Holographic Screens as a Replacement of Monitors During GI Endoscopies

September 1, 2023 updated by: Carlos Robles-Medranda, Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas

Mixed-reality Holographic Screens as the Replacement of Monitors in the Endoscopy Suite: a Multicenter Study

Nowadays, the application and development of spatial technologies have shown an increased interest in different fields of medicine, especially in procedural specialties. Many studies have shown the utility of augmented and virtual reality; however, studies evaluating mixed reality are scarce.

In gastroenterology, some proposed advantages of MR are the 3D space guidance, its increased situational awareness, remote assistance, and the reduction of surgical monitors in the units. Based on this, the researchers proposed a multicenter trial to assess the added value of MR through a holographic device during gastroenterology endoscopic procedures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the medical field, many technologies have emerged to aid healthcare providers during training, communication, and management of patients. The area of spatial computing is becoming part of the immersive developing technology. The main components of spatial computing are augmented, virtual, and mixed reality (AR, VR, and MR, respectively).

VR is a human-computer interface that simulates a realistic environment, while AR superimpose elements of VR in a real-world environment. AR is an enhanced version of the real-world achieved through sensory information delivered via technology. Moreover, the combination of both is known as MR. Mixed reality is an interactive, real-time processed, three-dimension registered technology.

In medicine, published data has broadly demonstrated the utility and advantages of AR and VR in many fields like neurosurgery, cardiology, maxillofacial, hepatobiliary, and orthopedics. However, information about MR for health purposes is scarce.

Based on the above, it is necessary to develop studies to assess the utility of MR in other procedural medical fields like gastroenterology. Some of the proposed advantages of MR in gastroenterology, mainly during endoscopic procedures, are the 3D space guidance and gesture operation (translation and rotation) without touching the object, the increase in situational awareness by reduction of real-world and content refocusing, the remote assistance during procedures, and the replacement/reduction of the use of monitors during the procedures.

To evaluate the advantages and added value of MR in gastroenterology, the researchers proposed a multicenter trial in the endoscopic units by using a built developed application (HXtendTM, mdconsgroup, Guayaquil, Ecuador) for the HoloLens2TM (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) holographic device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guayas
      • Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador, 090505
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Martha Arevalo-Mora, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Juan Alcivar-Vasquez, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Maria Egas-Izquierdo, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Miguel Puga-Tejada, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jorge Baquerizo-Burgos, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Domenica Cunto, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Raquel Del Valle, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Juan C Mendez, Eng
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Efrain Sanchez, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fernando Jurado, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hannah Pitanga-Lukashok, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Expert gastrointestinal endoscopists performing diagnostic colonoscopy, cholangioscopy, ERCP or EUS evaluation/intervention
  • Written informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refuse to participate in the study or to sign corresponding informed consent
  • Internet connection less than 100 MBs per second.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Endoscopy procedure + mixed reality
This group is comprised by expert gastrointestinal endoscopists designated to perform diagnostic procedures. The procedure will be performed without physical surgical monitors, and through the guidance of Mixed Reality by using the HXtend™ application holographic monitors.

Included expert gastrointestinal endoscopists performing diagnostic procedures with mixed reality guidance. All the procedures will be performed by using the HoloLens2TM (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), an ergonomic self-contained holographic device.

HoloLens2TM (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) uses HXtend™ developed software (mdconsgroup, Guayaquil, Ecuador) installed and running on Windows holographic OS. The monitors signals are replicated into holograms by an app developed with the unity Software package (Version 2022.1.22, Unity Technologies, San Francisco, CA, USA).

After each procedure, the researchers will evaluate the device performance along with the acceptance and experience of the endoscopists using this technology.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image quality during visualization of anatomical structures
Time Frame: up to three hours
The quality of image during the endoscopic procedure (hologram and surgical field) will be assess through perceptual judgment of the user by using a Likert scale.
up to three hours
Video processors interoperability
Time Frame: up to three hours
Interoperability, as the ability of computerized products to readily connect and exchange information with one another, will be measured between multiple video processors (Boston Scientific, Micro-tech and Pentax Medical) and the HoloLens2. Its assessment will be made by measuring the latency (ms) and the frames per second (FPS).
up to three hours
User´s device experience during real-time endoscopic procedures
Time Frame: Up to four hours

After performing the endoscopic procedure with mixed reality, the expert endoscopist´s experience will be evaluated.

The investigators will use a Likert's scale to assess user´s experience (comfort, functionality, and learnability).

Up to four hours
Device-based measured latency during endoscopic procedures
Time Frame: Up to three hours
Latency, as a measurement of the time it takes to the data to travel from one node to the other, will be measured by the device´s developed software using a networking library. The software will display the network metrics of the transmission. The latency will be measured in milliseconds.
Up to three hours
Interconnectivity
Time Frame: Up to three hours
Interconnectivity, as the connection between to HoloLens through the HXtend™, and the use of gestures from one HoloLens displayed in the second HoloLens, will be assessed by measuring the latency in milliseconds.
Up to three hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE, Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IECED-11222022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Diseases

Subscribe