between the current and next randomization
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proximal mHealth engagement
Time Frame: 24 hours
Engagement with Oralytics app (i.e., accessing the Oralytics app or clicking on the push notification) between the current and next randomization.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vivek Shetty, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB#21-001471
  • UG3DE028723 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A de-identified dataset will be generated and made available to the research community. The dataset will be stripped of all codes or any other information that could be linked back to the original data or an individual participant. Prospective users of this dataset must agree to a confidentiality agreement and get permission from the Primary Investigator to use or share the data with anyone else. All external requests for data will be directed to Dr. Vivek Shetty. Prospective investigators will submit a written proposal to the PI outlining the question they will investigate, the specific variables that they need to answer that question, their analytic plan for answering that question, and documentation of sufficient Institutional Review Board oversight (e.g., approval or exemption). Investigators will also need to sign a confidentiality agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

12 months after publication of primary analyses.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All external requests for data will be directed to the PI (Dr. Vivek Shetty). Prospective investigators will submit a written proposal to the PI outlining the question they will investigate, the specific variables that they need to answer that question, their analytic plan for answering that question, and documentation of sufficient Institutional Review Board oversight (e.g., approval or exemption). Investigators will also need to sign a confidentiality agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Diseases

Clinical Trials on Engagement Strategies

Subscribe