Impact of Peripheral Afferent Input on Central Neuropathic Pain

December 2, 2022 updated by: University of Aarhus
The overarching aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of peripheral afferent input to spontaneous and evoked central neuropathic pain after a spinal cord lesion or disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A key question that has been subject to longstanding debates in the field relates to the sites and mechanisms within the peripheral or central nervous system that potentially perpetuate chronic spontaneous and evoked central neuropathic pain. The investigators hypothesize that spontaneous central neuropathic pain depends on continuous, "physiological" somatosensory input from the painful body region in the periphery. Thus, spontaneous central neuropathic pain results from pathological gain control in central somatosensory networks with decreased activation thresholds for thermo- and mechanosensitive peripheral afferents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Definite central neuropathic pain according to current diagnostic algorithms involving at least both feet or both hands bilaterally and symmetrically with regard to the expected neuroanatomical distribution of the nerve block.
  • Patients with spinal cord injury. For patients with pain in both legs, the injury has to be incomplete. For patients with pain in both arms, the injury can be complete or incomplete. The pain in the area that will be investigated (region of interest) has to be in an area with at least some preservation of sensation
  • An intensity of spontaneous pain of ≥4 NRS [0-10] in the region of interest during the screening visit and at the day of the intervention.
  • Participant is able and willing to give informed consent.
  • For female subjects of childbearing potential: A negative pregnancy test and either use of highly effective contraception or sexual abstinence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conus/cauda involvement or evidence of peripheral neuropathic pain due to documented peripheral lesion.
  • Other known neurological and psychiatric conditions
  • History or symptoms of significant diseases that may confound the measurements or represent contra-indications for the intervention (e.g., neuropathy following cancer or metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, liver diseases, and kidney diseases.
  • Cardiovascular diseases that preclude the anaesthetic intervention (e.g., arrythmias).
  • Concomitant nociceptive pain within the innervation territory of the planned nerve block.
  • Unable to understand and speak Danish
  • Changes in pain medication within the last 4 weeks prior to the intervention.
  • Treatment with warfarin or other blood thinning medications, that contraindicates regional anesthesia if the treating physician cannot recommend that such treatments are paused for at least 7 days before the study day
  • Infection or skin disease in planned injection area
  • Allergy for local anesthetics
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Pain intensity below 4 in the region of interest at the baseline measurement before the nerve block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lidocaine
Nerve block
Lidocaine (10 mg/ml) will be injected according to established protocols using ultrasound guidance and an aseptic technique by an experienced anesthesiologist.
Placebo Comparator: Isotonic saline
Nerve block
Isotonic saline will be injected according to established protocols using ultrasound guidance and an aseptic technique by an experienced anesthesiologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indication of most pain relief
Time Frame: 40 minutes
Limb with most pain relief on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0-10, 0=no pain 10=worst pain imaginable] 40 minutes after nerve block
40 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0-10, 0=no pain 10=worst pain imaginable] of spontaneous pain
Time Frame: 90 minutes
Intensity on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0-10, 0=no pain 10=worst pain imaginable] of spontaneous pain in the pre-specified region covered by the block 40, 60 and 90 min after the nerve block compared to baseline
90 minutes
Pain relief 45 min after the nerve block
Time Frame: 45 minutes
Pain relief 45 min after the nerve block using a 6-point verbal scale ranging from worse pain to no, little, moderate, good and complete pain relief (-1 to 4)
45 minutes
Pain extent [% of body surface on standardized pain drawings] 50 minutes after the nerve block
Time Frame: 50 minutes
Pain extent will be mapped on standardized pain drawings 50 minutes after the nerve block compared to baseline
50 minutes
Pain descriptors 50 minutes after the nerve block
Time Frame: 50 minutes
Pain descriptors (burning, squeezing, pins and needles, tingling, stabbing, electrical shocks) are captured 50 minutes after the nerve block compared to baseline
50 minutes
Area [% of pain extent] of hypersensitivity to thermal and nociceptive stimuli
Time Frame: 95 minutes
Area of hypersensitivity [% of pain extent] to warm (40°C) and cold (20°C) thermo rollers (Somedic AB, Hörby, Sweden), pinprick (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament no 5.88 (bending force 75.9 g/745 mN)), and brush (SENSELab Brush-05; Somedic AB, Hörby, Sweden), if any, 55 and 95 min after nerve block compared to baseline
95 minutes
Intensity of hypersensitivity on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0-10, 0=no pain 10=worst pain imaginable] to thermal and nociceptive stimuli
Time Frame: 95 minutes
Intensity of hypersensitivity on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [0-10, 0=no pain 10=worst pain imaginable] to warm (40°C) and cold (20°C) thermo rollers (Somedic AB, Hörby, Sweden), pinprick (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament no 5.88 (bending force 75.9 g/745 mN)), and brush (SENSELab Brush-05; Somedic AB, Hörby, Sweden), if any, 55 and 95 min after nerve block compared to baseline
95 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma lidocaine concentrations
Time Frame: 40 minutes
Plasma lidocaine concentrations approx. 40 min after the block.
40 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Rosner, MD, Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Diseases

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine (10 mg/ml)

Subscribe